Overview

Title

To amend chapters 95 and 96 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reform the system of public financing for Presidential election campaigns, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 7499 wants to change how money is used in big elections by giving more help to candidates but also making sure the money is tracked carefully, so everyone has a fair chance to win. However, some parts of the plan might make it easier for richer people to do better in the elections.

Summary AI

H.R. 7499 aims to reform the public financing system for Presidential election campaigns in the United States. The bill proposes changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including increasing certain matching payments, modifying eligibility requirements, and establishing a "Freedom From Influence Fund" to finance these efforts. It introduces new contribution limits and repeals some previous expenditure limitations, intending to make the election financing process more transparent and equitable. The legislation is set to take effect with the Presidential election in 2028.

Published

2024-02-29
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-02-29
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7499ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
24
Words:
8,827
Pages:
42
Sentences:
185

Language

Nouns: 2,377
Verbs: 596
Adjectives: 592
Adverbs: 33
Numbers: 402
Entities: 412

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.21
Average Sentence Length:
47.71
Token Entropy:
5.28
Readability (ARI):
25.76

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, known as the "Empower Act of 2024," aims to bring significant reforms to the system of public financing for Presidential election campaigns in the United States. Introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Lieu and Mrs. Foushee, this bill seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, impacting how funds are managed in both primary and general elections. Through various provisions, it proposes changes to matching payment processes, eligibility requirements, expenditure limits, and the source of funds, establishing the "Freedom From Influence Fund" as a central financial mechanism.

General Summary of the Bill

The Empower Act of 2024 introduces several changes to the public financing system for presidential campaigns. Key amendments include increasing matching payments to encourage wider public financing participation and setting new eligibility requirements for candidates. The bill repeals existing expenditure limitations, allowing candidates more freedom in fundraising and spending. Additionally, it outlines the formation of the "Freedom From Influence Fund," serving as the source for campaign payments and derived from assessments on fines and penalties.

Summary of Significant Issues

One major issue is the lack of clarity and transparency surrounding the "Freedom From Influence Fund." Although it plays a critical role as the source of payments, the bill does not provide sufficient detail on its funding, management, or auditing. This omission raises concerns about potential misuse or favoritism.

Another significant issue is the increase in matching payments to 600% of contributions up to $200. While this aims to boost public financing, there is no detailed justification or analysis of its financial impact. The repeal of expenditure limitations could skew the playing field, favoring wealthier candidates who can leverage personal or familial resources more effectively.

The assessment of 4.75% on fines and penalties to fund this initiative has been questioned for lacking justification. This high rate may appear punitive and could impact settlements or business operations.

Finally, the bill’s provisions, including timing for matching payments and prohibitions on joint fundraising, introduce complexities that could lead to administrative challenges or inequalities among candidates.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this bill could potentially reshape the landscape of presidential campaigns by encouraging greater reliance on public financing and reduced dependency on substantial private donations. This might have the positive effect of making campaigns more inclusive and less influenced by large donor interests.

However, without clear oversight and management structures, the "Freedom From Influence Fund" could inadvertently lead to misuse or uneven distribution of funds, potentially affecting the integrity of the campaign funding process.

Impact on Stakeholders

Candidates: Wealthier candidates may benefit from the removal of expenditure limitations, as they can utilize more substantial personal resources without constraints. On the other hand, candidates without significant financial backing may face challenges in leveling the field, despite the increased matching payment percentages.

Political Parties: Larger parties might gain an advantage due to the increased limit on coordinated party expenditures, allowing them to support their candidates more robustly. This could disadvantage smaller parties with limited resources, affecting the equity of competition during elections.

General Public: For voters, the bill could lead to more diverse candidate platforms and reduce the influence of major donors if public financing mechanisms are effectively implemented. However, concerns about fund management and potential misallocation could undermine confidence in the fairness of the financing system.

