Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow for tax-advantaged distributions from health savings accounts during family or medical leave, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 74 is a bill that wants to let people use their special health savings money without paying extra taxes when they take time off from work to care for someone or because they're sick. It also wants to let more people save more money in these accounts without needing a specific kind of health plan.
Summary AI
H. R. 74 seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code to allow individuals to make tax-advantaged withdrawals from their health savings accounts (HSAs) during times when they are on family or medical leave. The bill defines these periods as "qualified caregiving" and excludes related distributions from being included in gross income. Additionally, this bill proposes removing the requirement for account holders to have a high-deductible health plan in order to contribute to an HSA and increases the maximum contribution limit to $9,000, or $18,000 for joint returns. These changes aim to make it easier for families to use HSAs to support themselves during caregiving periods.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed bill, known as the “Freedom for Families Act,” aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The primary focus of the bill is to allow for tax-advantaged distributions from Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) during periods of family or medical leave. Additionally, it proposes removing the requirement for individuals to have a high-deductible health plan to qualify for an HSA. It also seeks to increase the contribution limits to these accounts.
Summary of Significant Issues
A notable issue with the bill is the loosely defined term "period of qualified caregiving," which could lead to different interpretations and applications. This lack of clarity may affect how individuals can utilize their HSAs during caregiving periods. Furthermore, although the bill eliminates the need for a high-deductible health plan to open an HSA, it fails to specify what constitutes an eligible plan, potentially increasing the risk of individuals choosing insufficient health coverage.
Another significant change is the substantial increase in contribution limits to HSAs, allowing individuals to contribute up to $9,000 and joint filers up to $18,000. Such increases may primarily benefit higher-income individuals, raising questions about equity. Lastly, the bill's effective date provisions might lead to confusion over how quickly these changes will be applied, affecting taxpayers and administrators alike.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill appears to provide more flexibility for individuals during periods of family and medical leave by allowing them to access HSA funds without incurring tax penalties. This could ease the financial burden on those taking unpaid leave. However, the ambiguity surrounding what constitutes qualified caregiving might create difficulties for individuals trying to claim these benefits.
Moreover, by removing the high-deductible plan requirement, the bill may offer more individuals the opportunity to open HSAs. However, without clear guidelines on what other plans are eligible, people could be at risk of inadequate health coverage, potentially leading to higher out-of-pocket expenses.
Impact on Stakeholders
For families experiencing medical leave or caregiving situations, this bill could provide much-needed financial relief. Access to untaxed HSA funds during such critical periods could improve their economic security. Nonetheless, stakeholders should be mindful of the potential confusion around eligibility and requirements, as misinterpretations might lead to unforeseen tax implications.
On the other hand, higher-income individuals stand to benefit the most from increased HSA contribution limits, as they are more likely to have the means to maximize such contributions. This raises concerns about fairness, as lower-income individuals may not have the same capacity to benefit from these changes.
Administrative bodies, such as the IRS, might face challenges implementing these changes due to the potential confusion regarding the effective dates and altered provisions. Ensuring a smooth transition will be crucial to prevent compliance issues and guarantee taxpayers can reap the intended benefits of the bill.
Financial Assessment
The proposed bill, H. R. 74, aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code with significant changes related to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). It chiefly offers individuals the ability to make tax-advantaged withdrawals from HSAs during times of family or medical leave, referred to as "qualified caregiving." This bill also introduces certain financial modifications impacting contributions to HSAs.
Tax-Advantaged Distributions
The bill defines a "period of qualified caregiving" as a time when an individual is on leave for reasons that align with the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. During these periods, any amount withdrawn from an HSA for qualified caregiving purposes would not be included in the beneficiary's gross income. This promotes financial flexibility by allowing individuals to use their HSA funds without facing tax penalties when on family or medical leave, potentially easing financial burdens during these times.
Removal of High-Deductible Health Plan Requirement
The legislation proposes removing the requirement that HSA holders must have a high-deductible health plan. This change is set to broaden eligibility, making HSAs more accessible. However, the lack of alternative plan criteria or minimum coverage standards could lead to confusion and increased financial risk, as beneficiaries may choose plans that do not sufficiently meet healthcare needs. This shift responds to the critique of offering HSAs only to those able to opt for high-deductible plans, yet it raises questions about ensuring adequate coverage.
