Overview
Title
To amend section 3706 of title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the submission of cost and pricing data after agreeing on the contract price as a defense to contract price adjustments for defective cost and pricing data, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to make sure that if a company working with the military gives the wrong money information after agreeing on a price, they can't use that as an excuse to avoid fixing any issues with the price.
Summary AI
H.R. 7253, titled the “Best Price for Our Military Act of 2024,” proposes changes to section 3706 of title 10, United States Code. The bill seeks to delete the allowance of using late submission of cost and pricing data, after agreeing on a contract price, as a defense against adjustments for defective pricing data. This means contractors would no longer be able to avoid price adjustments based on claims of submitting cost data after contract pricing was agreed upon.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill in question, "H.R. 7253," is proposed to amend section 3706 of title 10, United States Code. The focus of this legislation is on adjusting rules related to the submission of cost and pricing data in government contracts. Specifically, it seeks to eliminate a defense used by contractors who submit cost and pricing data after the contract price has been agreed upon, especially regarding adjustments for defective data. By removing this defense, it aims to ensure that contractors are held accountable for any inaccuracies or defects in the data provided after the pricing agreement is reached.
Summary of Significant Issues
There are several issues associated with this bill. First, the legislation does not clearly explain why the defense for late submission of cost and pricing data is being eliminated. Without a clear rationale, stakeholders might be confused about the necessity and benefits of this change. Additionally, the bill involves technical legal language that could be difficult to understand for individuals without legal expertise. This complexity might hinder discussions and informed decisions about the bill. Furthermore, the lack of context regarding the implications for contractors and government agencies could lead to uncertainty and misinterpretation of how this amendment might affect current and future contracts.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill might seem to promote transparency and accountability in government contracting, which could lead to better use of taxpayer money. By making it more difficult for contractors to defend against price adjustments due to late or defective data submissions, the bill could ensure that contractors provide accurate and timely information. However, the public might also be concerned about potential delays or disruptions in military procurement processes if contractors are hesitant or unable to comply efficiently with these new requirements.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The bill's impact on specific stakeholders, such as contractors and government agencies, could be both positive and negative. On the positive side, the amendment could lead to more precise contract pricing and potentially reduce costs for government agencies by ensuring contractors are more diligent in their data submissions. However, contractors might view this elimination of defenses as burdensome, possibly leading to increased administrative costs and efforts to ensure compliance with stricter guidelines. This, in turn, could affect their willingness to engage in government contracts or lead to higher initial costs being passed to the government to cover these risks. Additionally, without clear guidance or justification, government agencies might face challenges in implementing these changes and managing potential disputes that arise from them.
Overall, the bill aims to enhance the integrity of financial data in defense contracts, but clarity and context would be beneficial to ensure comprehensive understanding and smooth adaptation for all involved parties.
Issues
The bill proposes eliminating the defense related to the submission of cost and pricing data after agreeing on the contract price, but it does not provide an explanation for this change. This lack of justification might lead to confusion and resistance from stakeholders who rely on this defense, as well as uncertainty regarding the intended benefits of this amendment. (Section 2)
The amendment involves technical modifications to legal language in the United States Code, which may not be immediately clear to those without legal or contracting expertise. The complex legal language can hinder understanding and informed discussion among the general public and less specialized stakeholders. (Section 2)
The amendment modifies a specific section of the United States Code without providing broader context or implications for contractors or government agencies that may be impacted by these changes. This lack of context could lead to misunderstandings about the amendment's impact on current and future contracts. (Section 2)
The use of semicolons and specific legal language, although standard in legal documents, could be simplified or accompanied by explanatory materials to enhance understanding by a general audience. Clearer language would facilitate better engagement and transparency about the bill's intentions and effects. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill establishes its short title, which is “Best Price for Our Military Act of 2024.”
2. Elimination of late cost and pricing data submission defense Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 3706(c) of title 10, United States Code, is being amended to include a new provision that removes the defense for submitting cost or pricing data late if it is done by the prime contractor or subcontractor after agreeing on the contract's price.