Overview
Title
To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 to establish the Climate Scientific Research Advisory Committee and the Rural Climate Alliance Network, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7163 is a plan to help farmers deal with climate change by creating a special group to guide research and a network to support rural communities, but it might have some problems with how well it works and who gets to be involved.
Summary AI
H.R. 7163 seeks to update the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 by setting up a new committee and network. The bill proposes creating the Climate Scientific Research Advisory Committee to guide agriculture climate research policy, and the Rural Climate Alliance Network to support rural communities and farmers with science-based strategies for dealing with climate change. These initiatives aim to improve coordination in agricultural research and data-sharing to better adapt to and mitigate climate change effects on agriculture.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Improving Coordination of Agriculture Research and Data Act," aims to modify the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977. The bill seeks to create the Climate Scientific Research Advisory Committee and Rural Climate Alliance Network. Its primary objectives are to strategically align agricultural climate research and data, enhance technical support, and develop a national research agenda focused on mitigating and adapting to climate change in agriculture. The proposed structures are designed to bolster coordination and dissemination of climate-specific scientific knowledge, potentially improving the resilience and adaptability of the agricultural sector to climate change impacts.
Significant Issues
A notable concern surrounding this legislation is the lack of explicit criteria for measuring the success or effectiveness of the Act's aims. Without clearly defined goals or metrics, implementation could become ambiguous, leading to inefficiencies. The bill also proposes an extensive network of committees and a broad scope of entities involved, which could result in potential wasteful spending and redundancy, given the complexity and potential overlaps in responsibilities.
The language regarding the selection of committee members is broad, which could lead to bias or favoritism in appointments. This ambiguity extends to the vague definitions of "qualified nonprofit organizations" and "qualified private businesses," which may dilute the focus and effectiveness of the initiatives. Additionally, the bill's structure appears complex and potentially bureaucratic, which may hinder swift decision-making processes.
Broad Impact on the Public
If implemented effectively, this legislation could bring significant benefits by advancing agricultural practices that are more climate-resilient and adaptive. This can contribute to a more sustainable food supply chain and bolster the economic viability of rural communities dependent on agriculture. On a broader scale, improved support for agricultural climate research may enhance environmental outcomes and contribute to climate action efforts.
However, the potential for inefficiencies and duplication of efforts could result in wasted resources and a lack of actionable results. If not managed carefully, the initiatives could resultantly become burdensome rather than beneficial.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Agricultural Sector: Farmers, ranchers, and other agricultural producers stand to benefit from improved access to research, data, and technological support, which could enhance their ability to mitigate and adapt to climate change impacts effectively. However, if the selection process for network members lacks transparency, key stakeholders might be overlooked or inadequately represented.
Research Community: Academics and researchers may gain from increased collaboration and data sharing opportunities, but the potential overlap in roles among different entities could lead to jurisdictional conflicts and allocation inefficiencies.
Nonprofit and Private Sectors: Organizations and businesses involved in environmental and agricultural innovation could benefit from the collaborative atmosphere; however, without clear standards for qualification, involvement might be skewed towards influential or better-connected entities.
In conclusion, while the bill has the potential to drive significant advancements in agricultural climate resilience and research, its success will largely hinge on clarifying its goals, ensuring fair representation, and streamlining its processes to avoid redundancy and inefficiency.
Issues
The bill lacks clear metrics or criteria for evaluating the success or efficiency of the purposes outlined in Section 2. This could lead to ambiguous interpretations and inefficiencies in implementing the objectives of the bill.
Section 3 raises concerns about potential wasteful spending due to the broad scope and complex structure of the Agriculture Climate Scientific Research Advisory Committee and the Rural Climate Alliance Network. The lack of clear guidelines for coordination and implementation may lead to redundancy and inefficiencies.
The broad and ambiguous language used in Section 1413C, particularly in the selection of members for the Agriculture Climate Scientific Research Advisory Committee, may lead to favoritism, conflicts of interest, and lack of clear task allocation among its members.
The nomination and selection process for committee members outlined in Section 1413C lacks specific criteria, potentially leading to biased selections and limiting the diversity of perspectives represented in the committee.
Section 1419's broad definition of 'agricultural producer' and the vague criteria for 'qualified nonprofit organizations' and 'qualified private businesses' could result in the inclusion of entities not typically considered key stakeholders, thereby diluting the focus and effectiveness of the Rural Climate Alliance Network.
The absence of specific accountability or performance measurement parameters for the Committee in Section 1413C and the Network in Section 1419 makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of these initiatives, risking them becoming formalities without significant impact.
The establishment of a new bureaucracy as implied in Section 2, without clear funding or oversight details, raises concerns about the possible creation of redundant institutions and inefficiencies.
The compensation and travel expense provisions in Section 1413C could raise questions about feasibility and fairness, particularly as some committee members may not be compensated while devoting substantial time to the committee's work.
In Section 1419, the overlapping roles and responsibilities among existing climate change and agriculture programs within the Rural Climate Alliance Network may result in jurisdictional conflicts and inefficient resource allocation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act states its official name, “Improving Coordination of Agriculture Research and Data Act."
2. Purposes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the goals of the Act, which are to improve alignment of agriculture-related climate research, enhance technical support and technology sharing, and develop a national research plan to address climate change in agriculture.
3. Agriculture climate research coordination and data Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the establishment of an Agriculture Climate Scientific Research Advisory Committee and a Rural Climate Alliance Network. The Committee advises the Secretary of Agriculture on climate-related agricultural research priorities and policies, while the Network aims to coordinate and improve climate adaptation and mitigation research and data sharing among rural communities and agricultural producers.
1413C. Agriculture Climate Scientific Research Advisory Committee Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Agriculture Climate Scientific Research Advisory Committee is established to advise and make recommendations to the Secretary of Agriculture on policies and priorities for climate-specific agricultural research. Composed of 18 members appointed for terms, it consults various stakeholders, reviews current research, evaluates effectiveness, and makes budget suggestions to support climate initiatives, while members serving in this advisory role receive no compensation.
1419. Rural Climate Alliance Network Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Rural Climate Alliance Network section proposes a network to help rural communities and agricultural producers adapt to climate change by providing research, data, and technical assistance. This network will be composed of various entities, including universities, government departments, and nonprofit organizations, and will support climate solutions, communication, and partnerships across the agricultural sector.