Overview
Title
To limit eligibility for Federal benefits for certain immigrants, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The America First Act is a rule that tries to make sure the special help that the government gives, like money for health and schools, mostly goes to people who are U.S. citizens or who have permanent permission to live in the U.S. It also puts new rules for some people about getting money back at tax time, and it stops giving certain kinds of government help to people who aren't supposed to be living in the U.S. as citizens.
Summary AI
The America First Act limits eligibility for federal benefits for certain immigrants. It modifies existing laws to restrict non-citizens and specific groups, such as those with temporary protected status or deferred action, from accessing federal assistance programs including Medicaid, Medicare, housing support, education benefits, tax credits, and emergency services. The bill aims to ensure benefits are primarily available to U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, and it restricts federal funds for entities providing services to unauthorized immigrants.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, titled the "America First Act," seeks to significantly alter the way federal benefits are distributed to certain groups of immigrants within the United States. Introduced in the House of Representatives, the bill contains a range of measures aimed at restricting access to federal aid based on immigration status, redefining eligibility criteria, and reallocating funding away from areas designated as "sanctuary jurisdictions."
General Summary of the Bill
The "America First Act" primarily focuses on limiting federal benefits for non-citizens by tightening the existing eligibility criteria under various programs. The bill impacts federal public benefits, healthcare coverage under Medicare and Medicaid, educational resources, and housing assistance, among others. It also introduces stricter verification processes for citizenship and immigration status, particularly affecting those with temporary or deferred immigration statuses like DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), TPS (Temporary Protected Status), and others.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the most significant issues raised by the bill is its restriction of federal benefits for non-citizens, which could adversely impact vulnerable populations. The bill's narrowing of Medicaid and Medicare eligibility, especially for those under DACA or TPS, presents both ethical and public health concerns as it may limit access to essential healthcare services.
Moreover, the exclusion of Haitian entrants from resettlement services—while providing them to Cuban entrants—raises questions about fairness and potential discrimination. Similarly, reducing education funding by 50% for "sanctuary jurisdictions" might disproportionately affect resources in those areas without clear justification linked to educational outcomes.
Lastly, the bill complicates the tax code with changes to the child tax credit and earned income tax credit, potentially leading to administrative burdens and fiscal concerns due to increased government spending.
Broad Public Impact
The broader public might experience mixed outcomes from the bill. On one hand, proponents might argue that the bill prioritizes resources for U.S. citizens and aims to tighten immigration policies, which could align with certain political and national security interests. However, the potential negative impacts, particularly on healthcare access and educational resources in certain areas, could contribute to increased inequality and heightened community tensions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For immigrant communities, particularly those holding temporary statuses like DACA and TPS, the bill could present significant challenges. These groups may face reduced access to essential benefits and services, exacerbating socio-economic vulnerabilities. Healthcare providers, such as federally qualified health centers, might encounter increased complexity in delivering services due to the prohibition on serving certain non-citizen populations without federal funding.
Educational entities in "sanctuary jurisdictions" may suffer from reduced federal funding, possibly affecting school programs and resources. Conversely, tax-exempt organizations receiving federal aid may find the new restrictions limit their ability to deliver community services effectively, particularly in immigrant-dense areas.
In conclusion, while the "America First Act" seeks to address specific concerns about immigration and federal spending, it poses significant questions about the equitable distribution of resources and the broader social implications for diverse communities within the United States.
Financial Assessment
The America First Act involves several financial considerations, predominantly by restricting federal benefits and imposing new financial criteria for accessing certain credits and aid. These amendments reflect a broader immigration policy that prioritizes U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents in accessing federal resources.
Tax Credits and Financial Implications
A significant financial aspect of the bill appears in Section 6, which amends the child tax credit and the earned income tax credit. The bill increases the baseline amount of the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 and sets new income thresholds at $400,000 for joint filers and $200,000 for other filers. It limits the refundable portion of the child tax credit to $1,700 per qualifying child. Additionally, there is a provision for an adjustment of this amount for inflation starting after 2026. These changes aim to adjust support for taxpayers with children, yet the modifications could also increase governmental expenditure due to higher refunds.
Federal Funding Restrictions
Section 4 details restrictions on federal funding to Federally Qualified Health Centers that provide services to undocumented individuals. This ban extends to Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and Medicare, potentially depriving these centers of crucial funding. Such restrictions could diminish healthcare service availability for undocumented populations, raising ethical and public health concerns, as noted in the issues.
Impact on Education and Local Services
Section 9 and Section 8549D aim to reduce ESEA funding by 50% for sanctuary jurisdictions, which could severely reduce educational resources in these areas. This significant financial penalty might be perceived as a federal overreach. The potential decrease in state and local funding could jeopardize educational programs and resources, primarily affecting students in sanctuary cities and their access to quality education.
