Overview
Title
To award grants to States to establish or improve, and carry out, Seal of Biliteracy programs to recognize high-level student proficiency in speaking, reading, and writing in both English and a second language, and early language programs.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 7007 is a plan to give money to states to help them make special programs that award kids who can speak and write well in English and another language. It wants $10 million each year to make these programs fair and open to everyone, including giving extra help to students who might need it.
Summary AI
H.R. 7007 aims to provide grants to states to create or improve Seal of Biliteracy programs, which recognize students who demonstrate a high level of proficiency in English and a second language. The bill encourages language learning by including criteria for both speaking and writing skills and may include reading and listening skills as well. It ensures inclusivity for English learners, students with disabilities, and Native American languages, and outlines how grant funds should be used, including for administrative costs and public outreach. The bill authorizes $10 million per year from 2024 to 2028 to support these initiatives.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The Biliteracy Education Seal and Teaching Act, or the "BEST Act," is a congressional bill introduced to promote and recognize bilingual proficiency among students in the United States. The legislation aims to award competitive grants to states to either establish or enhance Seal of Biliteracy programs. These programs are designed to certify students' high-level proficiency in English and a second language. It also includes early language programs to support this goal. The initiative underscores the cognitive, educational, and economic advantages of biliteracy, hoping that such recognition can better prepare students for the diverse linguistic demands of the 21st century.
Significant Issues
Several issues emerge from the bill that are noteworthy. Transparency and Equity are central concerns, especially regarding the Secretary of Education’s discretion in renewing state grants. This discretionary power may lead to uneven resource distribution across states. The inclusion of Native American languages presents challenges in maintaining consistent proficiency standards, given the diverse linguistic landscape of Native languages. Additionally, the restriction of one grant per state might hinder larger states with a broader array of linguistic needs, thereby impacting equitable access to the program and its resources.
Furthermore, the requirement for states to return any unspent funds could inadvertently pressure them into unnecessary spending to avoid losing these resources. The definitions within the bill, particularly concerning classical and second languages, raise potential legal and educational ambiguities that might impact program clarity. Lastly, the data supporting the benefits of biliteracy are not detailed, which could undermine the bill's rationale.
Impact on the Public
If successfully implemented, the bill could significantly enhance the linguistic capabilities of students across the nation, better preparing them for both higher education and the workforce in a globally interconnected world. Recognition through a Seal of Biliteracy can open doors for students in competitive job markets and post-secondary education opportunities, capitalizing on the advantages bilingual individuals frequently enjoy, such as higher earnings and increased job opportunities. However, for the general public, the alignment of educational policies with the bill's objectives will be crucial in realizing these potential benefits.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Students and Educators are primary stakeholders likely to benefit from this initiative. Students stand to gain valuable credentials that can aid in their academic and career pursuits, while educators might receive increased support and professional development to strengthen language instruction. State Educational Agencies will play a critical role in implementing these programs but may face challenges with the burdensome application requirements and potential financial pressures associated with returning unspent funds.
Native American communities could see a positive impact if the bill’s recognition of Native American languages as part of biliteracy programs is effectively implemented. However, consistent and equitable implementation across states could be challenging due to the diversity of languages and cultural considerations.
In summary, while the BEST Act has promising objectives in promoting biliteracy and preparing students for a multilingual world, several structural and definitional issues need clarity and resolution to maximize its potential benefits and ensure equitable access for all stakeholders involved.
Financial Assessment
The proposed legislation, H.R. 7007, also known as the "Biliteracy Education Seal and Teaching Act" or the "BEST Act," highlights critical financial considerations tied to its goal of promoting language proficiency among students in the United States. Here is an analysis of how money is being referenced and allocated in the bill.
Financial Allocations
The bill authorizes the appropriation of $10 million per year from 2024 through 2028 to support the establishment or enhancement of Seal of Biliteracy programs across different states. These programs are intended to acknowledge students who achieve high proficiency in both English and a second language. The financial allocation is central to the bill's mission, as it seeks to ensure that all states have the resources to develop and implement rigorous language proficiency evaluations and recognize students' accomplishments formally.
