Overview
Title
An Act To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to provide cost-recovery authority for the Department of the Interior.
ELI5 AI
The bill lets a government department charge for help in watching over companies using hot water and steam from the ground, making sure everything is fair and good until 2031. They need to check how it's working after a few years and report on it.
Summary AI
H.R. 7422, also known as the “Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2024,” aims to amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970. It grants the Department of the Interior the authority to charge fees to companies for the administrative costs and monitoring activities related to geothermal leases until September 30, 2031. The bill specifies criteria for determining these fees and allows for potential fee reductions under certain circumstances. Additionally, it requires a report on the impact of these amendments on the geothermal program within five years.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
House Bill 7422, also known as the "Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2024," is a legislative proposal aimed at amending the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970. The bill is designed to allow the U.S. Department of the Interior to recover costs associated with the leasing, permitting, and inspection of geothermal resources. This cost-recovery authority is set to expire on September 30, 2031. Additionally, the bill mandates a report within five years to evaluate the impact of these changes and suggest further actions.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill lies in its language regarding cost recovery for geothermal leasing and activities. The term "all reasonable administrative and other costs" is broad and lacks a clear definition. This ambiguity may lead to disputes over what costs are considered reasonable, potentially imposing financial difficulties on applicants and holders of geothermal leases. The Secretary of the Interior is given discretion to adjust reimbursements based on economic hardship or to encourage geothermal resource use, yet the criteria for these adjustments are not clearly defined, leaving room for arbitrary decision-making.
Furthermore, the bill does not outline a process for leaseholders or applicants to contest or appeal reimbursement decisions, which could lead to legal challenges. The potential influence of cooperative cost-share agreements on reimbursement is also vaguely addressed, leading to further uncertainty.
In terms of oversight, the bill requires a report on the changes' impacts and recommendations for the future. However, the timeline for the report is up to five years, which may delay necessary adjustments to the program. The term "stakeholders" is used without specification, leading to potential gaps in consultation. There is also no mechanism in place to ensure that any recommendations from the report are acted upon.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, the bill's focus on cost recovery from geothermal activities is part of a broader push for efficient management and use of natural resources. By recouping the expenses incurred in managing these resources, the Department of the Interior aims to alleviate financial burdens on taxpayers. However, the lack of clarity regarding cost definitions and adjustments might become contentious, leading to broader public debates on energy policy and resource management.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The stakeholders most directly affected by this bill include companies and individuals involved in geothermal energy production. While the intention is to streamline costs for government administration, the vague language around cost recovery may result in increased financial obligations for these entities. If the Secretary's discretion is applied inconsistently, it could lead to perceptions of unfair treatment, potentially stifling investment and innovation in the geothermal sector.
On the positive side, the bill's allowance for reducing cost reimbursements could encourage greater utilization of geothermal resources, supporting efforts to expand renewable energy solutions. However, without clear criteria, the implementation could be unpredictable, affecting stakeholders' strategic planning and operations.
In summary, while H.R. 7422 aims to improve the efficiency and sustainability of geothermal leases through cost recovery, its success in doing so depends on the resolution of critical ambiguities and procedural gaps. To maximize its positive impact, clear definitions, transparent processes, and stakeholder consultation are necessary.
Issues
The broad interpretation of 'all reasonable administrative and other costs' for cost recovery in Section 2 could lead to disputes and economic hardship, as there's a lack of clear definition on what constitutes 'reasonable' costs. This might have significant financial implications for geothermal leaseholders.
The discretion granted to the Secretary in Section 2 to adjust reimbursements based on economic hardship or to promote geothermal resource use lacks clear criteria, raising potential issues of fairness and arbitrary decision-making.
Section 2 does not specify the process for contesting or appealing reimbursement decisions, which could lead to legal challenges and dissatisfaction among geothermal lease applicants or holders.
The provision in Section 2 for the potential impact of cooperative cost-share agreements on reimbursements is not clearly detailed, leading to ambiguity regarding their terms and formation.
Section 2 outlines that the reimbursement authority expires on September 30, 2031, but lacks clarity on future policy, creating uncertainty for stakeholders.
In Section 3, the five-year delay for reporting on the results of the cost-recovery amendments may prevent timely adjustments and improvements to the geothermal program.
The term 'stakeholders' in Section 3 is vague, potentially leading to insufficient consultation with necessary parties in the assessment of the program's impact.
Section 3 lacks a mechanism to ensure that the report's recommendations are acted upon, which may result in the report having limited practical impact.
The absence of interim reports or checkpoints in Section 3 could make the reporting ineffective in tracking the progress of amendments over a five-year period.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the Act, stating that it can be officially referred to as the “Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2024”.
2. Cost recovery from geothermal leasing, permitting, and inspections Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
During the period from enactment to September 30, 2031, the Secretary may require those applying for or holding geothermal leases to pay back the U.S. government for certain costs, such as processing applications or inspections, but may adjust these costs if they cause financial hardship or to encourage geothermal resource use. Any reimbursed amounts will be used by the Department of the Interior for related administrative activities, as allowed in future budget allocations.
3. Report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of the Interior must prepare a report within 5 years about the impact of recent changes to the geothermal program, including recommendations for future legislation and improvements. This report will be shared with specific Congressional committees and made available to the public.