Overview

Title

An Act Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2024, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 7463 is a bill that makes sure the government has money to keep working until March 22, 2024, and changes some rules about how students get money for school, but doesn't affect other financial plans already made. It also says that when they calculate how much money the government is spending, this bill doesn't get counted, kind of like when you skip a turn in a game.

Summary AI

H.R. 7463 is a bill that extends the continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2024. It includes adjustments to the dates in a previously enacted appropriations act to keep the funding going until March 22, 2024. Additionally, the bill modifies aspects of the FAFSA process, impacting how student income is calculated and how much funding is allocated for certain fiscal years, without affecting previous appropriations. Lastly, it specifies that the financial effects of this bill will not be accounted for in certain budgetary scorecards, meaning it doesn't influence current pay-as-you-go requirements.

Published

2024-02-29
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Received in Senate
Date: 2024-02-29
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7463rds

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
7
Words:
996
Pages:
6
Sentences:
25

Language

Nouns: 277
Verbs: 65
Adjectives: 37
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 89
Entities: 91

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.11
Average Sentence Length:
39.84
Token Entropy:
4.87
Readability (ARI):
21.07

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Extension of Continuing Appropriations and Other Matters Act, 2024," serves multiple purposes. Primarily, it extends the Continuing Appropriations Act for the fiscal year 2024, which essentially means it provides temporary funding for government operations until more permanent budgetary measures can be implemented. Specifically, it modifies certain end dates governing appropriations, moving them to March 8 and March 22, 2024 respectively. Additionally, the bill touches on other legislative matters, notably including modifications to the Federal Application for Student Aid (FAFSA) rules, and provides significant appropriations for educational programs from 2024 through 2027. Furthermore, it exempts its budgetary impacts from being recorded in typical governmental fiscal accountability frameworks known as PAYGO scorecards.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill raises a few notable issues. Firstly, the exemption of its budgetary impacts from PAYGO scorecards might undermine fiscal discipline and transparency. PAYGO is typically used to ensure the government does not dip further into debt without corresponding budgetary offsets, so its exemption could lead to unchecked government spending.

Additionally, substantial sums have been appropriated within the FAFSA modifications, with a lack of clear guidance on how these funds will specifically be utilized or allocated. This raises potential concerns about financial efficiency and oversight. Furthermore, references within the bill and the context surrounding certain date amendments are left ambiguous, which could lead to misinterpretations of legislative intentions and implications.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, especially individuals receiving or applying for federal aid in education, the bill's modification to FAFSA could be beneficial. The adjustment in student income calculations and increased appropriation for education suggest an intention to make college more financially accessible. However, the public might also be wary of the bill's fiscal implications given that certain budgetary rules are bypassed, which might lead to increased federal debt or potential tax implications in the future.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For students and educational institutions, the changes to FAFSA and the increased educational appropriations represent potential positive impacts. Students may receive more financial aid or more equitable aid distribution under the new calculation rules. Educational institutions could also benefit indirectly from increased appropriations that might enhance educational programs or student support services.

On the other hand, fiscal conservatives and those advocating for stringent budget discipline may view the exemptions from PAYGO scorecards critically. These exemptions could be seen as bypassing necessary financial scrutiny and risk management processes.

In summary, while the bill seeks to address immediate funding needs and streamline educational financial aid, it poses questions about the discipline and accountability of its fiscal policies. The lack of detailed provisions regarding fund allocation and ambiguity in certain legislative references may warrant concern and require careful oversight to ensure the bill serves its intended public and stakeholder interests effectively.

Financial Assessment

The bill H.R. 7463 includes several significant financial references that impact federal budgeting and appropriations for fiscal year 2024 and beyond. This commentary explores these financial elements and their implications in light of identified issues.

Financial Appropriations in the Bill

One of the primary financial components of this bill is the modification to the FAFSA process. Under Section 101(b), the bill appropriates substantial sums of money to carry out the updated FAFSA guidelines. Specifically, the bill allocates $1,170,000,000 for fiscal year 2024, $3,170,000,000 for fiscal year 2025, $2,170,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, and $1,236,000,000 for fiscal year 2027 and each succeeding fiscal year.

These financial allocations are intended to support the changes made to the FAFSA calculation process, which affects how a student's available income is computed for educational grants and loans. The modification in the bill states that the student's available income shall not fall below -$1,500 for the award year 2024–2025 and not be less than zero for subsequent award years. This change is designed to potentially increase the financial aid eligibility for students who might have otherwise been disqualified or received less funding.

Concerns Over Financial Transparency and Accountability

The substantial appropriation amounts outlined for FAFSA adjustments raise concerns noted in the issues section regarding financial transparency. While large sums of money are dedicated for future fiscal years, the bill lacks detailed allocation specifics, which might lead to potential inefficiency or misuse. Without clear guidelines on how these appropriations should be spent or who will benefit, stakeholders might question the efficacy and transparency of these financial allocations.

Additionally, Section 102 discusses budgetary effects and explicitly states that these effects will not be entered into statutory or Senate PAYGO scorecards. PAYGO, or "pay-as-you-go," is meant to ensure that any new spending does not increase the federal deficit. The exemption from these scorecards could allow budgetary decisions to bypass certain accountability measures. Without such fiscal discipline, there's a potential for unchecked increases in government spending, which could result in a lack of transparency and accountability, as highlighted in the issues.