In conclusion, the Empower Act of 2024 sets out ambitious reforms for presidential campaign financing. While it holds the promise of making elections more transparent and less influenced by big-money donors, it faces significant challenges that need to be addressed to ensure equitable and effective implementation. Careful consideration of the issues outlined could enhance the bill’s capacity to foster a more level playing field in presidential campaigns.

Financial Assessment

The proposed legislation, H.R. 7499, seeks to reform the public financing system for presidential elections, and it introduces several significant financial changes. These adjustments are intended to enhance transparency and fairness in campaign funding, though they raise certain concerns.


Financial Allocations and Spending:

H.R. 7499 includes provisions for significantly increasing matching payments to presidential candidates. Specifically, the bill proposes that eligible candidates receive a match equal to 600% of certain contributions up to $200. While aimed at increasing public financing for campaigns, this could lead to substantial increases in public spending, a point that lacks detailed justification or financial analysis concerning its broader budgetary impact.

Moreover, section 204 mentions an increase in the limit on coordinated party expenditures to $100,000,000. This figure represents a substantial amount of money allocated for party support in campaigns, indicating a shift that might disproportionately benefit larger parties with more extensive resources.


Freedom From Influence Fund:

Central to the bill is the establishment of a "Freedom From Influence Fund". This fund is designed as a source for candidate payments in both primary and general elections. However, the fund's transparency and management raise concerns. The legislation does not provide comprehensive details on the mechanisms for funding, managing, or auditing this fund, leaving critical questions about its potential misuse and favoritism unanswered. This is particularly pressing given that the fund draws its finances from penalties and fines assessed at a rate of 4.75%, which some argue could be perceived as punitive.


Repeal of Expenditure Limitations:

The bill also repeals certain expenditure limitations that could shift the dynamics of campaign financing. By removing these caps, the legislation may inadvertently create an uneven playing field, favoring candidates with more personal wealth. Since candidates can utilize personal funds up to $50,000, this provision might undermine efforts toward equitable campaign financing.


Provisions and Definitions:

The use of key financial terms, such as "matchable contribution" and "qualified campaign contribution", highlights potential complexities within the bill. These terms determine the kinds of contributions eligible for matching payments and need clear definitions to avoid enforcement challenges. Without precise definitions and enforcement mechanisms, such ambiguities could lead to differing interpretations, which might affect the fairness and integrity of the financing system.


In summary, while H.R. 7499 aims to refine public election financing, its financial provisions present both opportunities for reform and potential challenges. The bill increases public spending in campaign finance, introduces a new fund with insufficient clarity on oversight, and modifies expenditure rules in ways that might advantage wealthier candidates or larger political parties. Addressing these concerns through clearer definitions and rigorous auditing processes would be crucial for ensuring the intended outcomes of equity and transparency in presidential campaign finances.

Issues

  • The lack of clarity on the "Freedom From Influence Fund" raises transparency and accountability concerns. The fund is used as a source for payments in both primary and general elections (Sections 107, 208, 301, 9013, 9043), yet there is insufficient detail on how it will be funded, managed, or audited to prevent misuse or favoritism.

  • The increase in matching payments to 600% of contributions up to $200 (Sections 101, 203) could lead to excessive public spending and disproportionately impact the budget without a detailed justification or analysis of its financial implications.

  • Repeal of expenditure limitations (Sections 103, 202) may create an uneven playing field favoring candidates with more personal or familial wealth, thus potentially undermining the fairness of presidential election campaigns.

  • The high assessment rate of 4.75% on fines and penalties to fund the "Freedom From Influence Fund" (Section 302, 9706, 6761) lacks justification and could be perceived as punitive or arbitrary, potentially affecting settlements or business operations.

  • The provisions relating to the availability and timing of matching payments and their respective audits (Sections 104, 105, 9013, 9043) introduce complexities and ambiguities, leading to potential administrative challenges and unequal treatment among candidates.

