Overview

Title

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to enhance the penalties applicable with respect to certain violations involving the use of interactive computer service to distribute a controlled substance, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 7239 is a bill that wants to make it much more serious trouble for people who use the internet, like social media, to sell drugs. If someone gets caught, they could go to jail for a long time, but they won't get as much punishment if they were just selling a tiny bit of marijuana.

Summary AI

H.R. 7239, titled the "Drug-Free Social Media and Digital Communities Act of 2024," aims to amend the Controlled Substances Act by increasing penalties for distributing controlled substances through social media platforms. Specifically, the bill proposes doubling the maximum prison term, supervised release, and fines for those found guilty of such offenses. For repeat offenders, the penalties can be tripled, with a mandatory minimum prison sentence of at least three years. However, this minimum sentence does not apply to cases involving small amounts of marijuana.

Published

2024-02-05
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-02-05
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7239ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
812
Pages:
4
Sentences:
14

Language

Nouns: 222
Verbs: 62
Adjectives: 52
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 38
Entities: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.29
Average Sentence Length:
58.00
Token Entropy:
4.90
Readability (ARI):
31.26

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 7239, also known as the "Drug-Free Social Media and Digital Communities Act of 2024," seeks to amend the Controlled Substances Act by imposing stricter penalties for the distribution of controlled substances through interactive computer services, such as social media platforms. The bill proposes increasing imprisonment terms, fines, and periods of supervised release for offenders who utilize digital platforms to distribute these substances. The bill distinguishes penalties for first-time offenders and repeat offenders, prescribing harsher sentences for the latter.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several concerns arise from the drafting of this bill. Firstly, the definition of "interactive computer service" is broad, potentially encompassing a wide spectrum of digital services not traditionally considered social media, thereby affecting platforms and individuals unexpectedly. Secondly, the bill suggests harsh penalties, such as doubling or tripling maximum imprisonment terms, which may lead to excessively severe sentences. Also, the law does not anticipate future technological advancements, raising the risk of it becoming obsolete or misapplied to new digital environments.

Another issue is the inconsistency regarding the exception for offenses involving small quantities of marijuana. This exception does not align uniformly with the varied state legislations around marijuana, potentially causing confusion and uneven application. Finally, the legislation lacks a mechanism to differentiate between major and minor infractions, which could result in disproportionate penalties, thereby raising fairness concerns in its application.

Impact on the Public Broadly

If enacted, this bill could significantly increase legal consequences for individuals using digital platforms to distribute controlled substances, which may deter such activities. However, the broad application of terms may inadvertently affect individuals engaged in relatively minor infractions, potentially leading to public discontent regarding justice and fairness in sentencing. The legislation's rigid structure could result in a high social and economic cost, by increasing the number of individuals serving lengthy prison sentences, thereby impacting families and community structures.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The legislation may have varied impacts on specific stakeholders:

  • Law Enforcement: The bill could empower law enforcement agencies with stricter tools to combat drug distribution online, potentially leading to more arrests and prosecutions. However, it also demands more resources and training to handle emerging digital platforms effectively.

  • Technology Companies: The broad definition of "interactive computer service" could place significant legal and operational burdens on tech companies, especially if they are held accountable for the activities conducted through their platforms. This could lead to increased monitoring and surveillance efforts, affecting user privacy.

  • Legal System: The judicial system might face challenges regarding fair sentencing and differentiating between levels of offense severity, potentially leading to an overwhelming increase in cases requiring nuanced interpretation.

  • Individuals: People using digital platforms might become unintended targets if engaged in minor offenses, with legal consequences that might not proportionately reflect the gravity of their actions.

In summary, while the proposed legislation aims to address the serious issue of drug distribution via digital platforms, it raises several concerns about fairness, proportionality, and the potential for significant unintended consequences affecting various sectors of society.

Issues

  • The definition of 'interactive computer service' in Section 2 is overly broad, potentially encompassing a wide range of services beyond those intended, which could affect numerous digital platforms unexpectedly.

  • The penalties described in Section 2, such as 'twice the maximum term of imprisonment' or 'three times the maximum term of imprisonment,' could lead to disproportionately severe sentences for offenses committed using interactive computer services.

  • The bill in Section 2 does not account for future technological changes and emerging digital platforms, leaving the law potentially outdated or misapplied.

  • The inconsistency created by the exception for '5 grams or less of marihuana' in Section 2 might lead to confusion or uneven application of the law, especially given the varying marihuana legislation across states.

  • In Section 2, the lack of clear distinction between major and minor infractions could lead to inappropriate or unjust penalties, raising concerns about fairness in sentencing.

  • Section 424 imposes significantly enhanced penalties for using interactive computer services to distribute controlled substances, which may not proportionately address the varying degrees of involvement in such offenses.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states its short title, which can be cited as the “Drug-Free Social Media and Digital Communities Act of 2024”.

2. Prohibition on use of interactive computer service to distribute a controlled substance Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Controlled Substances Act to impose stricter penalties on individuals who use interactive computer services, such as social media, to distribute controlled substances. It sets out increased imprisonment terms, fines, and supervised release periods for first-time and repeat offenders, while also defining what constitutes an "interactive computer service."

424. Distribution through use of social media Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section details the penalties for distributing controlled substances using social media or internet services. It specifies increased prison terms, fines, and supervised release for offenses, including minimum sentencing guidelines, with harsher penalties for repeat offenders.