Overview
Title
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require the President to set a minimum annual goal for the number of refugees to be admitted, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The GRACE Act says the President has to let at least 125,000 people who need a new home (called refugees) come live in America each year and tell Congress how that's going, but it also needs to be really clear and fair about how it does this.
Summary AI
H.R. 7173, known as the “Guaranteed Refugee Admission Ceiling Enhancement Act” or “GRACE Act,” proposes amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act requiring the President to set a minimum annual goal of admitting no fewer than 125,000 refugees into the United States. If the President does not set this goal before the fiscal year begins, the default number will be 125,000. The bill also mandates quarterly reports to Congress on refugee admissions, including detailed statistics and projections to ensure these goals are met. Furthermore, it addresses various aspects of refugee processing, such as regional allocations and the timely admission of refugees, without impeding the processing of other immigration applications.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Guaranteed Refugee Admission Ceiling Enhancement Act" or the "GRACE Act," seeks to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to establish a minimum target for refugee admissions to the United States each year. Specifically, the bill mandates that at least 125,000 refugees be admitted annually, with the President tasked with determining the precise number based on humanitarian needs and national interests. Additionally, it requires the submission of quarterly reports to Congress detailing various metrics related to refugee admissions, including regional allocations and other processing aspects.
Summary of Significant Issues
One major issue highlighted in this bill is the absence of a clearly defined methodology for determining the set admission number, leaving the decision largely at the President's discretion. While this approach could offer flexibility, it also introduces potential ambiguity and may lack transparency in implementing these decisions.
Another significant concern is the extensive reporting requirements for refugee admissions, which may demand substantial administrative resources. This could be burdensome and inefficient if not managed carefully, potentially resulting in wasted resources.
In addition, the language around numerical goals and regional allocations lacks specificity, which could lead to misinterpretations or inconsistencies in applying refugee admission processes. This bill's provision for an "unallocated reserve" with ambiguous guidelines could further complicate resource management for refugee resettlements.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill could impact the public by potentially increasing the number of refugees settling in the country. This might bring diverse benefits to communities, such as cultural enrichment and economic contributions through new labor forces. However, it might also raise challenges related to resource allocation, community integration, and the local capacity to support newcomers.
The extensive reporting and transparency requirements aim to ensure accountability and oversight, which could bolster public trust in the immigration system if executed effectively. However, if these are seen as overly bureaucratic, they could strain government resources, affecting the efficiency of the refugee admissions process.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For refugees and advocacy groups, this bill represents a positive step toward increasing protection and safe resettlement opportunities. By establishing a minimum admission target, it offers a more predictable and potentially responsive environment to address global humanitarian needs.
On the other hand, federal agencies involved in implementing these policies may experience increased pressure due to the administrative demands of quarterly reporting and the logistical challenges involved in meeting set quotas. They must navigate increased workloads within potentially limited resource frameworks.
State and local communities receiving refugees might face initial challenges in ensuring sufficient infrastructure and support systems are available to integrate new residents effectively. Still, over time, these communities may benefit from cultural and economic contributions brought by refugees.
In conclusion, while the GRACE Act aspires to enhance the United States' role in addressing international refugee crises, its success depends on balancing flexibility and accountability, ensuring transparent and efficient processes, and robust support systems for both arrivals and host communities.
Issues
The requirement for a minimum of 125,000 refugees to be admitted annually (Section 2(a)(1)(B) and 2(a)(2)) does not include a detailed methodology for how this number is determined. Leaving it to the President's discretion could lead to ambiguity and a lack of clarity, raising concerns about the consistent and transparent implementation of refugee admissions.
The extensive quarterly reporting requirement to Congress (Section 2(g)) might require significant administrative resources. This could be burdensome and potentially wasteful if not managed efficiently, raising concerns about government efficiency and resource allocation.
The language in Section 2(a)(3) regarding 'numerical goals' and how federal officers should treat refugee admissions goals could be subject to misinterpretation, potentially leading to application inconsistencies in federal refugee admissions processes.
The lack of explicit guidelines for determining the unallocated reserve in regional allocations (Section 2(a)(6)(B)) could lead to uncertainty or misallocation of resources, possibly undermining efficient and fair management of refugee resettlement.
The provision for regional allocations to include an unallocated reserve (Section 2(a)(6)(B)) could result in inefficient management of refugee resources if not clearly defined and monitored, impacting the fair distribution of resettlement resources.
The 'Rule of construction' in Section 2(h) might grant excessive leeway to federal agencies without specific guidelines, potentially leading to inconsistent applications and interpretations that could affect the fairness and speed of processing refugee and asylum applications.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that this law is called the “Guaranteed Refugee Admission Ceiling Enhancement Act” or the “GRACE Act.”
2. Admission of refugees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to set a minimum of 125,000 refugees that can be admitted each fiscal year, with the President having the authority to determine the exact number based on humanitarian concerns. It also requires the President to submit detailed quarterly reports to Congress on refugee admissions and includes guidelines for processing, regional allocations, and plans to meet refugee admission goals.