  • The increase in limit on coordinated party expenditures to $100,000,000 (Section 204) could advantage larger parties with more resources, potentially disadvantaging smaller parties and affecting the equity of electoral competition.

  • The ambiguity concerning the prohibition of joint fundraising committees (Section 102, 201) might lead to misunderstandings or loopholes, affecting the integrity of campaign funding rules.

  • The potential ambiguity and complexity in defining key terms such as "matchable contribution" and "direct contribution" (Sections 101, 203) may lead to enforcement challenges and misinterpretations, affecting the implementation of the bill.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Empower Act of 2024 aims to reform the election process by modifying how primary and general election funds are managed, including changes to matching payment processes, eligibility requirements, and expenditure limits. It establishes a “Freedom From Influence Fund” for financial contributions, sets a uniform date for payment release, and specifies effective dates for these changes.

101. Increase in and modifications to matching payments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines changes to the matching payment system in the Internal Revenue Code related to presidential election campaigns. It increases the matchable contribution percentage to 600%, sets a limit on personal contributions, defines what qualifies as a "direct contribution," and adjusts the maximum payment limit to $250 million, with provisions for future inflation adjustments.

Money References

  • — (1) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 9034(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (A) by striking “an amount equal to the amount of each contribution” and inserting “an amount equal to 600 percent of the amount of each matchable contribution (disregarding any amount of contributions from any person to the extent that the total of the amounts contributed by such person for the election exceeds $200)”; and (B) by striking “authorized committees” and all that follows through “$250” and inserting “authorized committees”. (2) MATCHABLE CONTRIBUTIONS.—Section 9034 of such Code is amended— (A) by striking the last sentence of subsection (a); and (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(c) Matchable contribution defined.—For purposes of this section and section 9033(b)— “(1) MATCHABLE CONTRIBUTION.—The term ‘matchable contribution’ means, with respect to the nomination for election to the office of President of the United States, a contribution by an individual to a candidate or an authorized committee of a candidate with respect to which the candidate has certified in writing that— “(A) the individual making such contribution has not made aggregate contributions (including such matchable contribution) to such candidate and the authorized committees of such candidate in excess of $1,000 for the election; “(B) such candidate and the authorized committees of such candidate will not accept contributions from such individual (including such matchable contribution) aggregating more than the amount described in subparagraph (A); and “(C) such contribution was a direct contribution. “(2) CONTRIBUTION.—For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘contribution’ means a gift of money made by a written instrument which identifies the individual making the contribution by full name and mailing address, but does not include a subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money, or anything of value or anything described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D) of section 9032(4). “(3) DIRECT CONTRIBUTION.
  • (b) Modification of payment limitation.—Section 9034(b) of such Code is amended— (1) by striking “The total” and inserting the following: “(1) IN GENERAL.—The total”; (2) by striking “shall not exceed” and all that follows and inserting “shall not exceed $250,000,000.”; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: “(2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.
  • “(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any applicable period beginning after 2029, the dollar amount in paragraph (1) shall be increased by an amount equal to— “(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by “(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year following the year which such applicable period begins, determined by substituting ‘calendar year 2028’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. “(B) APPLICABLE PERIOD.—For purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘applicable period’ means the 4-year period beginning with the first day following the date of the general election for the office of President and ending on the date of the next such general election.
  • “(C) ROUNDING.—If any amount as adjusted under subparagraph (1) is not a multiple of $10,000, such amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $10,000.”. ---

102. Eligibility requirements for matching payments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines changes to the requirements for candidates seeking matching payments for presidential campaigns. It raises the minimum contribution threshold to $25,000 from 20 states, sets a $1,000 per person contribution limit, requires candidates to participate in general election payment systems, and prohibits joint fundraising committees with political committees unless specific conditions are met.

