Overview
Title
To amend the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010 to make improvements to that Act, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 726 is a plan to make things better for the Crow Tribe by helping them manage their water more easily and giving them money to fix or build new water projects. It also makes sure they take care of these projects themselves, like when a kid is responsible for their toy.
Summary AI
H.R. 726, titled the “Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025,” proposes changes to the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010. The bill aims to improve the management and funding of water-related projects by the Crow Tribe. It establishes new accounts to fund water infrastructure projects and repeals outdated provisions of the earlier act. Additionally, the bill ensures that the Tribe retains ownership and responsibility for maintaining any projects built using these funds.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025" is a legislative effort to revise and improve the original Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010. This amendment primarily focuses on updating definitions, reorganizing financial sections, and establishing new funding accounts to better manage water-related projects for the Crow Tribe. Key changes include the replacement of the term "MR&I System" with "Projects," the establishment of new accounts to allocate resources more effectively, and the introduction of cost adjustments based on economic indices.
Summary of Significant Issues
One major issue within the amendment is the repeal of Section 406, which could disrupt ongoing projects or misallocate funds previously designated for certain obligations. The modification of funds management, particularly within the new Crow CIP Implementation Account, lacks clear oversight and accountability measures, which could lead to financial misuse. Furthermore, the frequent amendments and redesignations of sections may create confusion in legal and administrative applications. Allowing funds for land purchases without stringent guidelines might also lead to broad interpretations and misuse. Lastly, the amendment's approach to adjusting project costs retroactively from 2008 may not accurately reflect current economic trends.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this amendment attempts to offer a more structured and efficient way of managing water rights settlements and associated projects for the Crow Tribe. By doing so, it could potentially ensure that water resources are allocated fairly and sustainably. However, without clear accountability and oversight mechanisms, there is a risk of mismanagement of funds, leading to inefficient usage of taxpayer money and resources. The general public may not directly feel the effects of this bill unless they are stakeholders in water rights issues or environmental management.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the Crow Tribe, these amendments could present a mixed bag. On the positive side, the new funding structures might provide more predictable financial support for water-related infrastructure projects, giving the Tribe control over the planning and execution of these projects. On the downside, the responsibility for operation and maintenance exclusively falls on the Tribe, potentially imposing a financial burden if sufficient resources are not managed well due to inadequate oversight.
Legal and administrative professionals tasked with enforcing the new provisions may struggle with the bill's frequent alterations and lack of cross-referencing in section changes, which could impede effective implementation. Furthermore, without proper guidelines, funds may not reach their intended purposes, impacting community members relying on improvements in water infrastructure and management.
Overall, while the bill seeks to enhance the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act, its effectiveness largely hinges on the clarity of its provisions and the establishment of rigorous oversight and accountability frameworks.
Issues
The repeal of Section 406 as indicated in Section 2(b) could have significant legal and financial consequences if it's tied to ongoing work or funding. This change risks interrupting current projects or misallocating funds without proper transfer or nullification of responsibilities.
The lack of oversight or accountability measures for the management and distribution of funds in the Crow CIP Implementation Account as described in Section 412(a) presents significant risks of misuse or lack of transparency in financial dealings.
Frequent amendments and redesignations, such as the redesignation of sections 412 through 416 as 413 through 417, outlined in Section 2(d)(1), may result in misreference errors and could complicate the legal implementation and enforcement of the Act.
The amendment allowing the remaining funds in the MR&I Projects Account, as per Section 411(c)(4)(ii), to be used for land purchases may require more specific limitations or guidelines to prevent broad interpretation and possible financial misuse.
The retroactive indexing adjustment to May 1, 2008, for costs related to the MR&I Projects Account, as described in Section 2(f)(3), might not align with recent cost trends and may lead to inaccuracies in future financial planning.
The stated federal non-obligation for MR&I Project operation, maintenance, or replacement costs as per Section 411(j) could place a significant financial burden on the Tribe and necessitates the establishment of clear fiscal responsibility and accountability mechanisms.
The absence of criteria for the use of funds in the Crow CIP Implementation Account to carry out Section 405, as discussed in Section 412(c), leaves room for broad and potentially inappropriate use of funds.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section titled "1. Short title" states that this law can be referred to as the “Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025.”
2. Crow Tribe water rights settlement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010 update definitions, eliminate the MR&I System, and manage funds with the Secretary overseeing investments and distributions. New accounts, like the Crow CIP Implementation Account, are established to support specific water-related projects, ensuring the Tribe retains control over infrastructure and the Federal Government isn't responsible for maintenance costs. Additionally, changes account for cost fluctuations, and several technical and clerical amendments are made throughout the document for consistency.
412. Crow CIP Implementation Account Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Crow CIP Implementation Account is a special interest-bearing account established by the Secretary to help manage and distribute funds made available by certain provisions of the Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025. The funds, along with any investment earnings, will be used specifically to carry out section 405 of the act.