Overview
Title
To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to modify requirements relating to the regulation and examination of credit union organizations and service providers, to provide the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency with the authority to regulate the provision of services provided to the Government-sponsored enterprises and Federal Home Loan Banks, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 7036 is a bill that tries to make rules stronger for banks and credit unions, especially on computer safety to keep everyone's money safe. It also gives one person, the Director of a big housing group, the power to check on how these banks get help from others, making sure it's all done right.
Summary AI
H. R. 7036, known as the “Strengthening Cybersecurity for the Financial Sector Act of 2024,” aims to update regulations for credit union organizations and service providers. It amends the Federal Credit Union Act by changing certain notification and procedural requirements and removes a specific subsection. Additionally, the bill grants the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency authority to regulate and examine services provided to Government-sponsored enterprises and Federal Home Loan Banks, ensuring they are notified of service relationships within 30 days. The bill also clarifies that States retain their regulatory powers over such entities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
This bill, titled the "Strengthening Cybersecurity for the Financial Sector Act of 2024," aims to amend the Federal Credit Union Act and the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992. It focuses on updating how credit union organizations and service providers are regulated and examined. Additionally, it grants the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency the authority to oversee services provided to government-sponsored enterprises and Federal Home Loan Banks. Further, it touches upon the regulation of third-party service providers engaged by financial entities.
Significant Issues
One of the prominent issues within the bill is the lack of clarity in the language and scope, especially regarding how the Federal Housing Finance Agency will regulate activities performed by service providers. The absence of specific criteria for regulation and examination could lead to inconsistencies and legal challenges. For instance, the bill allows activities to be monitored whether they occur on or off premises, which could potentially lead to jurisdictional conflicts.
Another significant point of ambiguity is the removal of a subsection without providing the previous content or context, making it difficult to assess the impact of its removal. Furthermore, the obligation to notify officials within thirty days about service relationships may lack the flexibility needed to accommodate complex or delayed transactions, which could inadvertently lead to penalties.
Additionally, the term "service provider" is not clearly defined, leading to uncertainty about the scope of the bill. This could cause compliance issues and legal ambiguity among those who fall under its jurisdiction.
Impacts on the Public
Broadly, the bill strives to enhance the security and regulation of financial services, which could potentially lead to increased consumer confidence in credit unions and financial entities. By attempting to strengthen oversight, the bill may protect consumers from potential cybersecurity threats and ensure financial stability.
However, the unclear language and requirements might create challenges for stakeholders in the financial sector. The ambiguity surrounding regulatory criteria could result in inconsistent enforcement, which might hinder the bill's effectiveness in achieving its cybersecurity objectives.
Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
For financial institutions, particularly credit unions and the Federal Home Loan Banks, the bill might mean an increase in compliance responsibilities and scrutiny from regulatory bodies. This change could impose additional administrative burdens and potential costs, particularly if the institutions must adapt to new regulations without clear guidance.
Service providers that engage with these financial institutions might face uncertainty due to the bill's lack of precise definitions and standards. They may struggle to understand whether they fall within the bill's scope and how to comply effectively.
State governments could face challenges due to potential conflicts between state and federal regulations. The bill acknowledges state powers but does not provide guidelines on resolving any overlaps, which could lead to disputes and impact regulatory efficiency.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to bolster cybersecurity and oversight in the financial sector, its ambiguous language and requirements pose challenges that need to be addressed to ensure clear, effective, and cohesive implementation.
Issues
The language used in Section 3 regarding regulation and examination standards by the Federal Housing Finance Agency is vague. The lack of specific criteria could lead to inconsistent enforcement and potential legal challenges due to ambiguity in implementation.
Section 3 allows activities to be regulated whether performed on or off premises, which could lead to jurisdictional conflicts. This broad authority might present legal challenges or conflicts with existing state regulations.
The removal of subsection (f) in Section 2 lacks context, making it difficult to assess the implications of its removal. Understanding the previous content of this subsection is crucial to determine what changes might occur.
The lack of definition for 'service provider' in Section 3 could lead to uncertainty about which entities or activities fall under the regulation, potentially causing compliance issues and legal ambiguity.
Section 2 introduces a change in language from 'that' to 'an', but without additional context, the impact of this change is unclear. Stakeholders may face difficulties in understanding how this alteration affects the regulation process.
The requirement for notification within thirty days in both Sections 3 and 1329 might lack flexibility, potentially leading to penalties if unforeseen circumstances delay compliance. This could be troublesome for complex service relationships.
The potential for conflicts between state and federal regulations is highlighted in Section 1329's rule of construction. Without clear guidance on resolving these conflicts, entities might face legal uncertainty and disputes.
The short title provided in Section 1, 'Strengthening Cybersecurity for the Financial Sector Act of 2024', lacks detail about the methods and scope of its cybersecurity measures, raising concerns about the adequacy and focus of the legislation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states the official title of the legislation as the “Strengthening Cybersecurity for the Financial Sector Act of 2024.”
2. Regulation and examination of credit union organizations and service providers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to Section 206A of the Federal Credit Union Act involve three changes: replacing the word "that" with "an" in subsection (a)(1), specifying how the Board should be notified in subsection (c)(2), and removing subsection (f) entirely.
3. Regulation of service providers by the Federal Housing Finance Agency Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 has added a new section stating that when a regulated entity or the Office of Finance handles permitted activities through outside service providers, those activities are subject to the same regulations and inspections as if done internally. They must also notify the Director about the service relationship within 30 days. This does not interfere with state powers over such entities.
1329. Regulation and examination of certain service providers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Whenever a regulated entity or the Office of Finance hires someone else to do work for them, the Director has the same control over checking and overseeing that work as if the entity or Office were doing it themselves. Additionally, within thirty days of creating a service contract, they must inform the Director. States can still use their own powers to oversee these entities as well.