Money References

  • (a) Amount of aggregate contributions per State; disregarding of amounts contributed in excess of $200.—Section 9033(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) by striking “$5,000” and inserting “$25,000”; and (2) by striking “20 States” and inserting the following: “20 States (disregarding any amount of contributions from any such resident to the extent that the total of the amounts contributed by such resident for the election exceeds $200)”. (b) Contribution limit.
  • — (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 9033(b) of such Code is amended to read as follows: “(4) the candidate and the authorized committees of the candidate will not accept aggregate contributions from any person with respect to the nomination for election to the office of President of the United States in excess of $1,000 for the election.”

103. Repeal of expenditure limitations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines changes to the Internal Revenue Code regarding campaign spending for presidential candidates. It repeals existing expenditure limits and requires candidates to follow a new rule that limits their personal and family spending on their campaign to $50,000.

Money References

  • (a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 9035 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: “(a) Personal expenditure limitation.—No candidate shall knowingly make expenditures from his personal funds, or the personal funds of his immediate family, in connection with his campaign for nomination for election to the office of President in excess of, in the aggregate, $50,000.”.

104. Period of availability of matching payments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section changes the timeframe for when candidates can start receiving matching funds for presidential elections. Instead of starting at the beginning of the election year, candidates can now receive funds starting six months before the earliest state primary election.

105. Examination and audits of matchable contributions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, an update is made to the Internal Revenue Code to include "matchable contributions" along with "qualified campaign expenses" when examining and auditing campaign finances.

106. Modification to limitation on contributions for Presidential primary candidates Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section changes the Federal Election Campaign Act by modifying the limit on contributions to Presidential primary candidates. Instead of setting the limit for each calendar year, the limit now applies to the entire four-year election cycle.

107. Use of Freedom From Influence Fund as source of payments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes that, starting with the 2028 Presidential election, all payments to candidates are to be made from the Freedom From Influence Fund. It also mandates audits to ensure sufficient funds are available and allows payments to be reduced if necessary, but prohibits using funds from other sources to make such payments.

9043. Use of Freedom From Influence Fund as source of payments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, starting in the 2028 Presidential election, all campaign payments to candidates must be made from the "Freedom From Influence Fund." If there isn't enough money in this Fund, payments to candidates will be reduced proportionally, and no other money can be used to make up the difference. However, if more funds become available during the election cycle, the reduced payments may be partially or fully restored.

201. Modification of eligibility requirements for public financing Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill modifies the rules for public financing eligibility in presidential elections, requiring candidates to have received primary campaign funds, agree to provide campaign expense records for auditing, and prohibits them from creating joint fundraising committees with other political committees unless those committees are exclusively for their authorized campaigns.

202. Repeal of expenditure limitations and use of qualified campaign contributions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill eliminates spending limits for presidential campaigns, allowing candidates to use qualified campaign contributions without restriction. It defines "qualified campaign contributions" and sets penalties for accepting unqualified donations, ensuring candidates from all parties face the same rules and penalties for violations.

Money References

  • (b) Definition of qualified campaign contribution.—Section 9002 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: “(13) QUALIFIED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION.—The term ‘qualified campaign contribution’ means, with respect to any election for the office of President of the United States, a contribution from an individual to a candidate or an authorized committee of a candidate which— “(A) does not exceed $1,000 for the election; and “(B) with respect to which the candidate has certified in writing that— “(i) the individual making such contribution has not made aggregate contributions (including such qualified contribution) to such candidate and the authorized committees of such candidate in excess of the amount described in subparagraph (A), and “(ii) such candidate and the authorized committees of such candidate will not accept contributions from such individual (including such qualified contribution) aggregating more than the amount described in subparagraph (A) with respect to such election.”
  • (B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of section 9007(b) of such Code, as redesignated by subparagraph (A), is amended— (i) by striking “a major party” and inserting “a party”; (ii) by striking “contributions (other than” and inserting “contributions (other than qualified contributions”; and (iii) by striking “(other than qualified campaign expenses with respect to which payment is required under paragraph (2))”. (3) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.— (A) REPEAL OF PENALTY FOR EXCESS EXPENSES.—Section 9012 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (a). (B) PENALTY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF DISALLOWED CONTRIBUTIONS; APPLICATION OF SAME PENALTY FOR CANDIDATES OF MAJOR, MINOR, AND NEW PARTIES.—Subsection (b) of section 9012 of such Code is amended to read as follows: “(b) Contributions.— “(1) ACCEPTANCE OF DISALLOWED CONTRIBUTIONS.—It shall be unlawful for an eligible candidate of a party in a Presidential election or any of his authorized committees knowingly and willfully to accept— “(A) any contribution other than a qualified campaign contribution to defray qualified campaign expenses, except to the extent necessary to make up any deficiency in payments received out of the fund on account of the application of section 9006(c); or “(B) any contribution to defray expenses which would be qualified campaign expenses but for subparagraph (C) of section 9002(11). “(2) PENALTY.—Any person who violates paragraph (1) shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
  • In the case of a violation by an authorized committee, any officer or member of such committee who knowingly and willfully consents to such violation shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”.

