Overview
Title
To establish cooperative agreements for wildland fire research, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill is about helping people understand and control wildfires better by using information from satellites in space, and it wants the Secretary of Agriculture to work together with schools to make this happen. It's like asking big brains from different places to team up and use technology to keep forests safe from fires.
Summary AI
H.R. 7362, known as the “Satellites Preventing Agricultural Crises and Emergencies Act of 2024” or the “SPACE Act of 2024,” proposes a plan for the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture to create partnerships with universities for research on wildland fires. The goal is to use satellite data to predict and control these fires, focusing on areas like smoke detection and resource deployment. The bill mandates the sharing of research results and requires a report on expanding these collaborations and using technology such as drones. It also calls for a comprehensive review of resources needed for implementing advanced fire prediction and management strategies using satellite and remote sensing technologies.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The bill titled "Satellites Preventing Agricultural Crises and Emergencies Act of 2024" or "SPACE Act of 2024" seeks to establish cooperative agreements for advancing wildland fire research. Introduced in the House of Representatives, it mandates the Secretary of Agriculture to work with land-grant colleges and universities. These partnerships aim to leverage satellite data to predict, control, and mitigate wildland fire risks. The bill also requires the Agriculture Secretary to report to Congress on expanding research collaborations and resource distribution improvements.
Significant Issues Highlighted in the Bill
Several issues arise from the proposed bill:
Criteria Clarity: The bill does not clearly define which land-grant colleges and universities have the "demonstrable capacity" for wildland fire research. This lack of specificity might lead to favoritism or unequal opportunities among potential research partners.
Data Sharing Concerns: While promoting the utilization of satellite data, the bill lacks detailed conditions and legal frameworks governing the sharing of this data. This could pose legal challenges or lead to the misuse of sensitive information.
Privacy Issues: The bill's use of commercial data acquisitions fails to mention necessary measures for data privacy or protection, potentially leading to consumer privacy concerns and legal disputes.
Administrative Burden: The requirement for recipient institutions to share research findings without clear compliance guidelines could impose significant administrative burdens, potentially leading to inefficiencies.
Objective Measurement: The term "increased frequency" of remote sensing instruments is ambiguous, lacking precise metrics to ensure effective monitoring and goal achievement.
Bureaucratic Complexity: Vague language about "other Federal departments or agencies" might introduce unnecessary complexity and duplication of effort, hindering effective coordination.
Lack of Benchmarks: There is no definition of benchmarks or success indicators in the report that the Agriculture Secretary must submit, which could impede proper program evaluation.
Impacts on the Public
The bill aims to enhance wildland fire management, which could result in better-preparedness and responsiveness to fire outbreaks. This is particularly relevant given the increasing frequency and severity of wildfires, impacting public safety, health due to smoke, and economic losses. If effectively implemented, communities, particularly those in wildfire-prone areas, could benefit from advanced forecasting and mitigation strategies.
Impacts on Stakeholders
Academic Institutions: Land-grant colleges and universities stand to gain significantly. They will have access to satellite data and research funding, fostering academic and scientific advancements. However, this comes with challenges related to administrative compliance and data management.
Federal Agencies and Departments: These bodies might face increased responsibilities coordinating with educational and research institutions, which, if not positively managed, could lead to overlapping efforts and resource misallocation.
General Public and Local Communities: By aiming to improve fire prediction and management, the bill has the potential to enhance community safety, lower the risk of property damage, and reduce environmental degradation.
Privacy Advocates and Legal Experts: They may express concerns over the lack of specific data privacy provisions, advocating for amendments to better protect sensitive information.
In summary, while the bill proposes forward-thinking initiatives to address wildland fires, it necessitates careful refinement to provide clear criteria, legal frameworks, and benchmarks, ensuring its successful implementation and widespread benefits.
Issues
The criteria for 'land-grant colleges and universities' with 'demonstrable capacity' are not clearly defined, potentially leading to favoritism or unequal opportunities (Section 2). This lack of clarity could result in bias or inequitable distribution of cooperative agreements.
The language requiring the Secretary of Agriculture to make satellite data available to recipient institutions lacks specificity on terms, conditions, and legality (Section 2). This could lead to legal challenges or misuse of data, affecting the bill's implementation.
There is no specific mention of measures to ensure data privacy or protection when using commercial data acquisitions, which could lead to privacy concerns (Section 3). This omission could result in public backlash and legal challenges related to data privacy.
The provision requiring recipient institutions to share their research and reports might impose a significant administrative burden without clear guidelines on compliance (Section 2). This could result in inefficiencies or failures in meeting the bill’s objectives.
The term 'increased frequency' related to remote sensing instruments is subjective and needs quantification to ensure clear objectives and measurement (Section 3). Without clear metrics, the bill’s goals may not be effectively monitored or achieved.
The language describing 'other Federal departments or agencies' is vague, potentially resulting in unnecessary bureaucratic complexity or duplication of efforts (Section 3). This could hinder effective coordination and resource utilization, slowing progress toward objectives.
The report to be submitted by the Secretary of Agriculture lacks specific benchmarks or success indicators for the expansion of wildland fire research cooperative agreements (Section 2). This absence of benchmarks may prevent proper evaluation of the program’s success or failures.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Act mentioned in this section is officially called the “Satellites Preventing Agricultural Crises and Emergencies Act of 2024” and is also known as the “SPACE Act of 2024.”
2. Establishing cooperative agreements for wildland fire research Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section instructs the Secretary of Agriculture to create partnerships with specific colleges and universities to research methods to predict and manage wildland fires using satellite data. These institutions will share their findings, and the Secretary will report to Congress about potential improvements in these research collaborations and resource distributions within a year.
3. Report on satellite-driven wildland fire research Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Agriculture is tasked with submitting a report to Congress within 180 days that outlines the resources and timeline needed to use satellite and drone technology for wildland fire management, provides recommendations for deploying aerial resources like drones, discusses the potential of remote sensing tools to monitor vegetation and moisture levels, and estimates the cost of these efforts.