Overview
Title
To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to allow the District of Columbia to receive Federal funding under such Act, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Flood Prevention Act of 2024 wants to change a rule so that Washington, D.C., which is like a small city that acts like a state, can get money from the government to help take care of its land near water, just like other states can.
Summary AI
H. R. 7067, known as the “Flood Prevention Act of 2024,” seeks to amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. The bill aims to make the District of Columbia eligible for federal funding under this Act. Congresswoman Norton introduced this bill, and it has been referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. This change would allow the District of Columbia to receive financial support for coastal zone management, similar to states already covered by this law.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, introduced in the House of Representatives as H.R. 7067, seeks to amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to allow the District of Columbia to receive federal funding under this law. The proposed legislation is titled the "Flood Prevention Act of 2024." The primary change put forward is to include the District of Columbia in the list of areas that can benefit from federal funding aimed at managing coastal zones and related concerns such as flood prevention and mitigation.
Significant Issues
The main issue with this bill is that it does not provide justification for the inclusion of the District of Columbia under the Coastal Zone Management Act. This absence of explanation may lead to questions about the necessity and appropriateness of such a measure. Another concern is the bill's lack of detail on how this change might impact existing funding allocations. It fails to address whether additional funding will be provided or if current funding will be redistributed, which could have ramifications for regions already covered by the Act.
Moreover, the bill does not lay out any specific criteria for eligibility or guidance regarding how funds will be allocated and used. This lack of detail could lead to ambiguity in its implementation, potentially resulting in inefficiencies or misuse of resources.
Potential Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, especially those residing in the District of Columbia, the bill could bring about positive changes by providing access to federal resources for flood prevention measures. This could enhance the region's ability to manage and mitigate flooding events, ultimately protecting homes, businesses, and infrastructure. However, without clear guidance on funding levels and distribution, there is a risk that benefits to existing recipients could be diluted, should the funds be reallocated without an increase in the budget.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The primary stakeholders in this context include residents and property owners in the District of Columbia, who stand to benefit from improved flood prevention infrastructure. Local government agencies responsible for managing coastal and flood-related issues would also potentially have access to more resources to support their initiatives.
Conversely, other states and regions covered by the Coastal Zone Management Act might experience a negative impact if their existing funding is reduced or reallocated to accommodate the inclusion of the District of Columbia, especially if the total funds available are not increased. This could impact ongoing projects and the ability of these regions to effectively manage coastal zones.
In conclusion, while the bill offers potential benefits in the form of increased resources for flood prevention in the District of Columbia, it raises significant questions about funding allocations and the necessity of its provisions, highlighting the need for further clarification and detail to ensure balanced and effective implementation.
Issues
The amendment proposes including the District of Columbia for Federal funding under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 without providing justification for this inclusion. This could raise questions regarding the necessity and appropriateness of this addition, potentially leading to political debates. (Section 2)
The bill does not specify how including the District of Columbia would impact existing funding allocations to other regions, nor does it clarify if additional funding will be made available. This could lead to budgetary and reallocation concerns. (Section 2)
The proposed amendment lacks detailed criteria for eligibility or specific allocations of funding, which could lead to ambiguity in implementation. This absence of specificity may result in operational inefficiencies or misuse of funds. (Section 2)
The lack of explanation or context for adding the District of Columbia may suggest that the decision is arbitrary or politically motivated without further clarification, potentially undermining public trust. (Section 2)
The section only contains the short title of the Act, which does not provide sufficient information to review for potential issues. Additional sections of the bill are needed for a comprehensive audit. (Section 1)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the "Flood Prevention Act of 2024."
2. Eligibility of District of Columbia for Federal funding under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 by adding the District of Columbia to the list of locations eligible for federal funding under the Act.