Overview
Title
To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to provide cost-recovery authority for the Department of the Interior.
ELI5 AI
The bill H.R. 7422 is about making sure the government gets paid back for the money it spends helping people use underground heat from the Earth to make energy. It also asks for a report to see how well this plan works in five years.
Summary AI
The bill H.R. 7422 aims to amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to allow the Department of the Interior to recover costs from those who hold geothermal leases. It permits the Secretary of the Interior to require leaseholders to reimburse the United States for the costs associated with processing applications and monitoring geothermal activities, such as drilling and construction. The bill also provides guidelines for adjusting reimbursement amounts based on economic hardship or to promote the use of geothermal resources. Additionally, it mandates a report within five years to assess the impact of these amendments on the geothermal program.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, H.R. 7422, titled the "Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2024," aims to amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970. The primary objective of this amendment is to grant the Department of the Interior the authority to recover costs associated with the processing and monitoring of geothermal leases. The bill allows the Secretary of the Interior to require holders of geothermal leases to reimburse the costs incurred by the government. These costs cover various aspects, including processing applications and monitoring operations related to geothermal energy. The authority for cost recovery is set to expire on September 30, 2031. Additionally, the bill mandates the submission of a report by the Secretary of the Interior within five years to evaluate the amendment's impacts on the Bureau of Land Management’s geothermal program.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary concerns with the bill is the subjectivity of terms such as "reasonable administrative and other costs." This vagueness may lead to inconsistent interpretations, resulting in either insufficient cost recovery from leaseholders or excessive charges. Furthermore, the bill grants the Secretary of the Interior the discretion to adjust reimbursement obligations based on subjective criteria like "economic hardship" and "greatest use of geothermal resources," potentially leading to biased application or favoritism.
Another issue arises from the timeline specified for the report submission. Allowing a five-year window before the report is due may delay necessary improvements or adjustments to the geothermal program. Moreover, the bill lacks clarity on the criteria or metrics to be used in assessing the effectiveness of the amendments, which might result in ambiguous findings.
Lastly, the process for gathering input from industry stakeholders is not clearly defined, raising concerns about whether it will be inclusive and unbiased. The absence of clear guidelines for monitoring the reimbursed funds could lead to their potential mismanagement.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill could impact energy consumers by affecting the development and utilization of geothermal resources, a renewable energy source. By allowing the government to recover costs, the bill might encourage more efficient processing of geothermal lease applications and better oversight of operational compliance. This could potentially lead to a more robust geothermal energy sector, contributing to energy diversification and sustainability.
However, if not carefully implemented, the cost-recovery measures could place financial burdens on smaller geothermal operators, possibly discouraging investment and innovation in the field. Such outcomes could ultimately slow down the growth of geothermal energy projects, impinging on broader efforts to transition to renewable energy sources.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For geothermal leaseholders, particularly smaller companies or startups, the ability of the Secretary to demand cost recovery might impose significant financial pressures. Without clear criteria for determining economic hardship, these entities could face challenges in managing their financial responsibilities to the government. Larger companies might be better positioned to negotiate favorable contributed funds agreements, potentially creating an uneven playing field.
For environmental advocates, the bill represents a mixed bag. While increased cost recovery could lead to more rigorous oversight and adherence to environmental standards, the risk of discouraging smaller, innovative companies could slow the transition to cleaner, renewable geothermal energy.
From a governmental perspective, the bill presents an opportunity to ensure that the costs associated with leasing and monitoring are equitably shared between the government and private companies. However, it also poses challenges in maintaining transparency and fairness in the cost-recovery process.
In sum, while the "Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2024" sets the stage for enhanced management of geothermal leases, careful implementation and ongoing oversight will be crucial to ensure that it fulfills its potential benefits without imposing undue hardships on key stakeholders.
Issues
The term 'reasonable administrative and other costs' in Section 2 is subjective and may lead to varying interpretations, potentially resulting in either insufficient recovery or overcharging. This could have financial implications for leaseholders and the government.
The authority given to the Secretary in Section 2 to adjust reimbursement levels based on 'economic hardship' and 'greatest use of geothermal resources' is subjective. This could lead to inconsistent application and potential favoritism or bias towards certain geothermal leaseholders.
The provision in Section 2 allowing for potential favoring of organizations that enter into a contributed funds agreement with the U.S. could create an uneven playing field among geothermal leaseholders, raising concerns of fairness and equity.
Section 3 specifies a timeline of 'not later than 5 years' for the report, which may delay addressing necessary changes or improvements to the geothermal program, potentially impacting policy effectiveness.
Section 2 lacks a specific definition or criteria for 'economic hardship', leading to potential misuse or arbitrary decisions in reimbursement adjustments.
The absence of clear guidelines in Section 2 on how reimbursed funds should be monitored or audited could lead to mismanagement or misuse of funds, affecting financial accountability.
Section 3 does not specify what criteria or metrics will be used to assess the amendments' impact on the geothermal program, leading to potential ambiguity and undermining the report's effectiveness.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the Act, stating that it can be officially referred to as the “Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2024”.
2. Cost recovery from geothermal leasing and permitting Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 allows the Secretary of the Interior, until September 30, 2031, to require geothermal lease holders to pay back the costs that the U.S. incurs while processing their applications and monitoring their operations. The Secretary can decide to reduce these costs if it would be too hard financially on the lease holders or to encourage more use of geothermal resources. Any repayments received will be used to cover application processing and operational monitoring costs.
3. Report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to prepare and publish a report, within 5 years of the act's passage, evaluating the impact of specific amendments on the Bureau of Land Management's geothermal program. The report must assess the achievements of the program, suggest any necessary updates, and involve opinions from the geothermal industry and other stakeholders.