Overview

Title

To establish comprehensive, annual congressional budgeting.

ELI5 AI

The Comprehensive Congressional Budget Act of 2024 wants to make it easier for Congress to plan how the government spends money each year, but it doesn't explain what happens if they miss their deadlines or how to fix big money problems.

Summary AI

The bill, known as the Comprehensive Congressional Budget Act of 2024, aims to streamline and improve the congressional budgeting process by establishing an annual budget act that encompasses all federal spending and revenue. It finds that current budget practices result in unsustainable deficits and ineffective coordination among congressional committees. The bill proposes to eliminate the reconciliation process and replaces it with a requirement for all budget-related legislation to be completed and adopted by set deadlines. This change is intended to enhance Congressional involvement, improve budget management, and strengthen Congress's oversight capabilities.

Published

2024-01-11
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-01-11
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6953ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
17
Words:
4,123
Pages:
19
Sentences:
87

Language

Nouns: 1,157
Verbs: 302
Adjectives: 148
Adverbs: 25
Numbers: 291
Entities: 302

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.05
Average Sentence Length:
47.39
Token Entropy:
5.14
Readability (ARI):
24.66

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 6953, titled the "Comprehensive Congressional Budget Act of 2024," seeks to overhaul the congressional budgeting process. The proposed legislation focuses on the establishment of a comprehensive annual budget process, aiming to integrate spending and revenue policies and requiring multiple committees' contributions. It introduces a defined timetable for the budget process to ensure timely submission and approval of the federal budget. With the incorporation of both spending and revenue line items, this bill aims to enhance transparency and effectiveness in managing federal fiscal responsibilities.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill identifies and attempts to address several inefficiencies in the current budgeting process that contribute to growing federal deficits and debt. It outlines a timetable for the budgeting process but lacks enforcement measures in case deadlines are missed, which could lead to continued inefficiencies. Furthermore, the bill repeals the reconciliation process—an important legislative tool—without a clear explanation of the implications of this repeal. This raises concerns about how budget adjustments will be managed in the future.

Several sections of the bill use complex legal language and introduce new terms, such as the "annual budget Act," without sufficient context or definition. This could lead to ambiguity and interpretation challenges among lawmakers and the public. Additionally, parts of the bill make significant amendments without detailed explanations, potentially affecting the understanding and implementation of these changes.

Impact on the Public

The bill's potential impact on the general public could be significant, as it aims to create a more transparent and accountable budgeting process. A comprehensive annual budget could better align spending with national priorities, potentially leading to more prudent fiscal management. However, the lack of specified consequences for missed deadlines and the repeal of the reconciliation process may hinder effective implementation and lead to budget delays, ultimately affecting government services and the economy.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For government officials and lawmakers, the bill proposes a more structured and collaborative budgeting process, which could increase their involvement and oversight. However, the use of complex legal language and the introduction of undefined terms may present challenges in interpreting and enacting the legislation.

Committees responsible for preparing budget submissions may face increased workloads and scrutiny, as they will need to provide detailed projections and coordinate efforts under the proposed new framework. The requirement for line item submissions could ensure greater accountability but also demand additional resources and time.

The repeal of reconciliation could have both positive and negative impacts. On one hand, it might simplify the budgeting process by removing an often-complicated tool. On the other hand, it could also eliminate a mechanism that has historically helped manage immediate budget and deficit concerns, leading to potential disorder in fiscal adjustments.

Overall, H.R. 6953 presents an ambitious plan to reform the congressional budgeting process. While it addresses certain inefficiencies and promotes transparency, critical details need further clarification to ensure successful implementation and avoid unintended consequences for stakeholders and the general public.

Financial Assessment

In reviewing the Comprehensive Congressional Budget Act of 2024, it becomes apparent that financial references play a key role in understanding the bill's implications and objectives. The bill notably seeks to overhaul the congressional budgeting process, but its financial references highlight both the scope of current fiscal inefficiencies and the challenges in implementing the proposed measures.

Financial Allocations and Spending

One significant financial reference in the bill appears in Section 2, where it mentions that authorizing committees have failed to update authorizations for $461 billion in appropriations for fiscal year 2022. This underlines a critical issue of neglected fiscal management, as it implies that substantial government spending is occurring without contemporary oversight or formal legislative renewal. Such a lapse highlights the necessity for a revamped procedure to ensure that all financial commitments are accounted for and approved under updated legislative contexts.

Relation to Identified Issues

The bill's acknowledgement of $461 billion in unauthorized spending connects directly to one of the issues identified: the absence of specific measures within the bill to directly manage growing deficits and systemic inefficiencies. The large sum emphasizes the scale of the current problem and underscores the need for concrete financial strategies to address unsustainable fiscal practices. However, the bill stops short of detailing how to tackle these inefficiencies beyond establishing a new process, potentially leaving a gap in actionable fiscal policy reform.

Furthermore, this financial aspect ties into the broader reform objectives discussed in the bill's findings. With an emphasis on expanding congressional involvement, the bill aims to empower more comprehensive, collaborative budget management processes. The cited financial references serve to illustrate the urgency and necessity of such reforms but lack detailed strategies on how the legislative changes will rectify these financial oversight issues specifically.

