Overview

Title

To establish a pilot program to provide financial and non-financial housing assistance to certain homeless individuals, to provide for a study of the effects of the pilot program, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The Youth Homelessness Guaranteed Income Pilot Program Act of 2024 is a plan to help homeless young people by giving them money every month to pay for things like rent and by offering other support, like finding a place to live or going to school, while also checking how all this help makes their lives better.

Summary AI

H.R. 7451 seeks to create a pilot program called the "Youth Homelessness Guaranteed Income Pilot Program Act of 2024," which focuses on providing financial and non-financial housing assistance to certain homeless young individuals in the U.S. The bill plans to offer various support services like housing navigation, financial coaching, and educational opportunities. It will also conduct a study on the effects of these services and financial assistance on participants' housing and economic outcomes. The program includes privacy protections and aims to avoid affecting participants' eligibility for other government benefits.

Published

2024-02-23
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-02-23
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7451ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
4,871
Pages:
27
Sentences:
94

Language

Nouns: 1,456
Verbs: 317
Adjectives: 279
Adverbs: 22
Numbers: 175
Entities: 271

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.47
Average Sentence Length:
51.82
Token Entropy:
5.40
Readability (ARI):
29.03

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 7451, titled the "Youth Homelessness Guaranteed Income Pilot Program Act of 2024," proposes the establishment of a pilot program aimed at alleviating homelessness among young people in the United States. It seeks to provide both financial and non-financial assistance to homeless individuals, particularly focusing on those under the age of 30. The program intends to offer services such as housing navigation, financial coaching, and tenant rights education. Additionally, select participants will receive monthly cash payments to help improve their living conditions. The bill also mandates a study to evaluate the program's effectiveness and outlines the formation of the National Youth Economic Advisory Council to guide the program's implementation and assessment.

Summary of Significant Issues

While the bill presents a well-intended initiative to combat youth homelessness, several notable issues arise. First, concerns about privacy loom large with the creation of a database of homeless individuals. The legislation provides scant details on protecting sensitive information and ensuring privacy, risking misuse or unauthorized disclosure of personal data.

The definitions used in the bill, like "historically marginalized communities" and "socially disadvantaged group," are broad. This lack of specificity may lead to inconsistent application of the program and potentially undermine its fairness and effectiveness.

Participant selection criteria are another area of concern. The process, which is described as relying on recommendations from an external partner and a council, lacks clarity. This vagueness may open the door to favoritism and reduce transparency in how individuals are chosen to receive aid.

Furthermore, the financial aspect of the program, which allows some participants to receive their payments in lump sums, could result in financial mismanagement if not carefully regulated. This has the potential to detract from the program's intended benefits and could raise ethical concerns.

Impact on the Public Broadly

The bill has the potential to significantly impact young individuals experiencing homelessness by offering necessary financial support and encouraging stability. By addressing systemic barriers to housing and employment, the program aims to improve economic and social conditions for a vulnerable population. This could lead to better long-term outcomes not only for individuals but also reduce broader societal costs associated with homelessness.

However, the bill's implementation details, especially concerning privacy and selection processes, raise concerns. Without clear protections and transparent administrative frameworks, public trust and acceptance of the program might be challenged. If successfully executed, it may serve as a model for future programs aimed at tackling homelessness in other demographics.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For young people experiencing homelessness, this program offers tangible hope and resources to improve their living conditions and future prospects. Financial assistance and support services could help remove significant barriers faced by these individuals.

Nonprofit organizations and academic institutions engaged in homelessness research could also benefit. They might gain access to valuable data, aiding further studies and interventions aimed at addressing homelessness and its root causes.

There are, however, potential drawbacks for government agencies tasked with implementing the program. The lack of clear guidelines and detailed protections could strain agency resources and affect their ability to effectively manage such programs. Additionally, stakeholders concerned with privacy rights might express opposition to the database component, fearing potential violations of personal privacy.

Overall, while H.R. 7451 presents a promising step toward reducing youth homelessness, details surrounding its implementation and privacy safeguards require careful attention to ensure its success and public support.

Financial Assessment

The bill H.R. 7451, known as the "Youth Homelessness Guaranteed Income Pilot Program Act of 2024," proposes the creation of a pilot program aimed at providing financial and non-financial assistance to certain homeless young individuals. By analyzing the specific sections related to financial references, we can better understand how these allocations may impact the program and any potential concerns.

Financial Allocations and Payments

A central feature of the proposed program is the issuance of monthly cash payments to participants. The bill specifically mandates that each member of the "payment-receiving group" would receive a monthly payment that is the greater of $1,400 or the adjusted fair market rent cost based on their location. This design intends to offer direct financial support to individuals struggling with homelessness, addressing immediate housing needs.

The bill also allows for a subset of participants to opt for a lump sum payment, covering up to the first 12 months of these payments in a single transaction. While this flexibility might provide substantial immediate relief for some, it also raises concerns, primarily regarding participant welfare and program integrity. The potential for financial mismanagement or even fraud could be amplified without adequate monitoring, which aligns with broader ethical and financial oversight concerns identified under the issues section.

Privacy and Compliance Concerns

Significant penalties are prescribed for the misuse of data related to the program, including fines of up to $25,000 for unauthorized disclosure of records containing individually identifiable information. The severity of these penalties underscores the importance of maintaining strict privacy standards. However, the outline of privacy protections is deemed insufficiently detailed, which poses a risk of misuse or unauthorized disclosure. This situation is problematic because the financial penalties, while substantial, rely on clear and enforceable privacy regulations, which the bill currently lacks.