203. Matching payments and other modifications to payment amounts Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines amendments to the Internal Revenue Code regarding presidential campaign funding. It proposes equal payment allocations to major, minor, and new party candidates, caps total eligible funds at $250 million but allows for inflation adjustments after 2029, and further defines “matchable contributions” as individual donations not exceeding $1,000 per election.

Money References

  • (1) AMOUNT OF PAYMENTS; APPLICATION OF SAME AMOUNT FOR CANDIDATES OF MAJOR, MINOR, AND NEW PARTIES.—Subsection (a) of section 9004 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: “(a) In general.—Subject to the provisions of this chapter, the eligible candidates of a party in a Presidential election shall be entitled to equal payment under section 9006 in an amount equal to 600 percent of the amount of each matchable contribution received by such candidate or by the candidate’s authorized committees (disregarding any amount of contributions from any person to the extent that the total of the amounts contributed by such person for the election exceeds $200), except that total amount to which a candidate is entitled under this paragraph shall not exceed $250,000,000.”
  • — “(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any applicable period beginning after 2029, the $250,000,000 dollar amount in subsection (a) shall be increased by an amount equal to— “(A) such dollar amount; multiplied by “(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year following the year which such applicable period begins, determined by substituting ‘calendar year 2028’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. “
  • “(3) ROUNDING.—If any amount as adjusted under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $10,000, such amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $10,000.”
  • (b) Matchable contribution.—Section 9002 of such Code, as amended by section 202(b), is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: “(14) MATCHABLE CONTRIBUTION.—The term ‘matchable contribution’ means, with respect to the election to the office of President of the United States, a contribution by an individual to a candidate or an authorized committee of a candidate with respect to which the candidate has certified in writing that— “(A) the individual making such contribution has not made aggregate contributions (including such matchable contribution) to such candidate and the authorized committees of such candidate in excess of $1,000 for the election; “(B) such candidate and the authorized committees of such candidate will not accept contributions from such individual (including such matchable contribution) aggregating more than the amount described in subparagraph (A) with respect to such election; and “(C) such contribution was a direct contribution (as defined in section 9034(c)(3)).”. ---

204. Increase in limit on coordinated party expenditures Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill proposes increasing the limit on how much a national political party can spend in support of a presidential candidate during a general election to $100,000,000, and it outlines when and how this amount will be adjusted for inflation starting in 2028. It also specifies that any communication or expenditure by the party related to a presidential candidate's campaign will count towards this spending limit.

Money References

  • (a) In general.—Section 315(d)(2) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30116(d)(2)) is amended to read as follows: “(2)(A) The national committee of a political party may not make any expenditure in connection with the general election campaign of any candidate for President of the United States who is affiliated with such party which exceeds $100,000,000.
  • — (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 315(c)(1) of such Act (52 U.S.C. 30116(c)(1)) is amended— (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking “(d)” and inserting “(d)(2)”; and (B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: “(D) In any calendar year after 2028— “(i) the dollar amount in subsection (d)(2) shall be increased by the percent difference determined under subparagraph (A); “(ii) the amount so increased shall remain in effect for the calendar year; and “(iii) if the amount after adjustment under clause (i) is not a multiple of $100, such amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $100.”

