Overview

Title

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of an individual from assignment to a medical personnel position of the Armed Forces on the basis of the amputation of the individual, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill says that people who have lost a limb should be allowed to work in medical jobs in the military, as long as they can still do the job, just like everyone else.

Summary AI

H.R. 7405, titled the "Hannah Cvancara Service Act," seeks to amend title 10 of the United States Code to ensure that individuals are not excluded from being assigned to medical positions in the Armed Forces simply because they have an amputated limb. The bill mandates that, as long as these individuals meet the necessary physical fitness and other required standards, they cannot be disqualified from medical roles due to amputation, whether the limb loss was due to a service-related condition or not.

Published

2024-02-16
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-02-16
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7405ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
404
Pages:
3
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 128
Verbs: 28
Adjectives: 19
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 14
Entities: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.32
Average Sentence Length:
57.71
Token Entropy:
4.53
Readability (ARI):
31.36

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, H. R. 7405, seeks to amend title 10 of the United States Code to ensure non-discrimination against individuals who have amputations when they seek medical personnel assignments within the Armed Forces. This bill comes under the name “Hannah Cvancara Service Act.” The essence of the bill is to prevent the automatic exclusion of such individuals from these roles solely based on their amputations, provided they meet the necessary physical fitness and other prescribed standards.

General Summary of the Bill

The bill aims to integrate individuals with amputated limbs into medical personnel positions in the Armed Forces if they fulfill specific physical fitness and other standards. It ensures that the basis for such exclusion is not arbitrary and highlights the need for fair assessment of every candidate irrespective of their physical conditions caused by amputations. Furthermore, the bill also seeks to clarify the use of certain legal terminology related to medical personnel and service-connected conditions.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues with the current drafting of the bill need addressing:

  1. Lack of Clarity in Standards: The bill does not detail how the necessary physical fitness and other standards are to be determined, which could lead to inconsistent application across different military branches.

  2. Undefined Key Terms: The term "amputation" remains undefined in the legislation, potentially leading to varied interpretations and misunderstandings about who may be qualified for protection under this policy.

  3. Absence of Appeal Processes: There is no structured procedure for appeals or dispute resolution if individuals with amputations feel wrongfully denied a position. This absence could lead to legal ambiguities and challenges.

  4. Need for Accommodations: The bill does not consider whether special accommodations or support systems are necessary to help individuals with amputations meet the required standards, raising concerns regarding equal treatment.

  5. Complex Legal References: The bill refers to other sections of the U.S. Code for definitions, which might be confusing for those unfamiliar with these legal texts, potentially leading to misinterpretations.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

For the broader public, the bill represents a progressive step towards inclusivity and equality within the Armed Forces. It highlights a shift in policy that aligns with broader societal movements towards accommodating diversity and ensuring non-discrimination in various sectors.

For individuals with amputations, this legislation could open pathways to career opportunities that were previously limited by physical conditions. As such, these individuals might find new roles and a greater sense of purpose and inclusion within the military setting.

For the military, the bill could bring positive changes by promoting a diverse and respectful work environment that values the unique capabilities of all individuals, including those with physical disabilities. However, the ambiguity in the bill’s current form may usher in legal, administrative, and training challenges if the standards and terms are not uniformly and clearly defined.

Conclusion

Overall, the Hannah Cvancara Service Act resonates with an ethos of inclusivity and fairness. However, to fully realize its intended benefits and mitigate any potential for misapplication or legal disputes, the bill must address its current ambiguities and ensure that clear, consistent standards and processes are established. Such measures will be vital to safeguard the interests of all parties involved and ensure equal opportunities within the Armed Forces.

Issues

  • Section 2, § 989: The section does not specify how the physical fitness and other standards are determined, potentially leading to inconsistencies in how individuals with amputations are evaluated for medical personnel positions. This lack of clarity may create legal challenges if the standards are applied unevenly.

  • Section 2, § 989: The failure to define 'amputation' could lead to differences in interpretation, causing confusion about who qualifies for protection under this statute. This ambiguity could have significant legal implications.

  • Section 2, § 989: There is no mention of appeal or dispute resolution processes for individuals who believe they meet the required standards but are denied assignment. This omission might lead to ambiguity in enforcement and could necessitate further legal clarification.

  • Section 2, § 989: The potential need for additional support or accommodations for individuals with amputations is not addressed, which raises ethical concerns about equal treatment and access.

  • Section 2, § 989: The references to terms defined in other sections (115a(e) and 101 of title 38) could make it harder for readers unfamiliar with these sections to fully understand the text, potentially leading to misinterpretation of the bill's provisions.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section states that the official name of the Act is the “Hannah Cvancara Service Act”.

2. Prohibition on exclusion of individuals from assignment as medical personnel of Armed Forces on basis of amputation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends a law to make sure that people with amputations are not prevented from being assigned to medical positions in the Armed Forces if they meet the necessary fitness and other criteria, regardless of whether the amputation was related to military service. The law clarifies that this applies to assignments as medical staff, using definitions from other legal sections.

989. Prohibition on exclusion of individuals from assignment as medical personnel on basis of amputation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits the Secretary of Defense and the respective service secretaries from barring individuals with amputated limbs from being assigned to medical personnel roles in the Armed Forces, provided the individuals meet the necessary physical fitness and other required standards. It clarifies that "medical personnel" and "service-connected" have specific legal definitions.