Overview
Title
To direct the Federal Communications Commission to develop a framework and tracking system to monitor the top 100 illegal robocall campaigns and to publish a monthly report on such campaigns, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7112 is a plan that asks the government to watch the top 100 bad robocalls and tell people about them every month, hoping this will help stop these annoying phone calls.
Summary AI
H.R. 7112, also known as the “Stop Scams and Spam Act,” aims to combat illegal robocalls by directing the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to create a system and framework to track the top 100 illegal robocall campaigns. The FCC is required to develop this system within a year of the bill's enactment and must publish monthly reports on these campaigns to the public. The bill defines robocalls and text messages, outlining specific technologies and features to differentiate them from calls and messages requiring human intervention.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Stop Scams and Spam Act," aims to combat illegal robocall campaigns by tasking the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with developing a framework and tracking system. This system is intended to monitor the top 100 illegal robocall campaigns within one year of the Act's enactment. Furthermore, the FCC is required to publish a monthly report on these campaigns to maintain public awareness. The bill defines robocalls broadly, including calls and messages made using automated technology, except where significant human intervention is involved.
Significant Issues
The bill presents multiple points of concern. Firstly, it lacks a clear budget or cost analysis for the proposed framework and tracking system. Without financial transparency, there is a risk of resource mismanagement. Another issue is the ambiguous definition of "robocall," particularly concerning what constitutes "substantial human intervention," which could lead to varying interpretations and potential loopholes.
Moreover, the timeline for developing the system, set at one year, may be overly ambitious given potential technological and administrative obstacles. The requirement for the FCC to produce monthly reports also raises concerns about the added logistical and resource demands, especially if the Commission is not adequately staffed or funded for such tasks. Additionally, the definitions provided might not fully account for evolving technologies in robocall practices, leaving room for sophisticated campaigns to evade regulation.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this Act could lead to a reduction in the nuisance and potential fraud associated with illegal robocalls. By increasing transparency and accountability, people might feel more protected against these unwanted communications. However, if the bill is not well-implemented, or if loopholes are exploited, these benefits might not materialize as expected. The timeline and demand for monthly reports may impede the smooth functioning and effectiveness of this regulation.
Impact on Stakeholders
The primary stakeholders include the FCC, telecommunications companies, and consumers. The FCC would face the task of implementing the framework, which may require additional resources or restructuring to meet the Act’s requirements—a challenge without a specified budget or additional funding. Telecommunication companies might benefit from clearer regulations but could also face increased scrutiny and compliance costs.
Consumers, the intended beneficiaries, might enjoy a decrease in robocall nuisances if the system functions as intended. However, their confidence hinges on the FCC’s effectiveness in overcoming the bill's challenges and closing potential loopholes. Without careful consideration of these issues, the bill might place operational and financial strains on both the FCC and telecom providers, potentially affecting the cost or quality of service for consumers.
Issues
The lack of a specified budget or cost analysis for developing and maintaining the framework and tracking system could lead to financial oversight and potential misuse of resources, impacting the financial transparency and feasibility of the Act. This issue relates to Section 2(a).
The ambiguous definition of 'robocall' regarding 'substantial human intervention' in Section 2(c)(2)(B) may lead to differing interpretations and enforcement challenges, potentially creating a loophole for robocallers to exploit.
The tight timeline for the development and implementation of the tracking system, set at not later than 1 year, may be overly optimistic given potential technological and bureaucratic challenges, impacting the effectiveness and timely execution of the framework mentioned in Section 2(a).
The monthly report requirement in Section 2(b) could place a considerable logistical and resource burden on the Federal Communications Commission without ensuring they are adequately resourced or staffed to handle such demands.
The definitions provided in Section 2(c) do not account for all emerging technologies and methods that might be used in robocall campaigns, potentially leading to loopholes that sophisticated robocallers could exploit.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act establishes its short title, indicating that it can be referred to as the “Stop Scams and Spam Act.”
2. Tracking of top 100 illegal robocall campaigns Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has one year to create a system to track the top 100 illegal robocall campaigns, and must release a public report every month on these campaigns. A robocall is defined as calls or texts sent using automated technology, unless significant human intervention is involved, and these definitions also cover various types of text messages but exclude real-time two-way communications.