Community Development Block Grants
In Section 13, the bill prohibits using Community Development Block Grant funds to support services for certain immigrant groups. Such restrictions could significantly impact non-profit organizations that rely on these federal funds to aid immigrant communities. This amendment could hinder community development efforts and service accessibility in areas with significant immigrant populations, exacerbating social and logistical issues.
General Fiscal Concerns
The restrictions imposed by this bill signify a redirection of federal financial resources away from non-citizen groups, impacting various sectors including healthcare, education, and community development. This financial reallocation raises concerns about the administrative costs of implementing these changes and the broader fiscal effects on communities and service providers. While certain provisions, like adjustments to tax credits, aim to maintain financial support for U.S. families, the absence of comprehensive analysis on the fiscal impact poses potential financial risks and challenges to effective policy implementation.
Issues
The amendments in the bill significantly reduce the eligibility of non-citizens for Federal benefits under Section 2. This could adversely impact vulnerable populations and is politically and ethically contentious as it reflects broader debates on immigration policy.
Section 10's exclusion of Haitian immigrants from refugee resettlement services, while allowing it for Cuban entrants, could be perceived as discriminatory. This raises significant ethical and political concerns about equity in immigration policy.
Section 4 and Section 1899C limit Medicare and Medicaid coverage for parolees, TPS, and DACA recipients among other groups. This may be seen as discriminatory and can affect healthcare access for these groups, which raises ethical and legal concerns.
Section 9 and Section 8549D reduce ESEA funding for sanctuary jurisdictions by 50%, which could severely impact educational resources in these areas and may be seen as federal overreach in immigration enforcement.
The bill prohibits the use of federal funding by Federally qualified health centers that provide services to individuals not lawfully present in the U.S. (Section 4, subsection (e)). This could limit access to necessary healthcare services, raising both ethical and public health concerns.
The adjustments to eligibility for the child tax credit and earned income tax credit in Section 6 complicate the tax code and could lead to increased government spending. There is a lack of analysis on the fiscal impact of these changes, which poses financial concerns.
The restrictions on the use of Community Development Block Grants and Federal funding by tax-exempt organizations in Section 13 may hinder community support services in areas with high immigrant populations, raising ethical and logistical issues.
Section 11 changes terminology relevant to immigration status verification, which could lead to bureaucratic confusion and potential delays in benefit allocation, highlighting procedural and administrative issues.
Section 8 narrowly defines eligibility for postsecondary financial assistance based on immigration status but does not clarify other eligibility criteria or processes for verification, potentially leading to service access issues and implementation challenges.
The broad definition of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' in Section 9 and Section 8549D could lead to inconsistent enforcement and legal challenges, as the criteria are open to interpretation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the Act introduces the "America First Act" and outlines the topics covered, including eligibility for federal benefits, citizenship verification for various programs, limitations on refugee resettlement, and restrictions on funding for certain jurisdictions and organizations.
2. Adjusting eligibility of certain non-citizens for Federal public benefits under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, reducing the types of federal benefits that certain non-citizens can receive and narrowing the definition of a "qualified alien." It also removes specific categories of individuals, such as those paroled into the U.S. for less than a year, from being eligible for certain benefits.
3. Verification of citizenship by Head Start agencies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Head Start Act states that a child is not eligible for a Head Start program if they are not a U.S. citizen or a refugee and if their parent is unlawfully present in the U.S. or falls under certain immigration categories such as being granted asylum or temporary protected status. A related amendment removes the term "immigrant" from another section of the Act.
4. Eligibility for certain Federal health care benefits Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of a U.S. bill places restrictions on access to federal health care benefits like Medicaid, Medicare, and subsidies under the Affordable Care Act for certain groups including parolees, those with deferred action, asylum recipients, temporary protected status holders, and individuals granted withholding of removal. It also prohibits federal funding to health centers that serve people not lawfully present in the United States, except for emergency care.
1899C. Limiting Medicare coverage of parolees and TPS and DACA recipients Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Medicare coverage is limited for individuals who are parolees, recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) or Temporary Protected Status (TPS), and others with similar immigration statuses. This means these individuals are not eligible to enroll in or receive Medicare benefits.
5. Housing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section makes changes to housing laws, including who can get financial assistance and loans for housing. It removes certain immigration statuses from eligibility and ensures guidelines for these programs cannot be issued by the Secretary. It also disallows units from being classified as low-income if a disqualified individual lives there.
6. Identification requirements for child tax credit and earned income tax credit; permanent extension of certain temporary rules for child tax credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to increase the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 and adjusts the income limits for eligibility, with a maximum refundable credit of $1,700 starting in 2026, subject to inflation adjustments. It also clarifies identification requirements, such as providing social security numbers for taxpayers and dependents, imposes citizenship and lawful presence conditions for claiming the child and earned income tax credits, and addresses noncitizen exceptions.
