Overview
Title
To prohibit Federal support for institutions of higher education that promote antisemitism, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7231 is a rule that says if colleges or universities do things that are mean to Jewish people, they might lose money from the government unless they promise to stop being mean.
Summary AI
H.R. 7231 seeks to cut off federal support for colleges and universities that promote antisemitism. This legislation defines antisemitism as any hatred toward Jews and includes actions against Jews, their property, and religious facilities. The Secretary of Education is tasked with determining if an institution has engaged in antisemitic activities. If found guilty, these institutions are given an opportunity to rectify the behavior, failing which they risk losing federal funding until the issue is satisfactorily resolved.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Combating Anti-Semitic Messaging and Promoting Unity in School Act" or the "CAMPUS Act," seeks to address antisemitism in institutions of higher education in the United States. Introduced in the House of Representatives, the bill aims to prohibit federal support, including funds, to colleges and universities found to promote or engage in antisemitic activities. Under the bill, the Secretary of Education holds the responsibility to determine whether an institution has engaged in such activities and to enforce penalties. Institutions identified as offenders have a 30-day window to rectify the situation, which includes ceasing the activities and disciplining responsible personnel.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill raises several significant issues:
Ambiguity in Interpretation: The definitions of "antisemitic harassment" and "promotion of antisemitism" are central to the bill. However, these terms can be subject to broad interpretations, potentially leading to ambiguities in enforcement. This vagueness could result in inconsistent application or legal challenges against the determinations made by the Secretary of Education.
Subjectivity in Enforcement: The bill grants substantial discretion to the Secretary of Education, highlighting concerns about the potential for biased or uneven enforcement of penalties. Without clear criteria or external checks, determinations may become subjective and politically influenced.
Brief Correction Period: Institutions are given only 30 days to take corrective actions, a timeframe that might be insufficient for thorough investigations and the implementation of comprehensive measures. This could result in institutions being unfairly penalized.
Compliance Uncertainty: The requirement that institutions must demonstrate corrective actions "to the satisfaction of the Secretary" lacks defined standards, possibly leading to compliance issues and further legal disputes.
Impact on the Public
The bill, if enacted, would likely have broad implications for higher education institutions across the country. By linking federal funding to adherence to specific standards regarding antisemitic activities, the legislation aims to foster inclusivity and combat hate-based rhetoric. However, the potentially ambiguous standards and subjective enforcement mechanisms may lead to complications.
Impact on Stakeholders
Institutions of Higher Education: Colleges and universities may face challenges in interpreting compliance requirements given the vague definitions within the bill. Institutions might experience disruptions due to the short timeframe allowed to respond to allegations of antisemitism.
Student and Faculty Communities: For students and faculty, particularly those involved in discussions or activities related to politically sensitive topics, there is the risk of being indirectly affected by the bill's enforcement. Faculty members may feel constrained in academic freedom, leading to self-censorship to avoid accusations of promoting antisemitism.
Advocacy and Legal Groups: Organizations advocating for free speech or against antisemitism may take a keen interest in the bill, potentially leading to litigation or activism to address perceived issues in the bill's implementation or impact.
Overall, while the bill's intent to counter antisemitism in education reflects important societal goals, its practical application could present significant challenges for a range of stakeholders, potentially sparking debate and necessitating further legal scrutiny.
Issues
The broad interpretation of 'antisemitic harassment' and 'promotion of antisemitism' in Section 2 could lead to ambiguity in enforcement, raising legal concerns about consistent application and potential challenges.
The subjective definition of 'antisemitism' in Section 2 might lead to varied interpretations, impacting legal clarity and leading to potential disputes and challenges in court.
The enforcement mechanism in Section 2 grants significant power to the Secretary of Education without adequate checks, risking inconsistency or bias in the application of penalties, which raises political and ethical concerns.
The requirement for institutions to 'demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary' that corrective actions were taken as stated in Section 2 is subjective and may not have clear criteria, leading to issues in compliance and legal disputes.
The 30-day period for institutions to cure prohibited activities as outlined in Section 2 may be insufficient for comprehensive investigation and corrective measures, potentially resulting in unfair penalization of institutions.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act provides its short title, stating that it can be called the “Combating Anti-Semitic Messaging and Promoting Unity in School Act” or simply the "CAMPUS Act."
2. Prohibition on Federal support for institutions of higher education that promote antisemitism Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
An institution of higher education cannot receive federal funds if it engages in activities that promote antisemitism. If found guilty, the Secretary of Education will notify the institution and require corrective action within 30 days, after which penalties will be enforced unless compliance is demonstrated.