Overview
Title
To amend title 23, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Transportation to require States to set aside certain funds to carry out highway safety improvement projects to reduce the number of injuries and fatalities at high-risk pedestrian crossings.
ELI5 AI
In this bill, the government wants to use some special money to make pedestrian crossings safer, so people don't get hurt or killed. States will have to spend part of their road and highway funds on fixing the most dangerous crossings, but there are no exact rules on how to do this.
Summary AI
H. R. 7191, also known as the "Save Our Pedestrians Act of 2024," proposes changes to title 23 of the United States Code. It directs the Secretary of Transportation to mandate that states allocate 5% of certain transportation funds for projects aimed at improving safety at pedestrian crossings deemed high-risk due to frequent injuries or fatalities. The bill highlights the importance of reducing accidents between pedestrians and vehicles at these identified crossings.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, H.R. 7191, titled the “Save Our Pedestrians Act of 2024,” aims to amend title 23 of the United States Code to enhance pedestrian safety. Specifically, it directs the Secretary of Transportation to require each state to allocate 5% of its road improvement funding to projects that address safety at high-risk pedestrian crossings. These are locations identified as having frequent pedestrian injuries or fatalities due to vehicle interactions. The bill seeks to curb these incidents by mandating focused investment in high-risk areas.
Summary of Significant Issues
One critical issue with the bill is the lack of specific guidelines for designating funds effectively towards these safety projects. Without clear criteria, there is a risk of ineffective or inefficient use of taxpayer money. The bill places the responsibility on states, in partnership with local governments, to identify what qualifies as a "high-risk pedestrian crossing.” This could lead to inconsistent practices across different regions, as the bill does not establish standardized measures to define or prioritize these high-risk areas.
Furthermore, the bill does not contain explicit accountability mechanisms. There are no defined metrics or standards for evaluating whether the allocated funds have successfully reduced pedestrian injuries and fatalities. This absence of a structured oversight framework can raise concerns about transparency and the effectiveness of resource allocation.
Additionally, the bill does not address the potential for overlapping efforts with other state or federal initiatives aiming to improve pedestrian safety. This could result in duplicative work, drawing away resources that might be more effectively used in coordinated efforts.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill has the potential to enhance public safety by addressing dangerous pedestrian crossings, potentially lowering the number of accidents and fatalities involving pedestrians. If implemented effectively, these targeted improvements could create safer environments for pedestrians in high-risk zones, fostering greater confidence in pedestrian infrastructure safety.
However, the loose criteria and lack of a standardized implementation plan may lead to an uneven impact across the country. Some communities might not see improvements if their needs are not addressed due to inconsistent application of funds.
Impact on Stakeholders
The primary positive impact would be felt by pedestrians, particularly those in identified high-risk areas, who could benefit from safer crosswalks and intersections. State and local governments might also gain from having earmarked funds to tackle pressing safety issues, providing them a degree of fiscal relief from the burden of sourcing these improvements from their own budgets.
Conversely, potential negative impacts could arise for taxpayers if funds are not used efficiently, resulting in wasted public resources. There is also the possibility of discord among stakeholders if the identification of high-risk areas is perceived as biased or unjust, possibly privileging certain communities over others without objective justification.
In conclusion, while the bill intends to improve pedestrian safety infrastructure, the absence of specific guidelines and accountability measures could affect its efficacy and equity, impacting various stakeholders in different ways. It highlights the need for a more comprehensive framework within which to operate, ensuring that all high-risk pedestrian crossings receive the attention and resources necessary for real safety improvements.
Issues
The provision in Section 2 mandates that 5 percent of highway safety improvement funds be used for high-risk pedestrian crossings without clear criteria for effective use of these funds. This lack of specificity can lead to inefficient or wasteful spending of taxpayer dollars.
Section 2 relies on states, in consultation with local governments, to identify 'high-risk pedestrian crossings' without standardized criteria, which may lead to inconsistent application and potentially unjust or biased decision-making favoring certain areas or communities.
There is no explicit mechanism for accountability or assessment in Section 2 to ensure funds are effectively reducing injuries and fatalities, which raises concerns about the potential for unmeasured or ineffective use of funds.
The lack of guidelines or metrics in Section 2 for defining or measuring high-risk crossings poses a risk of subjective decisions that may not be equitably distributed or justified, which could lead to disputes or favoritism accusations.
Section 2 does not address potential overlap with other state or federal initiatives targeting pedestrian safety, leading to possible duplication of efforts and inefficient use of resources.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill states that its official name is the "Save Our Pedestrians Act of 2024."
2. Set-aside for high-risk pedestrian crossings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Of the federal funds given to each state for improving roads, 5% must be used to make high-risk pedestrian crossings safer. A high-risk pedestrian crossing is defined as a place on the highway where many accidents between vehicles and pedestrians happen, as identified by the state and local governments.