Overview
Title
To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disapprove courses of education offered by a public institution of higher learning that does not charge the in-State tuition rate to a veteran using certain educational assistance under title 10 of such Code.
ELI5 AI
In this bill, the government wants to make sure that schools charge veterans the same lower price as local students. It also wants to put a limit on how much money veterans can use for special flying lessons so they don’t have to pay too much on their own.
Summary AI
H.R. 7323 proposes changes to U.S. law to ensure that public colleges and universities charge veterans the in-state tuition rate if they use certain types of educational assistance. The bill specifies which chapters of educational assistance it applies to and includes a plan for modifying existing rules about tuition for flight training under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. Furthermore, it sets limits on the amount of educational assistance that can be used for flight training programs beginning in August 2025. The bill also mandates the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disapprove any courses from public institutions that fail to comply with these tuition requirements.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, known as the "Montgomery GI Bill Selected Reserves Tuition Fairness Act of 2024," seeks to modify certain educational provisions for veterans. Introduced in the 118th Congress, this bill aims to ensure that veterans receive fair educational benefits and support by focusing on two main areas: tuition rates for public higher learning institutions and the limits on financial assistance for flight training.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill primarily addresses the education benefits for veterans in two specific ways. First, it mandates that public higher educational institutions charge in-state tuition rates to veterans who use certain educational assistance programs. This part of the bill, set to take effect on August 1, 2024, aims to provide tuition fairness to veterans, recognizing their service. Secondly, the bill imposes a cap on the amount payable for flight training under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program, establishing a maximum payment amount of $108,480 starting in the academic year beginning August 1, 2025. The bill also outlines adjustments based on annual percentages to ensure the cap remains relevant over time.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill raises several notable issues. The provision to cap flight training benefits at $108,480 could potentially burden veterans if this amount does not cover the full cost of certain programs. Additionally, while adjusting the cap by an annual percentage seems reasonable, it may not accurately reflect the real cost of flight training, which could either undervalue or overvalue the necessary adjustments.
Moreover, requiring public institutions to provide in-state tuition rates, irrespective of the student's actual residency, might be seen as an imposition on state control over their education systems and finances. The inclusion of "chapter 1606 of title 10" in various places in the legislation can also lead to confusion, especially for readers who might not be familiar with such legal references.
Impact on Public and Stakeholders
Broad Impact on the Public:
For the general public, this bill might signal a heightened commitment to supporting veterans in achieving their educational goals. Ensuring in-state tuition rates for veterans using certain benefits could mean more accessible and affordable education for those who have served, which might be viewed positively by the wider community that values veteran support.
Impact on Veterans:
For veterans, gaining access to in-state tuition rates can significantly reduce the financial burden of higher education, potentially leading to more veterans enrolling in and completing their education. However, the cap on flight training benefits might limit opportunities for those pursuing careers in aviation if the amount falls short of covering all necessary expenses.
Impact on Public Institutions:
Public institutions of higher education, particularly those in states with high out-of-state tuition rates, may face financial challenges as they are pressed to provide in-state rates to veterans. This could lead to budgetary adjustments, potentially affecting other services offered by these institutions.
Impact on Educational Program Providers:
Providers of flight training programs could face shifts in enrollment dynamics if veterans find the capped amount insufficient, possibly leading to changes in how these programs are marketed and structured. This situation might incentivize flight schools to adapt their pricing strategies to accommodate the financial constraints faced by veterans using these benefits.
In summary, while the bill aims to enhance educational support for veterans, which is widely supported, its particular provisions may lead to mixed reactions among stakeholders due to financial implications and administrative complexities.
Financial Assessment
The proposed legislation, H.R. 7323, primarily focuses on ensuring that veterans are charged in-state tuition rates at public institutions. It includes provisions for amending financial aspects of educational assistance, particularly in the context of flight training.
Financial Provisions in the Legislation
The bill seeks to establish a financial limit on the entitlement to educational assistance for flight training programs. Specifically, it sets a cap of $108,480 for tuition and fees for individuals beginning such programs in the academic year starting August 1, 2025. This financial ceiling is significant because it determines the maximum amount payable under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program for flight training.
Issues with the Financial Cap
The imposition of a financial cap on flight training assistance addresses the potential issue of cost overruns in such specialized programs. However, this cap might not fully cover the costs associated with high-end or extensive flight training programs, potentially leading veterans to incur out-of-pocket expenses. This limitation could place a financial burden on veterans who may need comprehensive training to pursue a career in aviation.