Contribution Limit Increases
Significantly, the bill boosts the maximum contribution limit to $9,000 for individuals and $18,000 for joint returns. This increase aims to provide families with more opportunity to save tax-free for health-related expenses and caregiving needs. However, this change could disproportionately favor higher-income individuals who have the capacity to maximize these contributions, hence raising equity and fairness concerns. It's important to note that expanding these limits may further entrench fiscal benefits for those already financially capable of a larger outlay.
Effective Date Considerations
Both Sections 2 and 3 introduce changes that prospectively apply to taxable years or months starting after the bill's enactment. The possibility of varied implementation dates might lead to uncertainty for both taxpayers and tax administrators, complicating the transition towards these new rules. Timely and clear guidance from tax authorities would be necessary to navigate these potential compliance challenges.
Complexity of Tax Exclusions
The revised criteria for including or excluding amounts in gross income, dependent on whether they are used for qualified medical expenses or qualified caregiving, may introduce complexity for beneficiaries. Those without tax expertise may find it difficult to fully leverage these financial benefits, suggesting a need for clear, supportive resources to aid in understanding these provisions.
These proposed financial adjustments reflect broader policy aims of enhancing familial support through facilitating more accessible financial tools. However, they also highlight a spectrum of administrative and equity challenges that merit careful deliberation and potentially further legislative refinement.
Issues
The potential broadness and lack of explicit definitions for 'period of qualified caregiving' in Section 2 could lead to misinterpretations and inconsistent application. This ambiguity may result in unintended financial or legal consequences for health savings account (HSA) beneficiaries, impacting their financial well-being during caregiving situations.
In Section 3, the removal of the requirement for a high-deductible health plan for HSA eligibility without specifying alternative eligible plans or setting minimum standards may lead to confusion and potentially increase financial risks for individuals selecting health plans that do not adequately cover their healthcare needs.
The increase in contribution limits for health savings accounts to $9,000 for individuals and $18,000 for joint returns as outlined in Section 3 is substantial and could require justification. This change might disproportionately benefit higher-income individuals who can afford to contribute the maximum amount, raising concerns about fairness and equity.
The effective date provisions in both Sections 2 and 3 could lead to confusion. The amendments apply to taxable years or months in taxable years beginning after the date of enactment, which may cause uncertainty about the immediate impact on taxpayers and administrators, potentially resulting in compliance issues.
The exclusion and inclusion criteria regarding gross income in Section 2, with reference to 'qualified medical expenses' and 'qualified caregiving', may be complex for individuals without tax expertise. This complexity might hinder taxpayers from fully understanding and effectively utilizing these tax benefits.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it will be called the "Freedom for Families Act."
2. Distributions from health savings accounts during periods of qualified caregiving Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section modifies the Internal Revenue Code to allow distributions from health savings accounts (HSAs) to be tax-free if used for medical expenses or during qualified caregiving periods, which are when someone is on leave due to reasons outlined in the Family and Medical Leave Act. It also updates relevant parts of the law to align with these changes, which apply to tax years after the law's enactment.
3. No high deductible health plan required for health savings accounts Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the rules for health savings accounts (HSAs), removing the need for a high deductible health plan to qualify and increasing the contribution limit to $9,000 (or $18,000 for joint returns). These changes will apply to taxable years starting after the enactment of the Act.
Money References
- — (1) Section 223(b) of such Code is amended by striking paragraphs (7) and (8). (2) Section 223 of such Code is amended by striking subsection (c). (c) Increase in contribution limit for health savings accounts.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking “the sum of the monthly” and all that follows through “eligible individual” and inserting “$9,000 (twice such amount in the case of a joint return)”. (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— (A) Section 223(b) of such Code is amended by striking paragraphs (2), (3), and (5) and by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (6) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively. (B) Section 223(b)(2) of such Code (as redesignated by subparagraph (A)) is amended by striking the last sentence. (C) Section 223(d)(1)(A)(ii) is amended by striking “the sum of” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “the dollar amount in effect under subsection (b)(1).”. (D) Section 223(g)(1) of such Code is amended— (i) by striking “Each dollar amount in subsections (b)(2) and (c)(2)(A)” and inserting “The dollar amount in subsection (b)(1)”; (ii) by striking “thereof” and all that follows through “‘calendar year 2003’.” and inserting “‘calendar year 1997’.”; and (iii) by striking “under subsections (b)(2) and (c)(2)(A)” and inserting “under subsection (b)(1)”. (d) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to months in taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.