205. Establishment of uniform date for release of payments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Internal Revenue Code to establish a uniform date for the release of payments to eligible political party candidates, specifying the later of either the last Friday before the first Monday in September or 24 hours after certifications for all major political parties are received. It also changes the time frame for certification from 10 days to 24 hours.

206. Amounts in Presidential Election Campaign Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the law is changed to include a rule for calculating the balance in the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. The Secretary has to use an estimate of money that will be added to the fund in an election year, but this estimate can't be more than the average of the last three years' deposits.

207. Use of general election payments for general election legal and accounting compliance Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amended section of the Internal Revenue Code clarifies that expenses related to legal and accounting compliance for the general election by a candidate or their committee are considered expenses aimed at helping that candidate get elected.

208. Use of Freedom From Influence Fund as source of payments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the law changes to ensure that, starting from the 2028 Presidential election, all campaign payments must come from the "Freedom From Influence Fund." If the fund doesn't have enough money, payments to candidates will be reduced proportionally, and no other money sources can be used. The law also allows for payment restoration if funds become available later.

9013. Use of Freedom From Influence Fund as source of payments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In the 2028 Presidential election and beyond, the "Freedom From Influence Fund" will be the source for election payments. If the fund doesn't have enough money, payments to candidates will be automatically reduced, but could be partially restored if more money becomes available later in the cycle.

301. Freedom From Influence Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Freedom From Influence Fund is a special fund established in the U.S. Treasury to support political candidates financially. The money in this fund comes from specific sections of U.S. law and is used to make payments to political candidates according to the rules in the Internal Revenue Code, starting from when the law is enacted.

302. Assessments against fines and penalties Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, special assessments are added to fines, penalties, and settlements for certain offenses to support the Freedom From Influence Fund. The assessments apply to organizations and corporate officers involved in criminal offenses, civil penalties, and specific tax-related penalties, with a percentage of these amounts being allocated to the fund, while certain exceptions apply.

Money References

  • “(2) EXEMPT TAXPAYER.—For purposes of ths subsection, a taxpayer is an exempt taxpayer for any taxable year if the taxable income of such taxpayer for such taxable year does not exceed the dollar amount at which begins the highest rate bracket in effect under section 1 with respect to such taxpayer for such taxable year.

3015. Special assessments for Freedom From Influence Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section imposes a special assessment of 4.75% on fines for organizations or corporate officers convicted of federal crimes, and on settlements for those alleged to have committed such crimes. This money is collected like fines and transferred from the Treasury's General Fund to the Freedom From Influence Fund.

9706. Special assessments for Freedom From Influence Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the federal government will add an extra 4.75% charge on top of any civil or administrative penalties, or settlements, imposed on businesses (excluding individuals who aren't officers or similar authorities) to support the Freedom From Influence Fund. However, this extra charge does not apply to penalties or settlements that fall under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

6761. Special assessments for Freedom From Influence Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Each person who has to pay certain penalties must also pay an extra 4.75% of that penalty amount, unless they are an individual with income under a certain threshold. The additional money collected is transferred to the Freedom From Influence Fund.

Money References

  • (2) EXEMPT TAXPAYER.—For purposes of ths subsection, a taxpayer is an exempt taxpayer for any taxable year if the taxable income of such taxpayer for such taxable year does not exceed the dollar amount at which begins the highest rate bracket in effect under section 1 with respect to such taxpayer for such taxable year.

401. Effective date Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the law and its changes will start applying to the Presidential election in 2028 and all future Presidential elections. By June 30, 2026, the Federal Election Commission must create any necessary rules to implement this law.