Overview

Title

To provide a guaranteed income for older youth who have exited foster care.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 7038 is a bill that plans to give older kids who were in foster care and left before they turned 16 a gift of $12,000 each year to help them live on their own. It asks the states to enroll these kids automatically into the program and teach them about managing money.

Summary AI

H.R. 7038, titled the "Guaranteed Income for Foster Youth Act," aims to provide a guaranteed annual income of up to $12,000 for older youth who have exited foster care. The bill proposes changes to the Social Security Act to enable these benefits for individuals up to 27 years old who were in foster care after age 14 and exited after age 16. States are required to automatically enroll eligible youth and provide financial literacy education, with special accommodations for disabled youth. The program will submit regular reports on its progress and impact, while ensuring the privacy of participants is protected.

Published

2024-01-18
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-01-18
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7038ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,591
Pages:
9
Sentences:
28

Language

Nouns: 423
Verbs: 120
Adjectives: 89
Adverbs: 15
Numbers: 39
Entities: 63

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.04
Average Sentence Length:
56.82
Token Entropy:
4.94
Readability (ARI):
29.39

AnalysisAI

A General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 7038, titled the "Guaranteed Income for Foster Youth Act," seeks to provide financial support to older youth who have exited the foster care system. The bill proposes amendments to the Social Security Act, allowing former foster youths up to 27 years old to receive a guaranteed income. The eligible youths would receive $12,000 annually over a period of five years. Automatic enrollment in the program is a noteworthy feature, ensuring eligible youths receive support seamlessly. Additionally, the bill includes provisions for financial literacy education and special assistance for disabled youths.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several key concerns have been identified regarding the bill's potential implementation and impact:

  1. Financial Implications: The annual provision of $12,000 might be perceived as excessive or unsustainable depending on the program's overall budget and the number of beneficiaries.

  2. Administrative Complexities: The automatic enrollment process and coordination with existing state-level benefits programs could result in administrative complications.

  3. Selection and Participation: The bill requires consultation with various organizations for implementation planning, yet lacks clear criteria for selecting these bodies. This could lead to favoritism or bias.

  4. Data Privacy and Reporting: While reporting requirements want insights into diverse participant demographics, they may put the privacy of sensitive information at risk if not adequately protected.

  5. Support for Disabled Youths: The provision for “reasonable accommodations” for disabled participants lacks clarity, potentially leading to inconsistent interpretations and implementations.

Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact

This bill has the potential to offer significant financial relief to former foster youths, addressing issues of poverty and enhancing their economic stability. The financial independence facilitated by the income may lead to better health, education, and overall well-being. Additionally, increased financial security could reduce reliance on other federal support programs, saving costs in other areas.

For the public, supporting former foster youths can decrease social service burdens and foster a more equitable society where vulnerable individuals are given the support needed to thrive. However, allocating sufficient funds to support the proposed income guarantees may require budget reallocations or increased taxes, impacting taxpayers.

Specific Stakeholders

  • Former Foster Youths: The primary beneficiaries stand to gain immediate financial support, which could improve their life outcomes, including job stability, education attainment, and mental health.

  • State Administrations and Agencies: They will be tasked with new responsibilities, including program implementation, reporting, and ensuring privacy protections—all of which may pose bureaucratic and logistical challenges.

  • Nonprofit and Community Organizations: These groups are expected to play a role in planning and executing the program. Without clear guidelines, their selection process might become contentious and influence the program's effectiveness.

  • Taxpayers: Funding such an initiative might necessitate changes in fiscal allocations, impacting public funds' availability for other essential services.

Overall, while the bill aims to address the critical needs of a vulnerable population, its success hinges on careful planning, clear directives, and thorough consideration of administrative and financial feasibilities. It is essential to strike a balance between providing substantial support to former foster youths and managing the program's practicality and impact on other stakeholders.

Financial Assessment

The proposed legislation, H.R. 7038, known as the "Guaranteed Income for Foster Youth Act," references a specific and significant financial aspect aimed at providing assistance to former foster youth.

Financial Allocation

The bill proposes a guaranteed income of $12,000 annually for eligible former foster care youths. This allocation is meant for individuals who were in foster care after reaching the age of 14, exited after turning 16, and are under 27 years of age. The purpose of this financial benefit is to provide unconditional cash assistance to help these young adults transition into independent living.