Exemption and Potential Cost Concerns

The roles and responsibilities of the "External Partner" are crucial as this entity will assist in administering the program and conducting the study on its effects. However, the bill lacks specificity on the criteria for selecting this partner and the exact compensation terms, creating room for potential excessive costs and favoritism. Any financial inefficiencies arising from the partnership would directly impact the program's budget and may hinder its success.

Additionally, the bill's exemption of the Council from the Federal Advisory Committee Act could lead to reduced transparency and accountability. This exception raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding budgetary decisions impacting direct financial support to homeless youth. Full disclosure of these processes is necessary to ensure public resources are allocated effectively and equitably.

Conclusion

Overall, while H.R. 7451 sets forth ambitious financial support measures targeting youth homelessness, certain elements related to payment structures, privacy, partner selection, and transparency require more precise definitions. Adequate safeguards and clear guidelines will be critical to executing the program’s financial dream without succumbing to inefficiencies or potential abuses. Addressing these concerns would help ensure that the funds are used effectively and reach the intended beneficiaries, providing a path towards more stable and secure housing opportunities for vulnerable youth.

Issues

  • The creation of a database of homeless individuals in Section 4(b)(1) raises significant privacy concerns, especially related to the protection of personal information. The section prohibits the inclusion of sensitive information like citizenship status but lacks detailed procedural privacy protections, oversight of compliance, and clear accountability measures for database destruction.

  • The broad definitions in Section 3, such as 'historically marginalized communities' and 'socially disadvantaged group', may lead to ambiguity and inconsistent application in the pilot program. More specific criteria are needed to ensure fair implementation and to avoid misinterpretation.

  • The criteria used for selecting pilot program participants in Section 4(b)(2)(A) are vague, especially since they rely on undefined roles of the 'External Partner' and 'the Council'. This raises concerns about potential favoritism and lack of transparency in participant selection.

  • The regulations surrounding privacy protections in Section 4(d) are insufficiently detailed to ensure safeguarding of identifiable information, creating a risk of misuse or unauthorized disclosure, especially given the penalties outlined in Section 4(d)(4) for violations.

  • The option for participants to take payments as a lump sum in Section 4(c)(3)(B)(iii) could lead to financial mismanagement or fraud if not adequately monitored, raising ethical and financial concerns about participant welfare and program integrity.

  • The ambiguity in the selection criteria and payment structures in Section 5 for choosing the 'External Partner' and compensating them could lead to excessive costs and favoritism, impacting the financial transparency and accountability of the program.

  • The exemption of the Council from the Federal Advisory Committee Act in Section 6(k) could lead to reduced transparency and accountability, especially regarding conflicts of interest and decision-making processes which might raise ethical concerns.

  • The inclusion of undefined and potentially conflicting roles and responsibilities of the Council and Council Chair in Section 6 raises concerns about potential inefficiencies, favoritism, and lack of clarity in administrative processes and oversight mechanisms.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the "Youth Homelessness Guaranteed Income Pilot Program Act of 2024".

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The findings highlight that millions of young people in the U.S. experience homelessness each year due to barriers like racial discrimination and lack of affordable housing. They also point out that young people of color are disproportionately affected by poverty, and that economic changes, such as the gig economy and automation, are making it harder for young adults to find stable, upwardly mobile jobs.

3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section of the Act provides definitions for key terms such as "appropriate congressional committees," "certified community development financial institution," "Council," and "fair market rent," among others. These definitions clarify the specific meanings of these terms within the context of the legislation.

4. The Youth Homelessness Guaranteed Income Pilot Program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed Youth Homelessness Guaranteed Income Pilot Program aims to assist young homeless individuals by establishing a database to identify eligible participants and providing them with various support services such as housing navigation, financial coaching, and education on tenant rights. The program includes cash payments for a select group of participants, maintains strong privacy protections, and ensures that participation does not impact eligibility for other benefits.

Money References

  • — (i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall make a payment to each member of the payment-receiving group every month for the duration described in paragraph (1), with each monthly payment in the amount equal to or the greater of $1,400 or the adjusted fair market rent cost for the member involved.
  • (4) VIOLATIONS.— (A) Any person who, by virtue of an official position or affiliation with the Secretary, the Council, or the External Partner— (i) has possession of, or access to, any record containing individually identifiable information the disclosure of which is prohibited by or under this Act; and (ii) knowingly discloses such a record to any person or agency not entitled to receive the record, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $25,000.
  • (B) Any person who knowingly requests or obtains any record related to the pilot program from the Secretary, the Council, or the External Partner under false pretenses shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $25,000. (e) Relationship to other programs, benefits, and laws.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law: (1) Participation in the pilot program, including the receipt of program payments, may not be considered for the purposes of determining— (A) the eligibility of a participant for, or the amount or timing of, any benefit or assistance under any Federal program or under any State or local program financed, in whole or in part, with Federal funds; or (B) whether a participant is a public charge under section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(4)) or section 237(a)(5) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(5)). (2) For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, gross income shall not include any program payment to a participant. (3) Section 401 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1611) shall not apply to this Act. ---

5. Study Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the Secretary, with the help of an experienced External Partner, will conduct a study on the effects of a pilot program, focusing on areas like housing, economic outcomes, and health of participants. It includes selecting an External Partner within 270 days, data collection, and requires interim and final reports to Congress on the findings of the study.

6. National Youth Economic Advisory Council Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes the National Youth Economic Advisory Council, which advises the Secretary on issues related to the homeless youth pilot program, such as selecting participants and partners, and recommends how to improve the program. The Council is composed of diverse members from various organizations, meets quarterly or as needed, and will submit reports on its activities before terminating 30 days after a specified report is submitted by the Secretary. Members are compensated for their time and travel, unless they are federal employees, and the Council is not subject to typical federal advisory committee rules.