Overview

Title

To direct the Federal Communications Commission to establish a program to make grants to States for the deployment of broadband service in underserved areas by small business broadband providers, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The Local Telecom Expansion Act of 2024 is a plan to help people in places where the internet is slow or not available by giving money to little companies that can make internet faster and better. The idea is to give everyone a chance to have good internet.

Summary AI

H.R. 7452, titled the “Local Telecom Expansion Act of 2024,” aims to improve internet access in underserved areas by establishing a grant program run by the Federal Communications Commission. This program would provide financial support to States, which would then give subgrants to small business broadband providers to expand broadband services. Eligible providers must enhance internet speeds and ensure low latency for real-time use. The bill defines underserved areas as locations with limited broadband service options, with specific speed requirements.

Published

2024-02-23
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-02-23
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7452ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
640
Pages:
4
Sentences:
23

Language

Nouns: 218
Verbs: 38
Adjectives: 39
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 27
Entities: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.36
Average Sentence Length:
27.83
Token Entropy:
4.77
Readability (ARI):
16.48

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The proposed legislation, called the “Local Telecom Expansion Act of 2024,” aims to improve broadband access in underserved areas across the United States. Introduced in the House of Representatives, the bill directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to set up a grant program. These grants are intended for states to support small business broadband providers in deploying broadband services in areas that currently lack sufficient internet access. The focus is on ensuring that the internet service provided meets certain minimum speed and latency standards.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several concerns arise from the bill's current language:

  1. Ambiguity in Key Terms: Terms like "competitive basis," "underserved area," and "sufficiently low latency" are not specifically defined. This vagueness can lead to inconsistent interpretations and potentially favoritism in how grants are awarded and used.

  2. Lack of Oversight Mechanisms: The bill does not specify any accountability or oversight measures to ensure that states and subgrant recipients use the funds effectively. This absence might result in funds being misallocated or not achieving the bill’s intended goals.

  3. Undefined Eligibility Criteria: The criteria for state eligibility to receive grants are not detailed, allowing for broad interpretation and possible inconsistent application by the FCC.

  4. No Performance Metrics: There's a lack of specific performance indicators or metrics to assess the success of the programs funded under this bill, making it difficult to evaluate the initiative's effectiveness.

Potential Public Impact

If implemented effectively, this bill could significantly increase broadband internet access in underserved areas, which enhances educational, economic, and social opportunities for residents in those regions. Improved internet access can lead to better educational resources, the potential for remote work, and more robust local economies.

However, due to the outlined issues, such as the lack of clear definitions and oversight mechanisms, the bill may not fully realize its potential benefits. The risk of misallocated funds could lead to inefficiencies and there might be little visible change for citizens in need of improved internet access.

Impact on Stakeholders

Positive Impacts

  • Small Business Broadband Providers: These entities would potentially benefit from increased funding and expanded business opportunities in underserved regions. This program could provide the necessary capital to grow their operations and customer base.

  • Residents of Underserved Areas: Individuals in these communities stand to gain significantly from improved broadband services. Enhanced internet access can open up various opportunities for work, education, and access to healthcare information.

Negative Impacts

  • Potential for Mismanagement: Without clear criteria and oversight, there is a risk that funds may be allocated ineffectively, which could lead to public dissatisfaction and mistrust in government programs.

  • Inconsistent Implementation: If eligibility and award criteria are not specified, states may face challenges in meeting application requirements, which could delay or completely inhibit the intended progress of broadband deployment.

In conclusion, while the “Local Telecom Expansion Act of 2024” has the potential to make a notable difference in underserved areas by promoting internet service expansion, careful amendments and additional oversight are necessary to address the vagueness and potential pitfalls highlighted. By doing so, the legislation could work more effectively toward closing the digital divide and ensuring equitable access to vital online resources.

Issues

  • The definitions and criteria used in Section 2 for terms like 'competitive basis' and 'underserved area' are vague, potentially leading to ambiguous interpretations or favoritism in the grant and subgrant selection processes.

  • Section 2 lacks oversight or accountability mechanisms for how the States use the grants or subgrants, which could lead to ineffective use of funds or misallocation, raising significant concerns about financial responsibility.

  • The eligibility criteria for States outlined in Section 2 are not detailed, leaving interpretation open to the Commission, which could result in inconsistent application and potential bias, raising legal and ethical concerns.

  • Section 2 does not specify performance metrics or success indicators for small business broadband providers receiving subgrants, making it difficult to measure the program's effectiveness and potentially leading to inefficient use of taxpayer dollars.

  • The term 'sufficiently low latency' in Section 2 is not clearly defined, which might lead to varied interpretations and implementation challenges, potentially affecting the quality of service provided.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official short title is the “Local Telecom Expansion Act of 2024.”

2. Small business broadband provider grant program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a program established by the Federal Communications Commission to provide competitive grants to states, which then fund small business broadband providers to build broadband infrastructure in underserved areas. These providers must offer internet services with specific speed and latency standards, and the states receiving the grant must comply with application requirements set by the Commission.