Implications of FAFSA Appropriations

The changes made to prior appropriations under Section 101(c) are also significant, though they lack a clear explanation of their impact on financial planning. Without understanding how these amendments affect existing educational programs or future commitments, it is challenging to assess their broader implications. This uncertainty can complicate budgeting and allocation decisions for institutions relying on FAFSA allocations and related financial aid programs.

Conclusion

The financial references in H.R. 7463 underscore major appropriations and adjustments to educational funding mechanisms, specifically through the FAFSA. While these efforts aim to improve educational access and simplify financial assistance calculations, concerns about transparency and accountability remain unaddressed. The exemption from budgetary scorecards and the absence of detailed funding allocation specifics may lead to inefficiencies and raise questions about responsible fiscal management. Understanding these nuances is essential for stakeholders evaluating the effectiveness and impact of this legislation.

Issues

  • The exemption from PAYGO scorecards in Section 102 might raise concerns regarding fiscal discipline and accountability. This section states that budgetary effects will not be entered on either statutory or Senate PAYGO scorecards. Such exemptions can be controversial as they can potentially lead to a lack of transparency and accountability in government spending.

  • Section 101's amendment to FAFSA includes substantial appropriations without detailed allocation specifics, which may lead to potential inefficiency or misuse of funds. Subsection (b) of the section appropriates substantial sums of money for multiple fiscal years without clearly outlining how these funds will be spent or who the recipients will be, raising concerns about financial transparency.

  • The ambiguity regarding references in the bill, particularly in Section 3, can lead to confusion about what specific sections or divisions apply to which parts of the legislation. Without clear contextual explanations, these references can be misinterpreted or not fully understood by both lawmakers and the public, impacting the transparency of the bill.

  • The amendment to date specifications in Section 101 regarding the Continuing Appropriations Act lacks essential context, limiting the ability to assess the broader implications of these changes. With no explanation of why these specific date changes were necessary or their potential effects, stakeholders are left without vital information needed for understanding the implications on budget and policy priorities.

  • The complex language found in Section 101 regarding the FAFSA modifications and in Section 102 concerning budgetary classifications can reduce transparency and accessibility for stakeholders who are not well-versed in legal terminology. The difficulty in understanding legislative language might reduce public engagement and scrutiny.

  • Section 101(c)'s changes to previous appropriations do not include a clear explanation of their impact on financial planning, making it challenging to determine how these amendments will affect existing programs or future financial commitments. This lack of explanation could potentially disrupt planning and budgetary allocations.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section gives the official name of the law, which is called the “Extension of Continuing Appropriations and Other Matters Act, 2024”.

2. Table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The second section of the act lists its table of contents, outlining the main parts including a short title, references, and two divisions: one focusing on the extension of the Continuing Appropriations Act for 2024, and another covering various other matters.

3. References Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Any reference to "this Act" within a specific section of the Act refers only to that particular section, unless stated otherwise.

101. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2024 has been updated to change the dates in certain sections: Section 106(3) now includes the date "March 22, 2024," and Section 106(4) includes "March 8, 2024."

Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section designates the name of a legislative act that extends temporary funding and is referred to as the “Extension of Continuing Appropriations Act, 2024”.

101. Modification to FAFSA Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill modifies the rules for calculating a student's financial aid eligibility by adjusting their available income and sets minimum amounts for future academic years. It also authorizes additional funding for education programs from fiscal years 2024 to 2027 and states that these changes will be treated as part of the already enacted FAFSA Simplification Act.

Money References

  • (a) In general.—Section 475(g)(1) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087oo(g)(1)), as amended by the FAFSA Simplification Act (title VII of division FF of Public Law 116–260), is further amended to read as follows: “(1) IN GENERAL.—The student’s available income is equal to— “(A) the difference between the student’s total income (determined in accordance with section 480) and the adjustment to student income (determined in accordance with paragraph (2)); multiplied by “(B) 50 percent, except that the amount determined under this paragraph shall not be less than -$1,500 for award year 2024–2025 and not less than zero for award year 2025–2026 and each award year thereafter.”
  • (b) Appropriation.—Section 401(b)(7)(A) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(b)(7)(A))), as amended by the FAFSA Simplification Act (title VII of division FF of Public Law 116–260), is further amended to read as follows: “(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to any funds appropriated under paragraph (6) and any funds made available for this section under any appropriations Act, there are authorized to be appropriated, and there are appropriated (out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated) to carry out this section— “(i) $1,170,000,000 for fiscal year 2024; “(ii) $3,170,000,000 for fiscal year 2025; “(iii) $2,170,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; and “(iv) $1,236,000,000 for fiscal year 2027 and each succeeding fiscal year.”.

102. Budgetary Effects Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section specifies that the financial impacts of this division will not be recorded on any PAYGO (Pay-As-You-Go) budget scorecards, which are normally used to track government spending and revenue. This means that these effects are exempt from certain budget rules and calculations usually used to maintain fiscal responsibility.