Use of Funds
The allocated funds are designated for various purposes, including: - Administrative Costs: This includes the expenses associated with setting up and managing Seal of Biliteracy programs. - Public Outreach and Education: Funds will be used to raise awareness about the Seal of Biliteracy programs among students, parents, and educators, ensuring wide participation and understanding. - Subgrants: These will be provided to local educational agencies to support professional development for language educators, outreach efforts, and testing fees for low-income students to ensure equitable access to the program.
Financial Issues and Considerations
Several issues are noted with how financial considerations are addressed in the bill:
Discretionary Renewal of Grants: The power given to the Secretary of Education to renew grants at their discretion could lead to a lack of transparency and inconsistent distribution of funds across states. This could be politically and ethically significant, as it may result in imbalanced resource allocation.
Limitations on Grants: The restriction that a state can receive only one grant at any time could be burdensome for larger states with more diverse populations. These states might need more resources to cater to their varied linguistic communities. As such, the limitation may lead to inequitable distribution of resources, presenting a significant political and financial issue.
Return of Unspent Funds: The requirement for states to return any unspent grant funds within six months after the grant term ends could financially pressure states to spend unnecessarily to avoid returning funds. This might lead to wasteful spending rather than efficient use of resources, contradicting the fiscal prudence often associated with public funds.
Conclusion
While the financial provisions in H.R. 7007 lay a foundation for supporting language proficiency programs via the Seal of Biliteracy, considerations regarding the discretionary nature of grant renewals, grant limitations per state, and the pressure to spend funds within a set timeframe present challenges that could affect the bill's effectiveness. These aspects need careful monitoring and potential adjustment to maximize the positive impacts of the authorized funding and ensure fair and efficient distribution and use of resources.
Issues
The discretion given to the Secretary of Education in renewing grants (Section 4, Grant Renewal) may result in a lack of transparency, which is significant politically and ethically. The competitive nature and discretionary renewal process of the grants could lead to unbalanced resource allocation.
The inclusion of Native American languages in the Seal of Biliteracy programs (Section 4, Inclusion of Native American Languages) introduces ambiguity in maintaining consistent standards of proficiency across different languages, which is significant ethically and legally, considering the diverse linguistic landscape.
The limitation of one grant per state at any one time (Section 4, Limitations) could be restrictive for larger states with more diverse linguistic populations, potentially leading to inequitable distribution of resources, a significant political and financial issue.
The requirement for states to return unspent funds 6 months after the grant term ends (Section 4, Return of Unspent Grant Funds) might pressure states financially to spend unnecessarily to avoid returning funds, potentially leading to wasteful spending.
The definition of 'classical language' (Section 3, Definitions) is ambiguous as it generalizes that these languages are no longer spoken, which might not be true for all contexts, leading to potential legal and educational misunderstandings.
The potential exclusion of certain multilingual communities in the definition of 'second language' (Section 3, Definitions) might not fully account for communities where multiple languages, including Native American languages, are in regular use.
The application requirements for states (Section 4, Grant Program) could be excessively burdensome, possibly discouraging participation due to the complexity and detail required, impacting the program's reach and equity.
The lack of specific data or references to studies substantiating claims about the benefits of biliteracy (Section 2, Findings) might undermine the bill's rationale, affecting its reception and political support.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the name of the law is the “Biliteracy Education Seal and Teaching Act” or simply the “BEST Act.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress recognizes the importance of language education and bilingual proficiency, highlighting its benefits for cognitive development, academic achievement, and economic opportunities. Various states have successfully implemented programs, such as the Seal of Biliteracy, to acknowledge students' multilingual skills and encourage others to pursue proficiency in multiple languages.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for terms used in the Act, including references to the meanings given by other laws and acts. It explains terms like "classical language", listing languages such as Greek and Latin, defines what counts as a "second language", which can include sign languages, and clarifies who the "Secretary" refers to as the Secretary of Education.
4. Grants for State Seal of Biliteracy programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section establishes a program for awarding competitive grants to states to create or improve Seal of Biliteracy programs, which recognize students who are proficient in English and a second language, including Native American languages. The program outlines criteria for student proficiency, requires equitable access for students with disabilities, and prohibits charging students fees for participation. The grants can be used for administrative costs, public outreach, and supporting educators, with $10 million authorized annually for 2024-2028.
Money References
- (f) Authorization of appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028.