Overview

Title

To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to procure a statue of Benjamin Franklin for placement in the Capitol.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 6969 is a plan to get a statue of Benjamin Franklin and put it in a special place in the Capitol where people visiting can see it. They have to do this by the start of 2026.

Summary AI

H.R. 6969 directs the Joint Committee on the Library to procure a statue of Benjamin Franklin and place it in the United States Capitol. The bill requires the statue to be obtained through an agreement within two years from the enactment of the bill. Moreover, the statue must be placed in a publicly accessible location within the Capitol by January 1, 2026, where it can be seen during guided tours by the Capitol Visitor Center.

Published

2024-09-18
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-09-18
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6969rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
703
Pages:
4
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 298
Verbs: 25
Adjectives: 8
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 20
Entities: 128

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.74
Average Sentence Length:
87.88
Token Entropy:
4.30
Readability (ARI):
43.20

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

H.R. 6969 is a legislative proposal aimed at honoring one of America's founding fathers, Benjamin Franklin, by procuring and installing a statue of him in the United States Capitol. The responsibility for this task falls to the Joint Committee on the Library. According to the bill, an agreement to acquire this statue must be made within two years of the bill's passage, and the statue should be permanently located in a publicly accessible area of the Capitol by January 1, 2026.

Summary of Significant Issues

While the intent to honor Benjamin Franklin is clear, the bill presents several notable issues. One of the primary concerns is the absence of any mention of the cost or funding mechanism required for acquiring the statue. Without this information, it is challenging to assess financial implications or justify the spending.

Additionally, the bill lacks detailed criteria for what would constitute "appropriate" terms and conditions in the procurement process. This could lead to ambiguities or even accusations of favoritism in selecting who will create the statue. Furthermore, the term "suitable permanent location" invites subjective interpretation, potentially leading to disputes over where the statue should be placed in the Capitol.

Impact on the Public Broadly

From a broader perspective, this bill reflects an intent to celebrate and memorialize the significant contributions of Benjamin Franklin. Such installations might inspire educational enrichment for the public, providing an opportunity for Capitol visitors to engage with the country's history more tangibly.

However, without transparency in funding and procurement, there may be public concern over fiscal responsibility and the efficient use of taxpayer dollars. Clarity in these areas would be necessary to assuage any potential skepticism regarding government spending.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved in the arts and crafts industry, such as sculptors and artisans, the bill might represent an opportunity. Being selected to create a statue for the Capitol is a prestigious honor and could provide significant professional recognition and financial benefit.

On the other hand, government and legislative stakeholders might face scrutiny if the procurement process seems biased or opaque. This could lead to public relations challenges or necessitate additional oversight to ensure a fair and transparent process is maintained.

In conclusion, while celebrating Benjamin Franklin through a statue at the Capitol is a commendable objective, there are aspects of H.R. 6969 that require careful consideration and clarification to ensure that the process meets the expectations of transparency and financial prudence. Addressing these concerns proactively could ensure the project is a source of pride and educational value for the nation.

Issues

  • The bill does not specify the cost or funding source for procuring the statue of Benjamin Franklin. This lack of specificity can make it challenging to evaluate whether the spending is justified, potentially leading to concerns about fiscal responsibility. [Section 1(a)]

  • The absence of explicit criteria for what constitutes 'appropriate' terms and conditions for obtaining the statue could lead to ambiguity or bias in the procurement process. This lack of clarity might result in accusations of favoritism or misuse of funds. [Section 1(a)]

  • The term 'suitable permanent location' is subjective and could lead to disagreements or differing opinions about the placement of the statue. This ambiguity may result in controversy or logistical challenges in selecting an appropriate spot within the Capitol. [Section 1(b)]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Procurement and placement of statue of Benjamin Franklin in the United States Capitol Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section requires the Joint Committee on the Library to make an agreement to get a statue of Benjamin Franklin within two years of the law being passed. The statue must then be placed in a permanent spot in the United States Capitol by January 1, 2026, where it can be viewed during guided tours.