Money References
- (a) Child tax credit.—Section 24 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking “$1,000” and inserting “$2,000”, (2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking subparagraphs (A) through (C) and inserting the following: “(A) $400,000 in the case of a joint return, and “(B) $200,000 in any other case.”, (3) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1)(B)(i), by striking “$3,000” and inserting “$2,500”, and (B) by adding at the end the following: “(4) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF REFUNDABLE CREDIT.— “(A) IN GENERAL.—The amount determined under paragraph (1)(A) with respect to any qualifying child shall not exceed $1,700, and such paragraph shall be applied without regard to subsection (h).
- “(B) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.— “(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a taxable year beginning after 2026, the $1,700 amount in subparagraph (A) shall be increased by an amount equal to— “(I) such dollar amount, multiplied by “(II) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which the taxable year begins, determined by substituting ‘2023’ for ‘2016’ in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
- “(ii) ROUNDING.—If any increase under this subparagraph is not a multiple of $100, such increase shall be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $100.”, (4) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following: “(e) Additional requirements.— “(1) IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—No credit shall be allowed under this section to a taxpayer who does not include on the return of tax for the taxable year— “(A) the social security number of the taxpayer (and, in the case of a joint return, the social security number of the taxpayer's spouse), “(B) with respect to any qualifying child, the name and the social security number of such qualifying child, and “(C) for purposes of subsection (h), with respect to any dependent of the taxpayer, the name and the social security number of such dependent.
- “(B) REQUIREMENTS.—The requirements described in this subparagraph are that the individual— “(i) shall be a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully present in the United States, and “(ii) may not be— “(I) an alien granted asylum under section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158), “(II) an alien granted parole under section 212(d)(5) or 236(a)(2)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5), 1126(a)(2)(B)), “(III) an alien granted temporary protected status under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1254a), “(IV) an alien granted withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3)), “(V) any nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)), “(VI) any alien granted deferred action or deferred enforced departure, including pursuant to the memorandum of the Department of Homeland Security entitled ‘Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children’ issued on June 15, 2012, or “(VII) an alien who has been issued an employment-based immigrant visa described in section 203(b) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)).”, and (5) by striking subsection (h) and inserting the following: “(h) Partial credit allowed for certain other dependents.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—The credit determined under subsection (a) shall be increased by $500 for each dependent of the taxpayer (as defined in section 152) other than a qualifying child described in subsection (c).
7. Federal Emergency Management Agency prohibitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) from spending its funds on certain activities, such as sheltering by non-federal entities for overcrowded migrant facilities, supporting the emergency food and shelter program for people encountered by Homeland Security, and providing assistance to individuals in the U.S. without legal status or various forms of temporary immigration relief.
8. Eligibility for postsecondary financial assistance based on immigration status Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In an amendment to the Higher Education Act of 1965, eligibility for postsecondary financial aid now requires applicants to be U.S. citizens, nationals, or permanent residents.
9. Reducing ESEA funding for sanctuary jurisdictions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows the Secretary of Education to cut education funding by 50% to states or political subdivisions identified as "sanctuary jurisdictions," which are areas that prevent law enforcement from enforcing federal immigration laws. The withheld funds will be redistributed to areas that do not have sanctuary status.
8549D. Funding reductions for Sanctuary jurisdictions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes how federal funding will be reduced by 50% for states or local areas deemed "sanctuary jurisdictions," which are places that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. The withheld funds will be given to other states or local entities that comply with federal immigration laws.
10. Limitation on refugee resettlement and other services for certain Haitian immigrants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends existing laws to exclude Haitian immigrants from the benefits given to "Cuban and Haitian entrants," limiting these benefits to only Cuban entrants in various provisions, including the Refugee Education Assistance Act of 1980 and the Social Security Act.
11. Prohibiting participation in Federal benefit programs until a satisfactory immigration status is verified Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section proposes changes to the Social Security Act to ensure that federal benefits are only provided to individuals after verifying their satisfactory immigration status through the Department of Homeland Security, instead of the old Immigration and Naturalization Service. It specifies that benefits cannot be given until evidence of legal immigration status is confirmed, allowing a limited time for individuals to prove their status.
12. Verification of citizenship for WIC and school meals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines new rules for the WIC program and school meal eligibility, stating that a child must be a U.S. citizen or a refugee to qualify. Additionally, the child's parent must not be unlawfully present in the U.S., although exceptions are made for certain types of legal immigration status like asylum or temporary protected status.
13. Restrictions on use of Community Development Block Grant funds and Federal funding by tax-exempt organizations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section prohibits the use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and other federal funding by tax-exempt organizations for providing monetary or material support to certain non-citizens, including those unlawfully present in the U.S., those on temporary protected status, and those under deferred action. If tax-exempt organizations provide such support, they risk losing their tax-exempt status for the year in which the support is given, with these rules taking effect after December 31, 2025.
14. Implementing regulations and guidance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The head of each relevant government agency is required to create rules and provide guidance to ensure the implementation of this Act and its amendments.