Overview
Title
An Act To prohibit data brokers from transferring personally identifiable sensitive data of United States individuals to foreign adversaries, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024 is all about keeping people's personal information safe by stopping companies from sharing it with countries that aren't friendly to the U.S. It says that some important information, like health and location details, shouldn't be given away, and if companies break the rules, they'll get in trouble.
Summary AI
The Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024 aims to stop data brokers from providing sensitive personal data of U.S. residents to foreign countries considered adversaries or entities controlled by them. The bill places enforcement responsibility on the Federal Trade Commission and outlines penalties for violations, treating them as unfair or deceptive acts. It defines key terms like "data broker," "foreign adversary," and "sensitive data," which includes information such as health records, financial data, and precise geolocation. The prohibition will take effect 60 days after the bill is enacted.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, known as the “Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024,” seeks to restrict data brokers from transferring personally identifiable sensitive data of United States individuals to foreign adversaries or entities controlled by them. The bill aims to protect United States citizens' personal information from being accessed by countries or organizations that could pose a threat to national security. The enforcement of these rules falls under the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
Significant Issues
The bill presents several important considerations and challenges. One notable issue is the broad definition of "sensitive data" within the bill. It encompasses a wide variety of information, ranging from Social Security numbers and health records to biometric and genetic data. Given the expansive nature of this definition, data brokers and businesses may encounter difficulties complying with the legislation. The breadth of data covered could also raise concerns about potential privacy invasions from entities seeking to comply with the law.
The term "controlled by a foreign adversary" also raises concerns due to its lack of precise guidance on how indirect control is determined. This could complicate the enforcement of the bill and potentially lead to disputes about whether certain businesses fall under this definition.
Another significant issue revolves around the definition of "data broker” and its exclusions. The legislation excludes certain entities, such as those providing services that do not directly involve personally identifiable data. This exclusion may lead to loopholes where entities might exploit these criteria to continue prohibited data transactions.
The enforcement of this law by the FTC might also prove inadequate for the complexities involved in international data transfers. There are concerns that existing penalties under the FTC's jurisdiction may not suffice to address the intricacies and challenges posed by international enforcement.
Moreover, the bill's reliance on an external designation of what constitutes a "foreign adversary country" via section 4872(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, could present accessibility and interpretation issues, particularly for smaller businesses trying to understand their obligations.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to safeguard the personal information of U.S. individuals from foreign entities, which could enhance national security and protect citizens' privacy. However, the sweeping range of the sensitive data definition could impose significant compliance burdens on businesses handling such data. These companies may face steep financial and logistical challenges as they adapt to meet regulatory requirements.
Impact on Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders, including data brokers and businesses handling sensitive data, could be significantly impacted if this bill becomes law. On one hand, it might compel these entities to adopt more stringent data security measures, potentially leading to increased costs and operational changes. On the other hand, the bill could benefit individuals whose data security may improve as a result of heightened regulations.
Moreover, smaller businesses might struggle to navigate the complexities of compliance, especially those less experienced with international data transactions. This could lead to increased operational costs or even legal challenges for these companies. Conversely, the act could positively impact stakeholders concerned with data privacy, strengthening public confidence in how personal data is managed and protected.
In summary, while the Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024 sets forth a robust effort to shield sensitive U.S. data from foreign threats, its implications for businesses and stakeholders are multifaceted, indicating a need for careful consideration and potential refinement to address the issues it raises.
Issues
The broad definition of 'sensitive data' in Section 2(c)(7) could include an overwhelming amount of information, making compliance particularly challenging for entities. This excessive breadth could have financial implications for businesses trying to meet regulatory requirements and provoke public concern about privacy invasions.
The term 'controlled by a foreign adversary' in Section 2(c)(2) lacks clear specifications regarding how indirect control is determined. This ambiguity could hinder effective enforcement and lead to legal challenges.
The definition of 'data broker' in Section 2(c)(3) allows exclusions for entities not directly involved in data transactions or offering certain services. This might lead to potential loopholes where entities claim exclusions while still engaging in prohibited data transfers to foreign adversaries, possibly leading to ethical issues and legal scrutiny.
The enforcement mechanisms relying on the Federal Trade Commission as per Section 2(b) may not be adequate for complex international data transfer issues. This could result in insufficient penalties for violations, raising political and legal concerns about the Act's effectiveness.
The dependence on section 4872(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, to define 'foreign adversary country' in Section 2(c)(4) requires cross-referencing that might be inaccessible or difficult to interpret for the public and smaller businesses, potentially leading to compliance challenges.
Exemptions for 'service providers' in Section 2(c)(3)(B)(v) may allow entities to reclassify themselves to evade regulation, challenging ethical standards and potentially creating financial incentives for misrepresentation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill states that the official name of the legislation is the “Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act of 2024.”
2. Prohibition on transfer of personally identifiable sensitive data of United States individuals to foreign adversaries Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section makes it illegal for data brokers to share or sell sensitive personal information of people in the U.S. to foreign enemies or entities controlled by them. It defines key terms, outlines the Federal Trade Commission's role in enforcing this rule, and specifies what constitutes sensitive data, like Social Security numbers and private communications.