Overview

Title

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance the operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in foreign countries, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

This bill wants to help U.S. border officers work better with other countries to stop bad things like drugs and terrorism from coming into America. It allows them to team up with other countries' police and help people in emergencies while making sure they use the money responsibly.

Summary AI

H. R. 7311 aims to enhance U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) operations in foreign countries by amending the Homeland Security Act of 2002. It allows CBP employees and customs officers to engage in joint operations with officials from other countries, focusing on issues such as tracking and stopping illegal drugs, smuggling, terrorist threats, and other security risks. The bill also permits CBP to support emergency humanitarian and law enforcement capacity-building efforts abroad, with provisions for handling claims for damages related to these operations.

Published

2024-02-09
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-02-09
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7311ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
571
Pages:
4
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 183
Verbs: 35
Adjectives: 27
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 20
Entities: 44

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.35
Average Sentence Length:
38.07
Token Entropy:
4.74
Readability (ARI):
21.50

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed bill, introduced in Congress as H.R. 7311, aims to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to bolster the capacity and scope of operations for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in foreign countries. Formally titled the “Combatting International Drug Trafficking and Human Smuggling Partnership Act of 2024," this legislation seeks to authorize CBP to collaborate with foreign governments to monitor illegal activities, provide emergency humanitarian support, and enhance law enforcement capabilities. The bill would also allow the use of allocated funds to address claims for damages related to CBP activities abroad.

Significant Issues

Several potential issues arise from this bill:

  1. Vague Terminology and Oversight Concerns: The bill uses broad language such as "appropriate government officials" and "other threats to the security or economy of the United States," which lack clear definitions. This vagueness could lead to unauthorized actions or misinterpretation of what constitutes a threat, potentially resulting in inefficient use of resources.

  2. Financial Implications: There is a provision allowing the expenditure of funds to settle claims for damages incurred during operations abroad. This could lead to increased government spending, with little to no oversight or limits, raising concerns about fiscal responsibility and efficiency.

  3. Overlap with Existing Initiatives: The bill's objectives might overlap with current international anti-drug and anti-terrorism efforts, potentially causing duplication of work and insufficient coordination among various agencies involved in similar missions globally.

Impact on the Public

If enacted, this bill could have broad implications for the general public. By enhancing CBP capabilities abroad, there may be a strengthened response to international drug trafficking and human smuggling, potentially reducing these threats before they reach U.S. borders. This could enhance national security and public safety, offering peace of mind to citizens concerned about cross-border crime.

However, the risks include potential misuse of taxpayer money due to the bill’s vague provisions for spending and accountability. Without stringent oversight, there is a possibility of inefficient use of funds, ultimately impacting public trust in government spending and efficiency.

Impact on Stakeholders

Positive Impacts

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection: CBP could benefit from expanded authority and operational scope, potentially leading to more effective interventions against drug trafficking and smuggling networks.

  • Foreign Governments: Partnering countries may gain improved law enforcement capacity and support in addressing illegal activities, which could bolster bilateral relations and foster collaboration on security matters.

Negative Impacts

  • Government Accountability and Watchdog Groups: These entities may be concerned about the lack of specific oversight mechanisms, leading to potential challenges in monitoring government expenditure and actions.

  • U.S. Taxpayers: There is a potential for fiscal waste without clear guidelines and limitations on the expenditure of public funds, affecting taxpayer confidence in how their money is utilized.

Overall, while the bill presents opportunities to enhance national and international security, it carries risks related to implementation and oversight that necessitate careful examination and, potentially, further refinement to ensure effective and responsible governance.

Issues

  • The provision for payment of claims for money damages using funds appropriated for U.S. Customs and Border Protection operations (SEC. 2.(C)) lacks clear limits or oversight, potentially leading to increased government spending which could be viewed as wasteful if not properly monitored.

  • The language allowing joint operations with 'appropriate government officials' from foreign countries (SEC. 2.(4)(A)) is vague, lacking a clear definition of 'appropriate government officials,' potentially leading to unauthorized or inappropriate collaborations.

  • The broad and undefined terms 'other threats to the security or economy of the United States' (SEC. 2.(4)(B)(i)(IV)) could result in expansive interpretations and suggest a risk of unfocused or inefficient use of resources, diverting attention from pressing threats.

  • The unclear specification of 'law enforcement capacity-building efforts' (SEC. 2.(4)(B)(iii)) may lead to duplication of existing efforts or misallocation of funds, raising efficiency and resource allocation concerns.

  • There is potential overlap with existing international anti-drug and anti-terrorism initiatives, which might cause redundant spending or effort without clear coordination mechanisms, leading to inefficiencies in governmental collaboration and resource deployment.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this bill states the short title, which officially names it the “Combatting International Drug Trafficking and Human Smuggling Partnership Act of 2024.”

2. Enhancing the operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in foreign countries Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

U.S. Customs and Border Protection is allowed to assist foreign governments in efforts like monitoring illegal activities, responding to emergencies, and building law enforcement capabilities as long as there is an agreement between the U.S. and the foreign country. They can also use allocated funds to settle claims for damages related to their operations in other countries.