Overview
Title
To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to direct the Election Assistance Commission to conduct ongoing studies of State programs for recruiting poll workers and providing poll workers with safety training in order to identify voluntary considerations for carrying out such programs, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7413 is about helping states learn better ways to find and train the people who help out at voting places by keeping them safe. It asks a group to study how different states do this and share good ideas that everyone can use.
Summary AI
H.R. 7413, named the "Election Worker Recruitment and Safety Act," seeks to amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002. The bill directs the Election Assistance Commission to regularly study state programs that recruit and train poll workers, focusing on safety. It aims to identify voluntary practices that states can use to improve these programs. Additionally, it allows states to use certain federal funds to implement these voluntary considerations starting in fiscal year 2025.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill aims to amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002. Its primary focus is on improving the recruitment and safety training of poll workers. The legislation tasks the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) with conducting ongoing studies of state programs related to poll worker recruitment and training. These studies will identify voluntary considerations for improving such programs. Reports on these studies will be submitted every two years starting from December 2024. Additionally, states will be allowed to use federal payments to implement the voluntary recommendations identified by the EAC, starting from fiscal year 2025.
Summary of Significant Issues
A key issue identified in the bill is the ambiguity surrounding the term "voluntary considerations." This vagueness might lead to differences in how states interpret and implement these considerations, potentially causing uneven improvements in poll worker recruitment and safety training across the country. Another concern is the lack of oversight and accountability measures for the EAC's studies, which could lead to inefficiencies. The bill also does not specify a budget or a funding source for these studies, raising questions about financial support and commitment. Additionally, the two-year interval between reports may not be adequate to address rapidly changing needs. Furthermore, there is a lack of precise definitions and criteria, such as for terms like "poll worker," which may result in inconsistent application of the law's provisions.
Impact on the Public
The bill's intention to enhance the recruitment and safety training of poll workers could positively impact the public by potentially leading to more efficient and secure election processes. Safer and well-trained poll workers might enhance voter confidence in the electoral system, contributing to the perceived legitimacy of election outcomes. However, if states do not uniformly apply the voluntary considerations, there could be disparities in how effectively elections are administered across different regions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
States & Election Officials: The bill places a responsibility on state election officials to consider voluntary suggestions from the EAC studies. However, without mandates, states have the discretion to implement or disregard suggestions, which could lead to inconsistencies in election management practices.
Election Assistance Commission: The EAC will face the challenge of carrying out these studies without a specified budget or oversight measures, potentially affecting the quality and effectiveness of their work.
Poll Workers: Poll workers might benefit from improved safety training and recruitment practices, making the role more accessible and safer. However, without specific guidelines or mandates, improvements could be inconsistent.
Voters: Voters could see varying impacts based on local election administration improvements influenced by the voluntary considerations. Disparities in how states apply these recommendations could affect voter access and experiences at polling places.
Overall, while the bill aims to strengthen the election process through improved poll worker programs, its success will likely depend on how states choose to apply the suggestions and how effectively the EAC manages its new responsibilities.
Issues
The term 'voluntary considerations' in both Section 2 and Section 247 is vague, potentially leading to inconsistent implementation across states. Without clear guidelines or mandates, states may choose very different approaches, resulting in disparities in poll worker recruitment and safety training across the country.
Section 2 and Section 247 lack oversight or accountability measures for the Election Assistance Commission in conducting these studies. This absence could lead to inefficiencies or unchecked spending, affecting the effectiveness and integrity of the program.
Section 247 does not mention a budget or funding source for the Election Assistance Commission to conduct the studies. Without financial clarity, there is a risk of either insufficient funding or lack of commitment to carry out the necessary studies.
The report frequency set to every two years in Section 247 might not be sufficient to address rapidly changing needs or issues related to poll worker recruiting and safety training. More frequent updates could provide more timely insights and adjustments.
In Section 247, the term 'poll worker' could benefit from further clarification to ensure it encompasses all relevant roles and responsibilities. Without precise definitions, implementation could be inconsistent or incomplete.
Section 2 does not specify criteria for determining 'voluntary considerations,' leading to potential ambiguity in how these considerations are identified and applied. This lack of specificity might inhibit the effective strengthening of state programs.
The renaming and clerical amendment process in Section 2 could lead to confusion if not properly communicated to all stakeholders involved in election administration. Clear communication and documentation are essential to avoid administrative errors.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that the Act can be officially referred to as the “Election Worker Recruitment and Safety Act.”
2. Studies of State programs for poll worker recruiting and safety training Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill introduces a requirement for ongoing studies by the Commission to examine state programs for recruiting and training poll workers in safety, offering voluntary suggestions to improve these programs, with reports due every two years. Additionally, it allows states to use federal payments to implement these voluntary recommendations starting in fiscal year 2025.
247. Ongoing studies of State programs for poll worker recruiting and safety training Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the Commission to continuously study state programs for recruiting and training poll workers in safety measures, aiming to find helpful suggestions for states. By the end of 2024, and every two years after, the Commission must report these findings, including any recommended considerations, to the states.