Overview
Title
To amend the Public Health Service Act to authorize grants to support schools of nursing in increasing the number of nursing students and faculty and in program enhancement and infrastructure modernization, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "FAAN Act" is like giving schools money to help teach more nurses and get better classrooms and teachers, especially in places where there aren't enough doctors. It wants to spend $1 billion, which is a big number, to make sure more people can learn to be nurses and help others stay healthy.
Summary AI
H.R. 7266, also called the "Future Advancement of Academic Nursing Act" or "FAAN Act," aims to amend the Public Health Service Act to support nursing schools in the U.S. The bill proposes grants for increasing the number of nursing students and faculty, especially in medically underserved and rural areas, with a focus on diversity and program modernization. Schools receiving grants can use the funds to enhance student enrollment, hire diverse faculty, modernize educational infrastructure, and create clinical education partnerships. The bill seeks $1 billion in funding and includes provisions for reporting on the progress and effects of these initiatives.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, titled the "Future Advancement of Academic Nursing Act" or the "FAAN Act," seeks to amend the Public Health Service Act to foster growth in the nursing sector. This legislation focuses on authorizing grants to nursing schools with the aim of expanding faculty and student numbers, modernizing educational programs, and enhancing infrastructure. It particularly emphasizes support for schools located in underserved or rural areas. The goal is not only to address current nursing workforce shortages but also to prepare for potential public health emergencies.
General Summary of the Bill
The FAAN Act proposes a framework for allocating grants to nursing schools to increase their capacity to educate more nurses and improve their facilities. It prioritizes schools serving medically underserved and rural areas, aiming to tackle workforce shortages by supporting the recruitment and retention of both students and faculty. With an authorized budget of $1 billion, the Act empowers the Secretary of Health to distribute funds while keeping in mind equitable distribution across different U.S. regions. The act also mandates that recipient schools submit annual progress reports, and requires the Secretary to submit a comprehensive five-year report to Congress summarizing the grant outcomes.
Summary of Significant Issues
One significant issue with the bill is the lack of specified budget limits for individual grants, potentially leading to unequal or unchecked allocation of funds. Additionally, the criteria for selecting grant recipients may require further clarity to ensure equitable distribution of resources. The bill entrusts considerable discretionary power to the Secretary in determining which activities to fund, which raises concerns over potential ambiguous decision-making.
The reporting requirements are vaguely defined, risking inconsistencies in how the effectiveness of the funding is measured. There are also concerns about potential biases in awarding grants to certain geographic or demographic groups without clear justification. Furthermore, the mechanism for resolving possible conflicts of interest, especially regarding partnerships with healthcare facilities, is not explicitly outlined.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill's impact could be significantly positive by addressing the nationwide nursing shortage, potentially reducing healthcare burdens, and improving public health readiness. Increasing the number of trained nurses, especially in underserved areas, promises to enhance healthcare access and quality.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For nursing schools, this legislation could lead to much-needed financial relief and modernization of educational facilities, which can help attract more students and faculty. However, schools not located in priority areas might struggle to compete for these grants, leading to disparity in funding allocation.
Students and potential nursing faculty stand to benefit as the bill promotes increased access and support for disadvantaged groups. Yet, the success of these benefits hinges on the transparent execution of the grant allocation process.
Healthcare providers in underserved areas may experience a positive ripple effect as increasing the local nursing workforce could improve patient care delivery. Conversely, the bill's emphasis on certain regions might inadvertently overlook other pressing needs in non-priority locales.
The FAAN Act presents an opportunity to significantly strengthen the nursing workforce across the United States, provided that its implementation is handled with transparency and fairness. Addressing the identified issues and ensuring balanced resource distribution will be crucial to maximizing its positive impact.
Financial Assessment
The bill, known as the "Future Advancement of Academic Nursing Act" or "FAAN Act," outlines a financial commitment to support the enhancement and expansion of nursing education in the United States.
Financial Allocations
Appropriation of Funds
The bill authorizes an appropriation of $1 billion to be used for grants aimed at supporting nursing schools. This funding is primarily directed towards increasing the number of nursing students and faculty, modernizing educational programs, and addressing workforce shortages. The funds are designated to remain available until they are completely expended, which means there is no immediate expiration date attached to the spending of these funds.
Issues Related to Financial Allocations
Unspecified Caps on Spending
One significant issue with the bill is the absence of specified budget caps or limits for individual grants. While the bill secures a total funding of $1 billion, it does not detail how much each grant could potentially be. This open-ended financial structure could lead to disproportionately large expenditures for certain schools or regions without adequate checks, creating a risk of fiscal mismanagement.
Prioritization Criteria
The bill mentions that priority for grants will be given to schools in medically underserved areas, health professional shortage areas, or rural areas. However, these terms are not defined within the document itself, which could lead to ambiguity in the distribution of funds. Additional documents may be necessary to fully understand these criteria, suggesting that the allocation of funds may not be as straightforward as intended.
