Overview
Title
An Act To establish requirements relating to certification of small business concerns owned and controlled by women for certain purposes, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7105 is a bill that says only small businesses owned by women that are officially certified can be counted in government goals for helping these types of businesses. It also asks for regular updates to make sure the plan is working and helps women-owned businesses.
Summary AI
H.R. 7105 aims to create requirements for the certification of small businesses owned and controlled by women. The bill mandates that only women-owned small businesses certified by the Small Business Administration or an approved national certifying entity will count towards federal and agency goals. The bill also requires regular updates to Congress on the implementation of these requirements and the status of certification applications. Additionally, it outlines definitions and compliance provisions related to the certification process.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill, titled the “WOSB Certification and Opportunity Expansion Act,” introduced in the 118th Congress, aims to establish specific criteria and processes for the certification of small business concerns owned and controlled by women. This legislation seeks to modify how the federal government calculates its goals for contracting opportunities offered to women-owned small businesses. Initially, only businesses officially certified would contribute to these goals, excluding those self-certified.
General Summary
This bill proposes a significant restructuring of the certification process for women-owned small business concerns (WOSBs). Under current regulations, a portion of small businesses can self-certify as women-owned for the purpose of government contracting goals. This bill removes self-certified businesses from these calculations, requiring official certification instead. In addition, it compels regular updates on certification progress, pending applications, and the implications of these changes on administrative costs and outreach endeavors. The intent of the legislation is to ensure that businesses counted towards governmental small business goals are thoroughly vetted and officially recognized, promoting fairness and integrity.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several critical issues arise from this legislation. One primary concern is the perceived exclusionary practice of disregarding self-certified businesses, which could be interpreted as discriminatory. While this may not be the intent, it raises questions about inclusivity and fair access to opportunities. There's also the logistical challenge of a potentially delayed implementation due to needed regulations, which may affect businesses awaiting certification. Moreover, there's the potential for confusion among businesses concerning their certification status during this transitional phase. Administrative burdens are another key issue, given the frequent and detailed reporting required from the Small Business Administration. Finally, the absence of authorized appropriations to financially support these changes could impose significant resource constraints on the administering body.
Public Impact
Broadly, the bill could have substantial effects on how small businesses, particularly those owned by women, interact with governmental contracting opportunities. By enforcing stricter certification requirements, the government aims to increase transparency and ensure that only genuinely qualifying businesses benefit from set-aside contracts. While the overhaul seeks to enhance program credibility, it may inadvertently lengthen the timeline for businesses to gain certification, potentially delaying access to federal opportunities.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Women-Owned Small Businesses: These entities form the primary group affected. While certified businesses might gain greater recognition and opportunities, those who are currently self-certified could face significant hurdles. The new certification demands could challenge smaller or newer businesses with limited resources to navigate bureaucratic processes.
Government Agencies: Federal agencies calculating their contracting goals would see changes in how these figures are generated, necessitating adjustments to their strategic planning. The requirement for official certification might lead to more predictable and reliable goal setting.
Small Business Administration: The administration will face considerable operational and financial strain due to the need to enhance its certification processes and meet rigorous reporting demands, all without additional funding authorization.
In conclusion, the “WOSB Certification and Opportunity Expansion Act” aspires to bring much-needed structure and fairness to the federal goal-setting for WOSBs. However, its implementation may result in logistical complications, potential delays, and financial pressures on both businesses and government entities. While aiming for integrity and authenticity, the bill navigates a complex landscape of inclusivity and administrative capability that will require careful consideration and potentially further legislative refinement.
Issues
The exclusion of self-certified small business concerns owned and controlled by women from government goals (Section 2) might be seen as discriminatory or not fully inclusive of all women-owned businesses, potentially leading to legal and ethical concerns about fair treatment and equal opportunity.
The effective date of the amendment relying on the issuance of regulations by the Administrator (Section 2(a)(2)) could delay implementation, affecting the timely inclusion of women-owned businesses in government goals and potentially causing political repercussions.
The criteria for being 'deemed to have been certified' under subsection (b)(1)(A) (Section 2(b)(1)(A)) may result in inconsistencies or confusion about the certification status of some businesses, which could lead to legal challenges or operational difficulties for businesses and the Administration.
The rulemaking deadline of 'not later than one year after the date of enactment' (Section 2(b)(2)) could be considered too lenient, potentially leading to delays in enforcement and reducing the effectiveness of the legislation in promoting women-owned small businesses.
The term 'deemed to have been certified' (Section 2(b)(1)(A)) may be unclear and could lead to misinterpretation or misuse, potentially requiring further clarification to prevent legal ambiguities.
The lack of authorized appropriations to carry out the Act (Section 2(e)) might hinder effective implementation due to resource constraints, raising financial concerns about the Small Business Administration's ability to meet new requirements.
The briefing requirements (Section 2(c)) could impose a significant administrative burden on the Small Business Administration due to the specificity and frequency of the reporting, leading to potential operational and financial strain.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section gives the official name of the legislation, which is "WOSB Certification and Opportunity Expansion Act."
2. Exclusion of self-certified small business concerns owned and controlled by women from goals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill changes how the government sets goals for contracts with small businesses owned by women. From now on, only those businesses certified officially will count towards these goals, not those just claiming to meet the criteria. It also requires regular updates on how many businesses apply for certification and how this affects costs and outreach efforts.