Relating to Identified Issues

Annual Benefits Cap
One of the issues relates to the $12,000 annual cap on cash benefits per youth. While this amount is set to provide substantial support to those transitioning out of foster care, there could be debates about whether this financial allocation is excessive or wasteful, considering budget constraints and the total number of potential beneficiaries.

Automatic Enrollment Process
The bill requires automatic enrollment of eligible youths into the program, which might face challenges, particularly concerning coordinating start times across different states. Each youth over 18 is to be automatically enrolled, but the precise implementation mechanism might require additional clarification to prevent confusion and ensure timely distribution of funds.

Use of Funds vs. Other Benefits
The legislation specifies that the cash benefits should be disregarded when determining eligibility for other Federal or state-supported programs. This raises potential complications in aligning with state-level benefit programs, necessitating a thoughtful approach to prevent redundant benefits while ensuring comprehensive support for the targeted demographic.

Reporting Requirements
The act mandates states to submit interim and final reports on the program's progress and impact, including demographic data. Although the primary goal is to ensure transparency and accountability in the use of funds, the requirement for detailed documentation might introduce significant administrative burdens without clear guidance on how this feedback will be utilized to improve the program.

In sum, while the bill sets out a clear financial commitment to assist former foster youth, its implementation will require careful management to address practical challenges, such as program coordination across states and maintaining alignment with other benefit programs. Moreover, the financial specifics will be crucial to ensuring the initiative effectively meets its goals without encountering inefficiencies or administrative hurdles.

Issues

  • The provision of $12,000 per 12 months to eligible youths (Section 2(k)(1)(C)) may be considered high or wasteful depending on the overall budget and the number of recipients.

  • The language around the automatic enrollment process (Section 2(b)(3)(L)(iii) and Section 2(k)(1)(B)) is somewhat confusing, particularly how it will be managed in states with differing start times.

  • The bill mandates wide consultation with private and public organizations (Section 2(b)(3)(L)(i)), but there is no clarity on how these bodies will be selected, potentially favoring certain organizations.

  • The interim and final reporting requirements (Section 2(k)(1)(F) and Section 2(k)(1)(G)) may create administrative burdens without clear value, and there is a lack of detail on how feedback will be utilized or addressed.

  • The bill states that the benefits will be disregarded when determining eligibility for other programs (Section 2(k)(2)), but it might cause complications in coordination with state-level benefits.

  • The bill does not clearly define 'reasonable accommodations' for youth with disabilities (Section 2(k)(1)(E)(ii)), which could lead to inconsistent application.

  • The reporting requirements include disaggregation by sensitive categories such as race, ethnicity, and disability status (Section 2(k)(1)(F)(i)(I)), without detailing adequate privacy protections aside from redacting personally identifiable information (Section 2(k)(1)(F)(ii)).

  • There is a lack of specificity on how 'voluntariness' of youth participation in research will be ensured (Section 2(k)(1)(H)), potentially leading to ethical issues.

  • The timeline for automatic enrollment after program initiation (Section 2(k)(1)(B)) might be unclear and needs further clarification, especially for those youths aged out before the effective date.

  • The bill references a 'local public or private nonprofit entity' for consultation (Section 2(b)(3)(L)(i)) without defining qualification criteria, leaving room for favoritism.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act is called the "Guaranteed Income for Foster Youth Act."

2. Guaranteed income for older youth who have exited foster care Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section proposes changes to the Social Security Act to provide guaranteed income to former foster youth up to age 27. It details enrollment procedures, benefits provisions, and compliance requirements for states, ensuring that eligible youth receive cash benefits and financial literacy education, with special support for those with disabilities.

Money References

  • (B) ENROLLMENT.—Each youth eligible for benefits under the program who has attained 18 years of age shall be automatically enrolled in the program— “(i) in the case of a youth who attained such age before the effective date of this subsection, on the effective date; or “(ii) in the case of a youth who attains such age on or after the effective date, on the date the youth attains such age. “(C) LIMITATION ON ANNUAL BENEFITS.—The total amount of cash benefits to be provided for a youth under the program in any period of 12 consecutive months shall be $12,000.