Overview

Title

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit exchanges from effecting transactions in securities issued by natural asset companies, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The Protect America’s Lands Act is a rule that says places where people trade stocks can't trade stocks from businesses that take care of nature, like forests or rivers, by keeping them healthy and safe. It's like a rule saying if you run a lemonade stand to help a garden, you can't sell lemonade tickets in places where everyone trades other tickets.

Summary AI

H. R. 7494, known as the “Protect America’s Lands Act,” seeks to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The bill proposes to make it illegal for national securities exchanges to facilitate transactions in securities issued by natural asset companies. A natural asset company is defined as one that manages land for the preservation and sustainable use of its ecological assets and services. The bill aims to prevent trading in securities from companies that control or are involved in such ecological conservation efforts.

Published

2024-02-29
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-02-29
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7494ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
560
Pages:
3
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 183
Verbs: 44
Adjectives: 25
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 13
Entities: 48

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.98
Average Sentence Length:
37.33
Token Entropy:
4.68
Readability (ARI):
19.17

AnalysisAI

The bill titled "Protect America’s Lands Act," introduced as H. R. 7494 in the House of Representatives during the 118th Congress, aims to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The amendment seeks to prohibit national securities exchanges from conducting transactions involving securities issued by what are termed "natural asset companies." Representative Green of Tennessee, along with multiple co-sponsors, introduced this legislation, which has been referred to the Committee on Financial Services for further consideration.

General Summary of the Bill

This proposed legislation seeks to introduce a new rule that would make it unlawful for exchanges to engage in securities transactions involving natural asset companies. A natural asset company, as defined in this bill, is essentially any company that manages land with an eye toward enhancing ecological performance and ecosystem services, such as conservation or sustainable management. The definition also encompasses companies that do not harm natural assets and aim to maintain or replenish these resources.

Summary of Significant Issues

One central issue with the bill is the vague definition of "natural asset companies," which could lead to confusion and misinterpretation in the financial industry. The term is not widely recognized or used, resulting in potential uncertainties about which companies fall under this new rule. Additionally, the bill does not specify how this prohibition will be enforced or which regulatory body will oversee compliance, leaving significant gaps in regulatory clarity. There is also no guidance on handling existing transactions once this amendment takes effect, nor does the bill address the economic impacts on companies currently trading in these securities.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill's intention to prohibit transactions involving natural asset companies could have varied effects on the public. On one hand, it might serve environmental goals by discouraging exploitative practices that harm ecological assets. On the other hand, if misapplied, it could inadvertently disincentivize investments in conservation and sustainable management projects, which might otherwise benefit communities and the environment.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders, such as companies operating within the realms of conservation and sustainable management, the bill could present significant challenges. Without clear definitions and guidance, these companies might find their operations constrained, facing difficulties in securing investments or conducting regular business activities on securities exchanges. Investors and financial institutions may also face uncertainty, hesitating to engage with companies labeled as natural asset companies due to the ambiguity surrounding compliance and enforcement.

Conversely, environmental advocates might view the bill as a protective measure for natural assets, potentially encouraging more stringent management practices. However, the overall positive or negative impact will heavily depend on how clearly and effectively the bill's provisions are implemented and interpreted by regulators and the financial industry.

In conclusion, while the "Protect America’s Lands Act" seeks to foster environmental protection through financial regulation, its successful implementation will require careful consideration of its definitions, compliance mechanisms, and economic implications for involved stakeholders.

Issues

  • The term 'natural asset company' in Section 2 is not commonly defined or understood within the financial industry, which may lead to confusion or misinterpretation when applying the prohibition in securities transactions.

  • Section 2's broad definition of 'natural asset companies' allows a variety of activities to fall under this definition, potentially causing regulatory challenges and creating uncertainty about which companies will be impacted.

  • The amendment in Section 2 lacks clarity on which regulatory body will be responsible for overseeing compliance with this prohibition and the mechanisms by which enforcement will be handled, potentially leaving a gap in regulatory oversight.

  • There is no guidance in Section 2 on how any existing transactions involving natural asset companies will be handled once this amendment comes into effect, which could create legal and financial complications for affected companies.

  • The amendment does not address the potential economic impact or implications for natural asset companies currently involved in securities trading, which could result in significant political and financial repercussions.

  • The prohibition in Section 2 could lead to unintended consequences, such as discouraging investment in ecological and sustainable management projects that align with environmental and conservation goals.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill indicates its official name, which is the "Protect America’s Lands Act."

2. Prohibition with respect to effecting transactions in securities issued by natural asset companies Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section adds a new rule to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, making it illegal for national securities exchanges to conduct transactions involving securities from natural asset companies, which are companies focused on managing land for conservation and sustaining natural resources. A natural asset company is defined as one that either manages land to enhance natural resources and ecosystem services or ensures no harm to these resources, including affiliates of such companies.