Adjustment Mechanism
The bill also provides a mechanism for adjusting the financial cap annually. The maximum total amount payable can be increased each academic year based on the percentage increase calculated under another section of the U.S. Code, specifically section 3015(h). This mechanism raises concerns because the adjustments may not accurately reflect the real-world cost changes in flight training programs. If the cost of flight training increases at a different rate than the adjustment calculations, this could either inadequately cover cost increases or exceed them unnecessarily, affecting the economic support provided to veterans.
Impact on Educational Choices
By capping financial assistance at a specified amount, the bill indirectly influences the educational decisions of veterans. Veterans who may require more than one round of training or wish to pursue multiple flight training programs could find themselves financially constrained by the maximum amount payable. This could deter veterans from pursuing more comprehensive or sequential training programs essential for their professional development in aviation.
In-State Tuition Requirement
While the provision mandating in-state tuition rates for veterans using specific types of educational assistance does not directly involve an appropriation or financial allocation, it carries financial implications for public institutions. These institutions may face reduced revenue from tuition, potentially leading to budget adjustments to accommodate the change.
In summary, the financial aspects of H.R. 7323 aim to provide structured and predictable financial support to veterans seeking flight training under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. However, the cap and its adjustment mechanism could result in financial inadequacies, potentially impacting veterans' educational opportunities and financial commitments.
Issues
The provision in Section 3 that sets a maximum total amount payable for flight training under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program may potentially burden veterans. The cap of $108,480 might not adequately cover the costs of certain flight training programs, which may result in additional out-of-pocket expenses for veterans. This is significant as it affects the financial burden on veterans seeking flight education.
Section 2 requires public institutions of higher learning to charge in-state tuition rates to veterans using specific educational assistance programs. This may be controversial as it dictates tuition policies at public institutions, potentially leading to debates about state autonomy and the financial impact on such institutions.
The repeated amendments in Section 2 to include 'chapter 1606 of title 10' in various parts might create confusion for readers, particularly those who are unfamiliar with the legal references. This raises concerns about the accessibility and comprehensibility of the legislation for the general public.
The effective date language in Section 2 lacks clarity about how the amendments will be implemented or monitored post-enactment. This could lead to uncertainty regarding compliance and enforcement mechanisms by educational institutions.
Section 3 introduces a limitation that an individual may not receive more than the maximum total amount of educational assistance for flight training, regardless of the number of programs pursued. This could discourage veterans from pursuing multiple necessary programs within their career paths and might limit their educational opportunities.
The methodology for annual percentage increase adjustments based on section 3015(h) may not accurately reflect actual changes in costs of flight training programs (Section 3). This poses a risk that the adjustments could be either insufficient or excessive, impacting the financial aid available to veterans.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Montgomery GI Bill Selected Reserves Tuition Fairness Act of 2024 is the official title given to this legislative act.
2. Department of Veterans Affairs disapproval of courses offered by public institutions of higher learning that do not charge veterans in-state tuition rate for purposes of selected reserve educational assistance program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section changes the law to ensure that veterans get in-state tuition rates when using certain educational assistance programs, including a new group entitled to such benefits under chapter 1606 of title 10, starting from August 1, 2024.
3. Limitation on amount of entitlement to educational assistance payable for flight training under Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program of Department of Veterans Affairs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill changes rules about using educational benefits for flight training through the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. Starting August 1, 2025, there is a maximum amount of money that can be paid for flight training each year, and if someone receives less than this maximum, they may be eligible for additional assistance to make up the difference.
Money References
- (a) In general.—Section 3313 of title 38, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (g)(3)(C), by striking “In the case” and inserting “Subject to the limitation under subsection (m), in the case”; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(m) Limitation on use of entitlement for flight training.—(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter and subject to paragraph (2), the maximum total amount payable under this chapter for tuition and fees in the case of an individual pursuing a degree-granting or non-degree-granting program of flight training offered by a public institution of higher learning is— “(A) in the case of an individual who first pursues such a program during the academic year beginning on August 1, 2025, $108,480; and “(B) in the case of an individual who first pursues such a program during any subsequent academic year, the amount in effect under this subsection for the previous academic year beginning on August 1, as increased by the percentage increase equal to the most recent percentage increase determined under section 3015(h) of this title. “(2) An individual who receives educational assistance under this subsection may not receive more than the maximum total amount in effect under paragraph (1) with respect to the individual, regardless of when the individual pursues the program of flight training or how many such programs the individual pursues.