Overview
Title
To require the National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board to submit an annual report on the activities of the Board and other information, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7104 is a plan that asks a special group to write a yearly story about what they do to help small businesses and share ideas to make these businesses even better. This group has to send this story to important people in the government, but they won't get extra money to do it.
Summary AI
H.R. 7104 is a bill that aims to enhance the responsibilities of the National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board. It requires the Board to submit an annual report detailing its activities and providing recommendations for improving small business development programs. This report must be sent to relevant committees in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill also states that no extra funds will be authorized for implementing these changes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 7104, titled the "National SBDC Advisory Board Improvement Act," is proposed legislation aimed at enhancing the accountability and effectiveness of the National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board. The primary requirement of the bill is for the board to submit an annual report detailing its activities, making recommendations for improving the small business development center program, and providing any other relevant information. The bill explicitly states that these tasks should be conducted without any additional funding.
Summary of Significant Issues
While the bill's intention is to improve the oversight and performance of small business development centers through regular reporting, certain issues are evident:
Lack of Transparency in Amendment Impact: The bill references amendments to the Small Business Act but does not include the existing text of the section it seeks to amend. This omission makes it challenging for stakeholders to fully understand the changes and their implications.
Vague Reporting Requirements: The bill uses broad terms such as "such other information," which could lead to inconsistent and subjective reporting. The lack of clear guidelines might undermine the purpose of having reliable and objective reports.
Compliance with Fiscal Neutrality: The provision ensuring no additional funds are used does not outline specific measures to maintain budget neutrality. This absence could lead to uncertainties in financial administration.
Evaluation of Recommendations: The bill does not specify criteria for assessing the board's recommendations. This could result in arbitrary changes to the small business development programs without adequate justification or efficacy.
Discretionary Power of the Board: The language grants the board substantial discretion in report content, which may lead to inconsistent reporting practices and affect the objectivity of the information provided.
Broader Public Impact
If enacted, this bill could lead to enhanced transparency and oversight of small business development initiatives, potentially benefiting small businesses by providing them with more efficient and targeted services. By requiring the board to report annually, it might also create a structured feedback loop for continuous improvement.
However, the issues highlighted, particularly the vagueness and potential inconsistencies in reporting, may hinder these improvements. Without clear guidelines and transparency, the very tool meant to enhance program effectiveness could fall short of its objectives, potentially resulting in inefficient use of resources or stagnation of necessary reforms.
Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
Small Business Owners: If the board effectively identifies and implements improvements, small businesses could see more tailored support services, improving their chances of success and growth. However, inconclusive or ineffective reports could delay or dilute potential improvements.
Advisory Board Members: The board may face challenges in balancing its wide discretionary powers with the need for accountability and transparency. The lack of additional funding means that board members will need to ensure they fulfill these duties within existing resources, which could be a constraint.
Policymakers and Legislators: The bill's vague provisions could create difficulties in holding the board accountable for meaningful outcomes. Policymakers might need to revisit the legislation for clarifications or amendments if the initial framework does not produce the desired results.
Overall, while H.R. 7104 intends to strengthen the performance of small business development centers, addressing its ambiguities and ensuring a robust evaluation mechanism for board recommendations will be crucial in maximizing its positive impact.
Issues
The amendment to Section 21(i) of the Small Business Act is referenced without providing the current wording of that section, making it difficult for stakeholders to assess the full impact and consequences of the proposed changes. This could lead to misunderstanding or lack of transparency about the amendment's effects. [Section 2]
The term 'such other information' in paragraph (3)(B) is vague and could lead to overly broad interpretations of what information should be included in the report. This lack of specificity might result in inconsistent reporting and hinder accountability. [Section 2]
The language regarding compliance with 'cutgo' does not specify mechanisms to ensure that spending does not increase, potentially leading to ambiguities in financial management and challenges in maintaining budget neutrality. [Section 2, Compliance with cutgo]
Without specific criteria for evaluating the recommendations for improving the small business development center program, the efficacy and relevance of these recommendations could be questioned. This lack of criteria could also result in arbitrary or ineffective program adjustments. [Section 2]
The phrase 'such other information with respect to such program that the Board determines appropriate' grants the Board significant discretion, which may lead to inconsistent or subjective reporting and could potentially diminish the report's objectivity and reliability. [Section 2]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that the short title of this legislation is the “National SBDC Advisory Board Improvement Act.”
2. National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board annual report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Small Business Act to require the National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board to create an annual report for Congress. This report should include recommendations for improving the small business development center program and any other relevant information the Board sees fit to include, with no additional funding authorized for these activities.