Overview

Title

To establish limitations on advanced payments for bus rolling stock, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 6964 is a plan to handle the money used to buy buses better. It says buyers can pay some money upfront for buses, but not more than 20% of the total, and they must have clear, signed agreements first.

Summary AI

H.R. 6964 proposes limitations on advance payments for purchasing bus rolling stock, a kind of public transportation equipment. The bill amends Section 5323 of Title 49, U.S. Code, allowing recipients of certain federal assistance to make advance payments for bus purchases without needing a performance bond from the vehicle manufacturer. However, it requires that a signed purchase order and contract be in place, along with preaward authority and compliance with specific legal requirements, and it restricts advance payments to not exceed 20% of the total purchase order value.

Published

2024-01-11
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-01-11
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6964ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
338
Pages:
2
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 103
Verbs: 24
Adjectives: 18
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 12
Entities: 22

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.20
Average Sentence Length:
37.56
Token Entropy:
4.68
Readability (ARI):
20.35

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The proposed bill, H. R. 6964, aims to set limitations on advanced payments for bus rolling stock, which are the buses and related vehicles used in public transportation systems. It intends to allow recipients of federal assistance to make advance payments on bus purchases without requiring the vehicle manufacturer to obtain a performance bond or any similar financial protections. However, several conditions are imposed: the recipient must have a signed purchase order and contract, preaward authority, satisfy certain legal requirements, and ensure that any advance payment does not exceed 20% of the purchase order's total value.

Significant Issues

Several significant issues arise from this proposed legislation:

  1. Financial Risk and Public Fund Protection: By allowing advance payments without the need for performance bonds, there is an increased risk of financial loss if the manufacturer fails to deliver the vehicles. This change raises concerns about the effective use and protection of public funds.

  2. Market Competition Limitations: The requirement for a signed purchase order and an executed contract may disproportionately favor established manufacturers. This could potentially disadvantage smaller or newer entrants without pre-existing financial structures or partnerships, thereby limiting competition in the marketplace.

  3. Clarity and Accessibility of Legal Terms: The bill's reliance on specific legal and regulatory terms, such as 'preaward authority' and references to other legal subsections, may present challenges to those not deeply familiar with the regulatory framework. This complexity could lead to misunderstandings and difficulties in compliance among recipients.

  4. Ambiguity in Payment Limit Criteria: The provision lacks clear guidelines on whether there are exceptions or additional criteria concerning the 20% advance payment limit. This vagueness may lead to varied interpretations, resulting in inconsistent application across different funding recipients and projects.

Potential Public Impact

The bill can have widespread implications, especially in how public transportation agencies manage their vehicle procurement. If manufacturers do not deliver, the public could face delays in accessing necessary transportation services, affecting daily commutes and broader economic activities. Moreover, any misuse or mismanaged public funds could result in budgetary constraints, impacting future transportation projects and services.

Stakeholder Implications

Positive Impacts:

  • For large, established vehicle manufacturers, this bill might streamline the procurement process by eliminating the need for performance bonds. This could lead to quicker transactions and potentially improved cash flow by securing payments upfront.

  • Public transportation agencies might benefit from potentially faster vehicle acquisition due to streamlined financial processes.

Negative Impacts:

  • Smaller manufacturers could find themselves at a disadvantage, unable to compete effectively with larger entities that have the requisite financial arrangements and relationships. This might stifle innovation and opportunities for emerging players in the bus manufacturing industry.

  • Public agencies and local governments may bear additional financial risks, with the potential loss of funds if a manufacturer fails to meet contractual obligations.

In conclusion, while the bill seeks to facilitate vehicle procurement for public transportation, it introduces risks and challenges that need careful consideration. Balancing these risks with the potential benefits requires thoughtful evaluation by lawmakers, industry stakeholders, and the public to ensure that both efficiency and financial prudence are achieved.

Issues

  • The provision allowing for advanced payments on bus rolling stock vehicles without requiring a performance bond or similar financial arrangement (Section 1) could lead to financial risks or loss if the manufacturer fails to deliver. This raises significant concerns regarding the protection of public funds.

  • The requirement of a signed purchase order and an executed contract with a transit vehicle manufacturer in Section 1 might favor manufacturers who already have structured financial arrangements or partnerships, potentially limiting competition from newer or smaller manufacturers.

  • The language regarding 'preaward authority' and requirements under subsection (m) and section 5318(e) in Section 1 may be unclear or inaccessible to those unfamiliar with specific legal and regulatory terms, leading to potential misunderstandings. This could affect compliance and implementation among recipients.

  • The provision's lack of clarity on whether exceptions or additional criteria might apply to the 20 percent advance payment limit in Section 1 creates ambiguity in its application, potentially leading to varied interpretations and inconsistent application across different projects.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Limitations on advanced payments for bus rolling stock Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amended section of the United States Code allows recipients of federal assistance to make advance payments for bus vehicles without requiring the manufacturer to have a performance bond. However, recipients must have a signed purchase order, authority to make a purchase before receiving a grant, meet other specific requirements, and cannot pay more than 20% of the total value upfront.