Broad Discretionary Powers
The bill provides the Secretary of Health and Human Services with broad discretionary power to determine the use of grant funds, allowing for activities that they deem to further the development of nursing schools. This broad mandate, without clear guidelines, could lead to diverse interpretations and uses of the funds, potentially creating inconsistency in how the money is applied across different institutions.
Potential Impact on Grant Distribution
Geographical and Demographic Distribution
The bill calls for an "equitable distribution of awards among the geographic regions of the United States." However, the term "equitable" is subjective, and without specific guidelines, there could be disputes or perceptions of unfairness in how funds are allocated. Furthermore, the intent to focus on diversity and underserved areas might necessitate further clarification to avoid favoritism or unequal opportunities across different demographics.
Conclusion
While the $1 billion funding authorization reflects a significant and necessary investment in nursing education, the bill could benefit from additional specificity in terms of budget capping, detailed criteria for priority areas, and clearer guidance on the equitable distribution of funds. These considerations are crucial to ensure transparency, fairness, and effective use of taxpayer dollars in strengthening the nursing workforce and education infrastructure.
Issues
The bill allows for up to $1,000,000,000 to be appropriated without specifying any budget caps or limits for individual grants, potentially leading to large, unchecked expenditures. This issue appears in Section 2 and Section 832.
The criteria for prioritizing grant recipients, such as the definition of 'medically underserved area' and 'health professional shortage area,' are not described in the text, potentially requiring additional documents for clarification. This issue relates to Section 2.
The broad discretionary power given to the Secretary for determining activities under the grant use presents potential for ambiguous decision-making, as seen in Section 832(d)(8).
The lack of clear timelines and requirements for the reporting process may lead to inconsistencies in accountability and evaluation of grant use, mentioned in Section 2 and Section 832.
The allocation of grants may favor certain geographical or demographic groups disproportionately, needing further justification or clarity. This issue is detailed in Section 832(b).
There is no specified procedure for resolving potential conflicts of interest in grant distribution or partnerships, which could pose ethical concerns, as noted in Section 832.
The term 'equitable distribution of awards among the geographic regions of the United States' is subjective, potentially leading to disputes over fairness in grant allocation. This issue is in Section 832(c).
The amendment striking the word 'Basic' lacks context and may lead to ambiguity about the implications of this legislative change, as mentioned in Section 3.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section gives the official short title of the legislation, which is the "Future Advancement of Academic Nursing Act" or "FAAN Act."
2. Support for nursing education and the future nursing workforce Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the Public Health Service Act aims to provide grants to nursing schools, especially those in underserved areas, to tackle nursing shortages by increasing faculty and student numbers, modernizing education, and enhancing their readiness for public health emergencies. Priority will be given to schools in underserved, rural, or shortage areas, and funds can be used for various purposes, including infrastructure modernization and student enrollment support, with schools required to report on their activities annually.
Money References
- “(g) Authorization of appropriations.—To carry out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000,000 to remain available until expended.”.
832. Nursing education enhancement and modernization grants in underserved areas Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed section authorizes grants to nursing schools, especially in underserved, rural, or health professional shortage areas, to increase faculty and student numbers, enhance nursing education programs, and improve infrastructure. The grants aim to address nursing workforce shortages and enhance preparedness for public health emergencies, with $1 billion authorized for these efforts. Schools are required to report on how they use the funds, and the Secretary must report to Congress on the grants' outcomes within five years.
Money References
- Such report shall include— (1) a list of schools of nursing receiving grants under this section, including the primary geographic location of any school of nursing that was improved or expanded through such a grant; (2) the total number of students who are enrolled at or who have graduated from any school of nursing that was improved or expanded through a grant under this section, which such statistic shall— (A) to the extent such information is available, be deidentified and disaggregated by race, ethnicity, age, sex, geographic region, disability status, and other relevant factors; and (B) include an indication of the number of such students who are from racial or ethnic groups underrepresented in the nursing workforce, such students who are from rural or underserved areas, such students who are low-income students, and such students who are first generation college students (as defined in section 402A(h)(3) of the Higher Education Act of 1965); (3) to the extent such information is available— (A) the effects of the grants awarded under this section on— (i) retaining and hiring of faculty, including any increase in diverse faculty; (ii) the number of clinical education partnerships; and (iii) the modernization of nursing education infrastructure; and (B) other ways this section helps to address nursing workforce shortages and quickly respond to public health emergencies declared under section 319 and pandemics that are not otherwise declared as such emergencies; (4) recommendations for improving the grants awarded under this section; and (5) any other considerations as the Secretary determines appropriate. (g) Authorization of appropriations.—To carry out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000,000 to remain available until expended. ---
3. Strengthening nurse education Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section changes the heading of a specific part of the Public Health Service Act by removing the word "Basic" from it, as part of an effort to strengthen nurse education.