Overview
Title
To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the time of imprisonment for an additional offense involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7277 is a bill that wants to make sure people who do bad things to others because of their race, color, religion, or where they come from, and get caught more than once, will have to spend more time in jail. This means if someone does a mean crime like this again after getting in trouble the first time, they will get punished more.
Summary AI
H.R. 7277, also known as the "Halt Hate Act of 2024," proposes amendments to the United States Code, specifically to increase penalties for hate crimes. It seeks to extend the time of imprisonment for those who commit a second offense involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin. The bill modifies Section 249(a)(1)(B) of title 18 by adding a provision that covers individuals who have previously been convicted of similar hate crimes, reinforcing the penalties for repeated offenses. The legislation was introduced in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, referred to as the "Halt Hate Act of 2024," aims to amend certain sections of title 18 of the United States Code. The primary objective of this amendment is to increase the penalties for repeat offenders who commit crimes motivated by bias against a person's race, color, religion, or national origin. Specifically, the bill seeks to amend Section 249 of title 18, which deals with federal hate crimes, by adding a provision that takes into account prior convictions related to hate crimes or state felonies motivated by similar biases.
Significant Issues
One of the notable issues with this amendment is the complexity of its language, which may make it difficult for individuals without legal expertise to understand how these changes affect them or the legal system. The amendment references prior convictions but does not clearly explain the potential implications for sentencing or legal outcomes. This omission leaves room for ambiguity regarding how the amended law will be enforced.
Additionally, the broad reference to state felony offenses without specifying which types of crimes are included or how they align with federal guidelines introduces the risk of inconsistency. This could lead to varying interpretations and applications of the law across different states, potentially resulting in unequal treatment under the law.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to provide greater deterrence against hate crimes by imposing harsher penalties on repeat offenders. If implemented effectively, this could lead to a decrease in such crimes, fostering a more inclusive and safer society. However, the complexity of the legal language and the uncertainty surrounding the implications of prior convictions might limit public understanding and engagement with the legislation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For those involved in the legal system, such as lawyers and judges, the bill introduces additional considerations in how cases are prosecuted and judged, particularly concerning prior convictions. However, without clear guidelines, it may lead to challenges in consistent implementation.
For marginalized communities frequently targeted by hate crimes, the bill could symbolize a stronger commitment to their protection. Yet, the effectiveness of this commitment might be compromised if the law is not transparently and uniformly applied.
Law enforcement and prosecutors might face challenges in interpreting and applying the new provisions, especially when coordinating between state and federal jurisdictions. This could also have an impact on the accused, as inconsistent applications can lead to uncertainty in legal proceedings.
In conclusion, while the "Halt Hate Act of 2024" has the potential to enhance protections for vulnerable populations, its successful implementation will require clear communication and consistent application of its provisions across jurisdictions. Addressing the ambiguities in the bill could ensure that all stakeholders are adequately informed and prepared to enforce the law's intentions.
Issues
The amendment's legalistic language and complexity may hinder laypersons' understanding, making it difficult for the general public to fully grasp the implications of the changes mentioned in Section 2.
Section 2 modifies existing law by referencing prior convictions without explaining sentencing implications or legal outcomes, leaving important aspects of its application unclear to the public and legal practitioners.
By broadly referencing State felony offenses in Section 2, the amendment fails to specify which offenses align with federal guidelines, potentially leading to inconsistencies and confusion in application across different jurisdictions.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill specifies its short title, stating that it can be referred to as the "Halt Hate Act of 2024."
2. Previous hate crime acts Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text describes amendments to Section 249(a)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code. It specifies changes to include that a defendant can be charged if they have been previously convicted under this hate crime law or if they committed a state felony due to someone's race, color, religion, or national origin.