Overview
Title
To ensure continued appropriations for certain Small Business Administration programs during a Government shutdown in fiscal year 2024, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7473 is a plan to make sure small businesses can still get the help they need from the government, like loans and support, even if the government temporarily runs out of money. It suggests setting aside specific amounts of money to keep things running smoothly for small businesses during these times.
Summary AI
H.R. 7473, titled the "Funding Small Businesses During Shutdown Act," aims to ensure certain Small Business Administration (SBA) programs continue to receive funding during a government shutdown in fiscal year 2024. The bill proposes specific amounts of money be appropriated from the Treasury to cover salaries and expenses linked to loans under various sections of the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act. This funding ensures that loans for small businesses can still be serviced, even if general appropriations are interrupted.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislative measure, designated as H.R. 7473, aims to secure ongoing funding for specific programs within the Small Business Administration (SBA) during any government shutdown that might occur in the fiscal year 2024. Introduced to the House of Representatives on February 28, 2024, this bill seeks to provide financial resources to maintain the operation of loan programs critical to small businesses, even when regular government spending is halted. The act is formally know as the "Funding Small Businesses During Shutdown Act" and outlines appropriations necessary to support loans and administrative costs of the SBA.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several noteworthy concerns primarily centered around financial specificity and oversight:
Limits and Justifications: The bill allocates specific sums for various loan programs, but it does not clarify whether these amounts are intended as maximum limits or fixed sums. Additionally, there is no explanation provided for why these particular amounts have been chosen, leaving the rationale behind this financial distribution unclear.
Vagueness and Guideline Absence: Terms like "necessary to continue servicing any loans" might be interpreted broadly, potentially leading to disagreements about what expenditures are actually essential. Furthermore, the lack of guidelines on prioritizing the expenses for salaries and administrative requirements leaves room for subjective decision-making without strict oversight.
Pro-ration and Oversight: While the bill accounts for shorter government shutdowns by stipulating pro-rated funding for periods less than 30 days, it does not articulate how this pro-ration should be calculated, which could create inconsistencies. Equally concerning is the absence of oversight or reporting mandates, raising the possibility of funds being misapplied or wasted.
Public Impact
The bill is crafted with the intention of buffering small businesses from the financial turbulence that often accompanies a government shutdown. By guaranteeing the continuation of funding for significant SBA loan programs, it may provide assurance and stability to small business owners who rely on these programs for their financial lifeline. Yet, without clear appropriation limits, guidelines for expenditure, or oversight mechanisms, there is a risk that taxpayer money could be mismanaged.
Stakeholder Implications
For small businesses, particularly those already engaged with SBA loan programs, the bill could offer a lifeline during a fiscal crisis. By ensuring that loans and administrative operations continue uninterrupted, these businesses may experience less anxiety and disruption.
On the other hand, stakeholders concerned with government spending and fiscal responsibility might view the bill with skepticism due to its lack of defined spending controls and oversight protocols. Lawmakers, auditors, and taxpayer advocacy groups could argue this might lead to inefficiencies or misuse of public funds.
Overall, while the bill carries noble intentions of aiding small businesses during financial contingency periods, the lack of clarity in its financial strategies and absence of oversight might fuel debate on its execution and efficacy. Such discourse is crucial in refining the bill to better serve its purpose without opening doors to potential pitfalls.
Financial Assessment
The bill, H.R. 7473, proposes specific financial allocations to ensure the continuation of Small Business Administration (SBA) programs during a government shutdown in fiscal year 2024. These appropriations aim to cover salaries and expenses necessary for servicing loans, even if regular government funding is temporarily halted.
Financial Allocations
The bill specifies the following appropriations:
- $500,000 for loans made under subsection (m) of section 7 of the Small Business Act.
- $2,916,666,667 for loans made under subsection (a) of section 7 of the Small Business Act.
- $1,250,000,000 for loans made under title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.
- $13,775,000 for administrative expenses related to the subsection (m) loan program.
These figures are designated to ensure that SBA loans can continue to be processed and serviced even during periods of funding interruptions.
Relation to Identified Issues
One key issue is the lack of clarity regarding whether these financial amounts are maximum limits or fixed allocations. This ambiguity could lead to potential overspending or inefficient use of funds. The absence of justification for the specific sums appropriated further exacerbates this concern, as stakeholders might question why these particular amounts have been chosen and if they represent the most efficient use of taxpayer dollars.
The language used in the bill, such as "necessary to continue servicing any loans," is noted as vague. Such terminology can be subject to broad interpretation, which may vary among different decision-makers. Without clear guidelines, it might be challenging to ensure these funds are utilized effectively and efficiently.
Moreover, the absence of criteria or guidelines on how these funds should be prioritized could lead to discretionary spending with minimal oversight. This lack of direction might result in inconsistent application of funds, making it difficult to track and manage the appropriations effectively.
Another area of concern is the provision for prorating funds if the government shutdown is shorter than 30 days. Without specific guidance, there's potential for miscalculation or misuse of the allocated amounts, as well as potential discrepancies in how these funds should be adjusted.
Finally, the bill does not include any oversight or reporting requirements. This absence raises concerns about transparency and accountability, potentially leading to misuse or inefficient expenditure of the appropriated funds. It would be beneficial to have mechanisms in place to monitor and report on how these funds are being spent to ensure they serve their intended purpose of supporting small businesses during a government shutdown.
Issues
Section 2: The specific appropriated amounts do not indicate whether they are maximum limits or exact allocations, which could lead to confusion or over-spending.
Section 2: There is no justification for the specific amounts appropriated, raising concerns about potential wasteful use of resources.
Section 2: The term 'necessary to continue servicing any loans' is vague and could lead to differing interpretations of essential expenditures.
Section 2: The bill lacks criteria or guidelines on how funds for 'salaries and expenses necessary' should be prioritized, potentially allowing excessive discretion without oversight.
Section 2: The provision for pro-rating funds if the lapse is less than 30 days requires clearer guidelines for consistent application, possibly leading to miscalculations.
Section 2: The absence of oversight or reporting requirements raises concerns about the potential misuse of the appropriated funds.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act states that it can be referred to as the "Funding Small Businesses During Shutdown Act."
2. Continuation of certain Small Business Administration programs during a Government shutdown Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
During a government shutdown, the bill provides funding for 2024 to ensure that the Small Business Administration can continue paying salaries and expenses necessary for servicing loans. This includes specific amounts for loans under different sections of the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act, as well as funds for administrative costs.
Money References
- There are appropriated for fiscal year 2024, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, during any period of a lapse in discretionary appropriations with respect to the Small Business Administration during such fiscal year beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this section, for any 30-day period of such lapse (and on a pro-rated basis if such lapse is less than 30 days) to pay for the salaries and expenses necessary to continue servicing any loans made under— (1) $500,000 for loans made under subsection (m) of section 7 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)); (2) $2,916,666,667 for loans made under subsection (a) of section 7 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)); (3) $1,250,000,000 for loans made under title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695 et seq.); and (4) $13,775,000 for administrative expenses to carry out the loan program under subsection (m) of section 7 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)). ---