Overview
Title
To amend the Small Business Act to require Federal agencies to testify and report on scores received under the scorecard program for evaluating Federal agency compliance with small business contracting goals, to testify for failure to meet Governmentwide contracting goals, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7103 wants to make sure government agencies do a good job giving work to small businesses. If they don't get high scores for doing this, they have to talk to Congress about why they didn't do well.
Summary AI
H.R. 7103, known as the "Agency Accountability Act of 2024," proposes changes to the Small Business Act to require federal agencies to discuss and report on their performance related to small business contracting goals. If a federal agency does not receive an "A" or higher on the scorecard for meeting these goals, or fails to meet certain governmentwide targets, the agency must testify before specific congressional committees. The bill also aims to enhance reporting measures to improve agency scores on these scorecards. Additionally, it states that no further funding will be provided to implement the changes introduced by the act.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Agency Accountability Act of 2024
The "Agency Accountability Act of 2024" aims to enhance accountability among Federal agencies in fulfilling small business contracting goals. It proposes changes to the Small Business Act, compelling Federal agencies to testify before specific Congressional committees if they fail to achieve optimal scores on a designated scorecard or meet Governmentwide contracting objectives. The bill underscores the importance of monitoring and reporting to ensure agencies strive to meet these goals. Notably, the legislation also aligns with CUTGO, indicating no additional funding will be allocated for its implementation.
Key Issues Identified
Several significant issues arise from the bill's text. Firstly, the method for determining the "A" grade on the scorecard is unspecified, potentially leading to inconsistent application across agencies. Without clear criteria, agencies may find it challenging to align efforts with expectations. Furthermore, the bill lacks detailed steps or consequences for agencies failing to meet goals, aside from the testimony requirement. This absence of clear corrective measures may limit the bill's effectiveness in driving accountability. Additionally, terms such as "scorecard" and "Governmentwide goals" are used without defining them, creating potential for misunderstandings.
A similar problem extends to the requirement for agencies to improve scorecard scores. The bill does not clarify the standards or assign responsibility, possibly resulting in ambiguity in execution. Lastly, while the bill states compliance with CUTGO by not authorizing additional appropriations, it raises concerns about funding sources for implementing its mandates.
Potential Impacts on the Public and Stakeholders
The proposed changes, if effectively implemented, could broadly benefit the public by ensuring that federal contracting processes are more transparent and equitable, particularly for small businesses. Enhanced accountability measures would compel agencies to strive towards meeting small business contracting goals, potentially increasing opportunities and fostering a competitive business environment.
For Federal agencies, the bill presents a dual-edged sword. On the positive side, it encourages a more methodical and goal-driven approach to contracting with small businesses. However, the lack of clear evaluation criteria and the absence of enforcement mechanisms could lead to operational challenges, making compliance more burdensome rather than beneficial.
Small businesses might view this legislation positively, as it pledges to hold agencies accountable for meeting contracting goals, potentially leveling the playing field. Conversely, without substantial oversight and clear improvement processes, the bill could fail to bring about meaningful change, leaving small businesses without the increased opportunities the bill intends to foster.
In summary, while the "Agency Accountability Act of 2024" outlines a commitment to improving federal agency accountability, the absence of defined metrics, enforcement mechanisms, and clarified responsibilities may hinder its effectiveness. Addressing these issues could bolster the bill's impact in advancing small business interests within federal contracting.
Issues
The bill does not specify the criteria or methodology used to determine the score equivalent to a letter grade of 'A' on the scorecard. This ambiguity could lead to inconsistencies and fairness concerns in evaluating federal agencies' compliance with small business contracting goals. (Section 2)
There is a lack of clarity about specific actions or measures that should be taken by a federal agency if it fails to meet the scorecard requirements or Governmentwide goals, aside from providing testimony. This absence of detailed guidance could undermine the effectiveness of the accountability mechanism. (Section 2)
The amendment does not address any enforcement mechanisms or consequences for federal agencies that repeatedly fail to achieve the required scores or goals, which may result in a lack of accountability and motivation to meet these objectives. (Section 2)
Terms like 'scorecard' and 'Governmentwide goals' are utilized without adequate definitions or context, potentially leading to misunderstandings and misinterpretation about expectations and requirements for federal agencies. (Section 2)
The amendment lacks information on the criteria or standards used for the scorecard, leading to possible difficulties in assessing the intent and impact of the amendment. Without transparent evaluation metrics, improvements might be hard to quantify or achieve. (Section 3)
There is no specification as to which federal agency or agencies are responsible for improving the scorecard scores, which could create ambiguity in accountability and hinder the efficient implementation of improvements. (Section 3)
The bill does not outline any specific spending or funding sources, presenting potential challenges for financial planning and implementation of the required amendments. This could raise questions about the financial feasibility and sustainability of the proposed changes. (Section 4)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section specifies that the official title of the legislation is the "Agency Accountability Act of 2024."
2. Federal agency testimony on scorecard scores and failure to achieve certain goals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Small Business Act requires that the head of a designated office in a Federal agency must testify before certain Congressional committees if the agency does not get a top score on an official scorecard or if it fails to meet multiple government goals.
3. Federal agency reporting on scorecard scores Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section changes the Small Business Act to require federal agencies to work on improving their scores on a designated scorecard, in addition to meeting existing goals.
4. Compliance with CUTGO Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 4, the bill states that no extra money can be approved for spending to implement this Act or any changes it makes.