Overview
Title
To amend the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 to permit the construction of certain noise barriers with funds from the Highway Trust Fund, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 7429 wants to use special road money to build walls that keep homes quieter from highway noise, and some of these walls might also help with things like solar energy. It also wants the walls to look nice, but figuring all this out can be tricky.
Summary AI
H. R. 7429 seeks to amend the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 to allow the utilization of funds from the Highway Trust Fund for building specific noise barriers. This bill permits the construction or preservation of Type II noise barriers under certain conditions, such as when barriers separate highways from residential areas or when the areas were developed before highway approval. It also introduces the concept of multipurpose noise barriers, which can serve additional beneficial functions like supporting renewable energy infrastructure. Additionally, the bill requires consideration of aesthetics in the design of noise barriers.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill titled "Negating Neighborhood Noise Act of 2024" proposes amendments to the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995. The primary focus of the bill is to allow certain funds from the Highway Trust Fund to be used for constructing noise barriers—specifically, Type II noise barriers—which are typically built to address noise issues in already developed areas. The bill outlines scenarios under which these funds can be utilized, includes provisions for multipurpose noise barriers, and emphasizes the consideration of aesthetics in constructing these barriers.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues emerge from the language and provisions of this bill:
Complex Terminology: The use of specialized terms like "Type II noise barrier" might not be easily understood by the general public, potentially leading to confusion and inconsistent application of the rules.
Arbitrary Cut-off Date: The stipulation that projects approved before November 28, 1995, are not eligible for funds raises questions about the fairness of the cut-off date and whether it's aligned with contemporary needs.
Bias Against New Developments: By limiting noise barriers to areas where structures are at least 10 years old, the bill might unintentionally bias against newer developments that could also benefit from noise mitigation measures.
Vague Definitions for Multipurpose Uses: The bill allows for noise barriers to accommodate secondary uses, such as renewable energy or broadband infrastructure, but it lacks clear definitions, which might lead to inconsistent implementation across states.
State-Level Approval Variability: Granting states the authority to approve these secondary uses could result in heterogeneity, where different states apply the rules in varied ways, creating potential inequalities.
Subjective Interpretation of Aesthetics: The mandate to consider aesthetics might result in subjective judgments, possibly leading to increased costs or delays in projects without clear guidance on balancing aesthetics with other objectives.
Impact on the Public
The bill has the potential to positively affect communities residing near highways by addressing noise pollution more comprehensively. By allowing certain funds to be used for constructing Type II noise barriers, neighborhoods could become quieter, improving the overall quality of life.
However, the impact will largely depend on the clarity of implementation and fairness in eligibility for these noise barriers. The arbitrary cut-off date and age requirement could leave some communities without needed noise mitigation options. Additionally, the focus on aesthetics without clear priority guidelines could drive costs higher, as projects might need to incorporate more expensive design elements.
Impact on Stakeholders
Local Communities: The most direct impact is on residential areas suffering from highway noise. Older neighborhoods adjacent to highways may benefit significantly from newly constructed barriers, especially if they qualify under the bill's stipulations. However, newer developments might feel neglected due to the age restrictions imposed.
State Governments: States are given significant power under the bill, particularly regarding the approval of multipurpose noise barriers. This could be positive for states seeking to innovate and implement environmental or economic utilities along highways. However, states might also face challenges if they lack guidance or resources to fit the infrastructure needs.
Infrastructure Developers: Developers and contractors in the noise barrier sector could see increased opportunities as projects expand to include secondary uses. Nonetheless, they might encounter additional complexity from the bill's loose definitions and need to conform to aesthetic guidelines.
Renewable Energy and Broadband Companies: These sectors might find opportunities in the secondary beneficial uses of noise barriers, which can host energy or communication infrastructure. However, success depends on the interpretation and enforcement of these provisions by state governments.
Overall, while the bill seeks to address the long-standing issue of highway noise pollution, the effectiveness of its provisions will depend greatly on clear implementation guidelines and fair application in a variety of community contexts.
Issues
The definition and use of the term 'Type II noise barrier' in Section 2 could create confusion and varying interpretations due to its specialized nature, potentially leading to inconsistent application of the law.
The cut-off date of November 28, 1995, for the approval of projects in Section 2 raises questions about fairness and relevance to current needs, potentially excluding more recent important projects from funding.
The criteria requiring structures to be at least 10 years old in Section 2 could introduce bias against newer developments and might unfairly deny them needed noise protection.
In Section 4, the introduction of 'multipurpose noise barriers' is broad and vague, particularly concerning what qualifies as 'secondary beneficial use', which could lead to inconsistent implementation across states.
State-level approval of secondary beneficial uses for multipurpose noise barriers in Section 4 might create variability in execution depending on state discretion, potentially leading to unequal treatment and application of the law.
The requirement for considering aesthetics in Section 5 might lead to subjective interpretations that increase costs or cause delays, without clear guidelines on balancing aesthetics with cost and functionality.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill provides its short title, stating that it may be referred to as the "Negating Neighborhood Noise Act of 2024".
2. Permitting use of highway trust fund for construction of certain noise barriers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill changes the rules so that generally, Highway Trust Fund money cannot be used to build certain noise barriers on highways. However, there are exceptions allowing this type of barrier if it wasn't part of an approved project before November 28, 1995, if the barrier is needed for areas that were already significantly developed before highway construction, or if it’s to separate a highway from older residential areas.
3. Eligibility for surface transportation block grant funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends Section 133 of Title 23 in the United States Code to allow surface transportation block grant funds to be used for planning, designing, preserving, or building noise barriers, following certain federal regulations. It also updates another part of the law to include these new provisions.
4. Multipurpose noise barriers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that noise barriers funded by certain federal programs can serve multiple purposes, such as hosting renewable energy or broadband infrastructure, with state approval for these additional uses. It defines a "multipurpose noise barrier" as one that offers extra benefits beyond noise reduction, like environmental or economic advantages.
5. Aesthetics Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Project sponsors working on noise barriers under certain federal regulations must take into account how these barriers look, following guidelines from the Federal Highway Administration's latest Noise Barrier Design Handbook.