Overview
Title
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to create a demonstration project for competency-based education and clarify eligible competency-based education programs.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7495 is a plan to let schools try new ways of teaching that help kids learn important skills, instead of just spending time in class, to make learning better and less expensive. It lets schools have special rules to help these programs, but some people worry about how fair and clear these rules will be.
Summary AI
H.R. 7495 aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to promote competency-based education by establishing a demonstration project. The bill defines competency-based education as focusing on students mastering specific skills and knowledge necessary for their field, as opposed to time spent in the classroom. It encourages the collection and sharing of information on the impact of this educational approach and allows for certain waivers and flexibilities in federal regulations to support its implementation. The goal is to improve the efficiency and reduce the cost of higher education while aligning educational outcomes with workforce needs.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, titled the “Empowering Learners through Competency-Based Education Act,” aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965. Its primary focus is to facilitate the adoption of competency-based education—a form of learning where students progress by mastering skills rather than spending a set amount of time in class. The bill seeks to introduce demonstration projects that would allow certain institutions to offer such programs with flexibility in regulatory requirements.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill proposes several key actions. Firstly, it seeks to formally define what constitutes a competency and a competency-based education program. It requires educational institutions with considerable student enrollment in these programs to report specific data metrics, such as costs and outcomes. The bill also lays the groundwork for potential demonstration projects where educational institutions would implement these programs, receiving specific regulatory waivers to allow for innovation and alignment with workforce needs. Additionally, it emphasizes studying the impact of competency-based programs to inform future policy and practice.
Summary of Significant Issues
One major issue raised is the potential for regulatory waivers to be applied inconsistently. Without clear criteria, this flexibility could be prone to misuse. The bill's definition of key terms like "competency" and "credential" remains broad, potentially leading to inconsistent implementation across various programs. There is also concern over resourcing and potential financial burdens necessary for collecting and reporting extensive data. Smaller institutions might be disadvantaged if given less latitude or resource assistance compared to larger institutions, which might better handle these demands.
Broad Impact on the Public
The bill, if enacted, might broadly affect how educational success is measured in higher education. While the potential for innovative educational approaches could benefit students by aligning their learning with job market needs, it could also complicate the landscape of higher education funding and accreditation. The broad definitions and likelihood of variable applications might mean that students in different programs could have vastly different experiences and outcomes, potentially affecting their employability and educational costs.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For students, especially non-traditional learners or those in underserved areas, competency-based programs could offer more accessible and relevant educational opportunities. However, the risk of unequal recognition of competencies might impact the perception of their credentials in the job market.
Educational institutions might face a mixed impact. On the one hand, the opportunity to innovate without being bound by traditional regulatory constraints is an attractive prospect. On the other hand, fulfilling the data reporting requirements could prove burdensome, particularly for smaller or less-resourced institutions, thus potentially widening the gap between them and larger universities.
Accrediting agencies could find themselves in a challenging position of enforcing standards without clear guidance from the bill, potentially affecting the consistency and credibility of competency-based programs.
Conclusion
While the bill aims to modernize and possibly improve the educational outcomes and cost-effectiveness of higher education, its success will heavily rely on how its provisions are implemented. Clarity and consistency in defining competencies and regulating program standards will be crucial. Moreover, ensuring that all institutions, regardless of size and resources, can participate equally is essential to its potential success.
Issues
**Sections 6 and 486B - Waivers and Flexibility:** The bill allows for waivers or flexibility from statutory or regulatory requirements without clearly defining the criteria or limitations for granting such waivers. This lack of specificity could lead to inconsistent application and potential abuse of waivers, raising concerns about fairness and transparency.
**Section 3 - Definition of 'Competency':** The definition of 'competency' is broad, potentially leading to varied interpretations and inconsistent implementation across different programs. This could result in variability in program quality and outcomes, affecting students' educational experiences and future employability.
**Section 5 - Competency-based Education Programs as Eligible Programs:** The inclusion of competency-based education programs as eligible programs lacks clarification on how these programs meet traditional academic year structures and how compliance is verified. This ambiguity could result in disputes over program eligibility and financial aid disbursement.
**Section 4 - Reporting Requirements:** The requirement for extensive data collection and verification for institutions with over 200 students could be resource-intensive and potentially lead to wasteful spending, especially without clear guidelines on managing these costs.
**Section 6 and 486B - Potential Favoritism:** The language in subsections regarding waivers and flexibility might inadvertently create favoritism towards certain types of programs or larger institutions capable of managing resource demands, potentially disadvantaging smaller entities.
**Sections 6 and 486B - Oversight and Accountability:** The oversight provisions lack detailed compliance measures, which could result in gaps in ensuring the accountability and effectiveness of the demonstration projects. This is a significant concern given the potential for waivers and flexibility in regulatory requirements.
**Section 3 - Undefined 'Credential':** The term 'credential' is not explicitly defined, which might cause confusion about what types of credentials are considered valid or acceptable, potentially affecting students' recognition in the workforce.
**Section 2 - Vague Language:** The section employs broad and vague language to describe objectives and expected improvements in learning outcomes and cost reduction, which might lead to differing interpretations and hinder the bill's effective implementation.
**Section 2 - Lack of Specificity:** The section refers to the 'collection and dissemination of complete and reliable information' but does not specify how this information will be collected, who will oversee it, and how it will be shared, complicating transparency and public scrutiny.
**Section 6 - Financial Aid Adjustments:** The provisions related to student financial aid adjustments present a risk of making students eligible for varying levels of federal assistance, leading to potentially complex financial planning issues for students participating in competency-based programs.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states its official name, which is the “Empowering Learners through Competency-Based Education Act.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress recognizes that competency-based education, which measures learning by what students know rather than time spent in class, is effective and cost-efficient. Due to its benefits, there's a push to adopt and expand this educational approach, gather data on its impact, and support its development in higher education to improve learning outcomes and reduce costs.
3. General definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Higher Education Act to define "competency" as the necessary knowledge and skills for a field and describes a "competency-based education program" as a college program that evaluates students based on what they learn, not just time spent in class, and awards credentials when students show mastery of these skills.
4. Reporting on competency-based education programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a requirement for the Secretary of Education to gather and share data on competency-based education programs from institutions with over 200 students in these programs. The collected data includes tuition, median earnings, time to credential, completion rates, and employment statistics, which will be used to identify best practices and report findings to Congress annually.
5. Definitions of academic year and eligible program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section updates the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include rules for competency-based education programs, stating that an "academic year" must meet certain credit and clock hour requirements, and recognizing these programs as "eligible programs" under the Act.
6. Competency-based education demonstration projects Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a program where the U.S. Secretary of Education can select institutions to run competency-based education projects for five years, granting them certain regulatory waivers to innovate. These projects aim to align education with workforce needs, assess student progress through competencies rather than traditional credit hours, and expand educational opportunities, especially for underserved populations.
486B. Competency-based education demonstration projects Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Education is tasked with selecting educational institutions to run 5-year projects focused on competency-based education, where students progress by demonstrating mastery of skills rather than by time spent in class. These projects will receive flexibility in certain regulations, and the Secretary will evaluate them annually to assess their effectiveness and impact on student outcomes, with a final report provided after the projects' conclusion.
7. Rules of construction Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Programs that were considered eligible when the Empowering Learners through Competency-Based Education Act was enacted can continue being eligible as long as they meet the requirements in the Higher Education Act of 1965, even if they were also previously recognized under direct-assessment rules.