Overview
Title
An Act To amend title 5, United States Code, to require greater transparency for Federal regulatory decisions that impact small businesses, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Prove It Act of 2024 is a new rule that helps small businesses by making sure they know about changes to rules that might affect them, letting them ask for help if they think a rule is bad for them, and warning big rule makers to explain what they're doing and let people say what they think.
Summary AI
The Prove It Act of 2024 aims to enhance transparency in federal regulations impacting small businesses by amending title 5 of the United States Code. It introduces specific procedures for reviewing rules to ensure they don't unduly burden small enterprises. This includes allowing small businesses to petition the Small Business Administration for a review if a proposed rule might significantly affect them economically. Agencies are required to publish all guidance documents and allow for public comment, with penalties for non-compliance, making it easier for small entities to understand and influence regulatory decisions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Prove It Act of 2024," aims to amend Title 5 of the United States Code to enhance transparency in federal regulatory decisions impacting small businesses. The bill outlines procedures for evaluating the economic impacts of proposed regulations on small entities and provides mechanisms for small businesses to challenge these assessments. This includes petitioning for reviews of regulatory certifications that assert minimal economic impact. It also imposes requirements for publishing guidance related to regulations and details the procedures for periodic review of existing rules.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from the bill's provisions. Firstly, the requirement for both initial and final regulatory flexibility analyses could lead to increased administrative costs and possibly redundant efforts, affecting both government agencies and small businesses. Additionally, the lack of clear definitions for critical terms like "significant economic impact" and "substantial number of small entities" may lead to inconsistent application by agencies.
Another concern is the possibility for judicial review based on the determinations of the Chief Counsel for Advocacy, which could result in increased litigation and delays in implementing rules. The complexity of the process for small businesses to petition for review might hinder participation from those without legal expertise. Furthermore, the bill lacks enforcement mechanisms and specific deadlines for publication of guidance documents, which could reduce accountability and effectiveness.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill may have mixed impacts on the public. By aiming for greater regulatory transparency, it seeks to provide small businesses with a clearer understanding of how regulations affect them, potentially fostering a more supportive regulatory environment. However, the administrative burden and potential increase in litigation may slow down the implementation of necessary regulatory measures, indirectly affecting industries and consumers awaiting updated rules.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For small businesses, the bill offers a mechanism to voice their concerns over potentially harmful regulations, allowing them to challenge regulatory assessments that they believe could negatively impact them. Such provisions could empower these entities to better navigate federal regulations. However, complexity in the petition procedures may disadvantage businesses lacking legal resources.
For federal agencies, the requirements to conduct multiple analyses and review procedures could strain resources, necessitating additional administrative efforts and potentially leading to delays in policy implementation. Agencies might also face challenges in consistently applying vague criteria such as what constitutes a "significant economic impact."
For the legal system, the increased potential for judicial review could result in an uptick in cases, thereby adding to the workload of the courts. This may contribute to slower resolution of cases, affecting parties seeking timely regulatory guidance or relief.
In conclusion, while the "Prove It Act of 2024" seeks to enhance transparency and provide small businesses with a voice in the regulatory process, its implementation could encounter several practical challenges, both in terms of administration and interpretation, which may impact its effectiveness in achieving intended goals.
Issues
The requirement for agencies to perform both initial and final regulatory flexibility analyses could lead to increased administrative costs and potentially redundant efforts, impacting both government and small business resources. This issue is mentioned in Section 2.
The lack of clear definitions for what constitutes a 'significant economic impact' or a 'substantial number of small entities' can lead to inconsistent interpretations, which could affect how agencies and small businesses engage with the regulatory process. This issue is present in Sections 2, 605A, and 3.
The possibility of judicial review as a final agency action based on the Chief Counsel's determinations could increase litigation and burden the judicial system, potentially causing delays in rule implementation. This issue is noted in Section 605A.
The amendment requiring agencies to review rules every 10 years lacks specificity in defining compliance and does not address potential enforcement mechanisms if agencies fail to adhere to these new requirements. This could impact longevity and effectiveness of regulations. This issue is highlighted in Section 4.
The process for small entities to petition the Chief Counsel is complex and may be difficult for businesses without legal expertise to navigate, potentially impeding participation from smaller businesses. This issue is found in Section 605A.
There is no specified timeline for when guidance documents must be published, potentially leading to delays in regulatory transparency and compliance by agencies. This issue is identified in Section 3.
The lack of enforcement mechanisms or consequences for agencies if they fail to comply with requirements like publishing necessary documents or allowing feedback could minimize the effectiveness of the bill. This issue is noted in Section 3.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act states its official short title, which is the “Prove It Act of 2024.”
2. Initial regulatory flexibility analysis Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines amendments to how small businesses can challenge the impact of proposed regulations on them, allowing them to petition for a review if they believe a new rule will significantly affect them. It sets procedures for determining whether these petitions should proceed, including consultation opportunities and a full review process, and establishes consequences for agencies that do not cooperate.
605A. Review procedures relating to initial regulatory flexibility analysis certifications Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Any small business or group can ask the Small Business Administration to review whether a new rule will negatively impact them. If the initial review finds potential harm, the Administration will meet with involved parties and decide if a deeper assessment is necessary. If an agency doesn't help with this review, the rule won't apply to small businesses.
3. Publication of guidance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The new amendment to Section 609 of title 5 of the United States Code requires that any government rule expected to significantly affect many small businesses must be accompanied by published guidance documents on a website like regulations.gov. Additionally, it mandates providing an opportunity for public comments to help small businesses give feedback on these documents.
4. Review procedures for section 610 periodic review of rules Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes changes to the procedures for reviewing federal rules, including considering indirect costs over a 10-year period and actions to be taken if a review is not conducted on time. It outlines steps for reinstating a rule if an agency fails to review it within the given timeframe, requiring public notification and comment, and providing the agency with 180 days to complete the review once it decides to reinstate the rule.