Overview

Title

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to periodically review final rules issued by the Commission and to amend the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to require the Securities and Exchange Commission to consider the cumulative effect of proposed and final rules, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The "REG Act of 2024" is like asking the grown-ups who make rules for trading companies to check their rules every five years to see if they still make sense and keep everyone safe while playing fair. They also have to make sure these rules don’t pile up and cause confusing problems.

Summary AI

H.R. 7030, titled the "Review the Expansion of Government Act of 2024" or "REG Act of 2024," requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to review its final rules every five years to determine if any changes are needed to help with capital formation, maintain fair markets, and protect investors. The SEC must also provide a public report to Congress detailing their review plan and outcomes. Additionally, the bill amends several securities regulations to ensure that the SEC considers the cumulative effect of all proposed and final rules.

Published

2024-01-18
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-01-18
Package ID: BILLS-118hr7030ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
854
Pages:
4
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 231
Verbs: 71
Adjectives: 39
Adverbs: 18
Numbers: 46
Entities: 59

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.25
Average Sentence Length:
56.93
Token Entropy:
4.67
Readability (ARI):
30.72

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the "Review the Expansion of Government Act of 2024" or the "REG Act of 2024," aims to enhance the oversight and efficiency of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It mandates the SEC to periodically review, every five years, the final rules it issues. This requirement extends to rules created under several significant financial laws, including the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, among others. Additionally, the bill requires that these reviews consider the cumulative impact of all rules — existing and proposed — to ensure they facilitate capital formation, maintain orderly markets, and protect investors.

Summary of Significant Issues

An important issue with this bill is the lack of clear criteria and funding mechanisms for the SEC's periodic reviews. Without specified guidelines, the reviews could become inconsistent and unclear, leading to potential inefficiencies and questions about enforceability. Moreover, the bill mandates the SEC to consider the cumulative effect of regulations but does not adequately define how these effects should be assessed, leaving room for varied interpretations.

The text of the bill itself is repetitive, particularly concerning the description of cumulative regulations, which might lead to confusion during implementation. Furthermore, the use of ambiguous terms such as "not later than 5 years" for initiating reviews can create unpredictability in enforcement timelines. Lastly, the bill's short title might mislead stakeholders about its precise focus, potentially affecting its reception among lawmakers and the public.

Potential Public Impact

Broadly, the bill aims to ensure that the SEC remains vigilant in evaluating the relevance and impact of its regulations, which could safeguard the financial markets' integrity. This could have positive implications for the general public by striving to maintain fair investment conditions and increasing confidence in U.S. financial institutions.

Conversely, the unclear aspects of the bill might lead to inefficiencies or delays in its execution, which could hamper its intended benefits to the public. Potential confusion during rule interpretation and implementation could also mean that genuine concerns — like investors' protections or market fairness — are not adequately prioritized.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The bill could significantly affect financial institutions, investment companies, and advisers, as they often are directly regulated by the SEC's rules. If handled effectively, the regular review and consideration of cumulative regulatory effects could reduce redundant or conflicting regulations, potentially easing compliance burdens for these stakeholders. This could subsequently lower costs and foster a more straightforward regulatory environment conducive to business growth.

On the downside, without clear criteria or a process to assess the cumulative effects of regulations, these stakeholders could face uncertainty or frequent regulatory changes, which might translate into increased administrative costs and compliance challenges. Furthermore, if the SEC struggles with funding or executing the mandated reviews, it could delay resolutions on regulatory issues crucial to these stakeholders, leaving them in a state of limbo.

In summary, while the REG Act of 2024 has the potential to improve SEC oversight and promote efficient capital formation, it may need further clarification to ensure effective implementation and maximize its benefits for the public and specific stakeholders.

Issues

  • Section 2: Lack of clarity in criteria and funding for periodic reviews by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could lead to inefficient spending and ambiguous decision-making, raising concerns about the effectiveness and enforceability of the mandate.

  • Section 3: The requirement for the SEC to consider the cumulative effect of regulations lacks clear guidelines on how cumulative effects should be quantified or assessed, potentially leading to inconsistent interpretation and application of the law.

  • Section 3: Repetitive language regarding the cumulative consideration of regulations makes the bill text overly complex, which could result in administrative confusion and difficulty in implementation.

  • Section 2: The absence of a precise definition for the term 'not later than 5 years' could lead to misinterpretation and inconsistency in review timelines, impacting the predictability of regulatory reviews.

  • Section 1: The short title 'Review the Expansion of Government Act of 2024' is ambiguous and may mislead stakeholders about the bill's specific focus, potentially influencing public perception and legislative support.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act specifies its short title, stating that it may be referred to as the “Review the Expansion of Government Act of 2024” or the “REG Act of 2024.”

2. Periodic review of final rules required Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Securities and Exchange Commission must review each of its final rules every 5 years to decide if changes are needed to support capital formation, keep markets fair and orderly, or protect investors. Additionally, the Commission must report to Congress on their review plans within a year of this law's enactment and update on reviewed rules and any unmet plans every 5 years.

3. Consideration of cumulative effect of regulations required Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines amendments to various financial acts, ensuring that any rules or regulations, considered both alone and together with others, promote desired objectives. These amendments apply to the Securities Act, Securities Exchange Act, Investment Company Act, and Investment Advisers Act, emphasizing the cumulative impact of regulations.