Potential Implications

While the bill proposes to adopt an annual budget act and involve various committees in the process, there is an evident lack of clarity and specificity surrounding the handling of these large financial commitments. The sheer scale of unauthorized spending displayed in the reference of $461 billion acts as a critical context for understanding why reform is necessary, yet why further explanation and solution-oriented measures remain essential for the bill to achieve its intended outcomes.

Overall, the financial references within the Comprehensive Congressional Budget Act of 2024 paint a stark picture of current fiscal challenges that the bill seeks to address. However, without detailed solutions and clear implementation strategies, the full potential of rectifying these budgetary issues remains uncertain, leaving significant room for debate and potential modification as the legislative process unfolds.

Issues

  • The lack of specificity in Section 4 regarding consequences for missed deadlines could lead to ambiguity in legislative compliance, potentially impacting the effectiveness of the budget process and overall accountability in government spending.

  • In Section 2, the bill highlights that federal deficits and debt are growing at unsustainable rates and notes inefficiencies in the legislative process, but it does not propose specific measures or solutions to address these systemic financial issues.

  • Section 11 introduces a minor amendment to Section 312(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by adding the words 'commit or' before 'recommit'. However, the rationale for this change is unclear, and it lacks an explanation that could help stakeholders understand its necessity and impact.

  • The repeal of the reconciliation process in Section 10 raises significant questions regarding its impact on fiscal policy and management, yet the bill does not provide a summary explanation or rationale for the repeal, leaving its broader implications uncertain and potentially controversial.

  • Section 5 introduces complex legal language and terms, such as 'baseline levels', without clear definitions or clarification, leading to potential public and legislative misunderstanding of budget-related amendments.

  • Section 9 lacks clear deadlines or enforcement measures for the House's approval of the annual budget Act, which could result in delays or insufficiently considered budgets, affecting fiscal responsibility and transparency.

  • In Section 3, the introduction of the term 'annual budget Act' without adequate context or implications could lead to interpretation challenges and legislative discrepancies, especially considering the extensive cross-referencing required.

  • The technical language in Sections 6, 12, and 13 could reduce the accessibility and transparency of the bill, making it difficult for the general public and lawmakers to fully understand the amendments and their potential effects on budget management.

  • Section 14 makes adjustments to terms regarding limited tax benefits but does not provide enough clarity on how these changes might affect current tax policies or their alignment with intended fiscal outcomes, potentially leading to legal and political concerns.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act provides its official short title, allowing it to be referred to as the “Comprehensive Congressional Budget Act of 2024”.

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress finds that federal deficits and debt are growing at unsustainable rates, largely due to a fragmented budget process and lack of comprehensive review of spending and revenue policies. The President's unified budget proposal offers a more complete picture, while some states demonstrate effective budgeting with fewer bills, suggesting that a comprehensive budget could help Congress manage its fiscal responsibilities more effectively and involve more members in the process.

Money References

  • (10) Authorizing committees haven’t enacted updated authorizations for $461,000,000,000 of appropriations for fiscal year 2022.

3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 by adding a new definition for "annual budget Act," which refers to an Act detailing all federal budget authority and revenue. It also makes adjustments in related laws to replace references to appropriation measures with the term "annual budget Act."

4. Timetable Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a detailed timetable for the congressional budget process, specifying deadlines for various actions such as the President submitting the budget, committees reporting on budget resolutions, and completing budget actions, leading up to the beginning of the fiscal year on October 1.

300. Timetable Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the key deadlines in the congressional budget process for a fiscal year, starting with the President's budget submission in early February and ending with the beginning of the fiscal year on October 1. It includes specific dates for when various budget-related actions must be completed by Congress and its committees.

5. Annual adoption of concurrent resolution on the budget Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text describes amendments to the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, focusing on how the budget resolution is handled when not adopted by April 15. It outlines changes in the reporting responsibilities of the Budget Committees and requires the inclusion of additional budget details such as baseline spending projections and a line-item budget.

6. Committee allocations Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The changes to the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 require committees, except for the Committee on Appropriations, to prepare and submit projections of direct spending, revenues, and proposed legislative changes within their area of responsibility. These submissions must align with the overall budget plan or will be returned for revision. Additionally, various subsections are renumbered for consistency.

7. Concurrent resolution on the budget must be adopted before budget-related legislation is considered Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 303 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 requires that a concurrent resolution on the budget be adopted before any budget-related laws, specifically the annual budget Act and related amendments or reports, can be considered. It updates the language to refer specifically to the annual budget Act instead of general appropriation bills.

8. House committee action on the annual budget Act to be completed by June 10 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text amends the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require the House Committee on Appropriations to complete the annual budget act by June 10 each year. It mandates that the budget includes new budget authority and any changes suggested by relevant House committees. If a committee fails to provide input, the Appropriations Committee will include baseline items provided by the Budget Committee.

307. House committee action on the annual budget Act to be completed by June 10 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The House Committee on Appropriations must report the annual budget Act by June 10 each year, including budget authority details and any changes suggested by relevant committees. If any committee doesn't provide the necessary line items, the Appropriations Committee will use baseline items from the Budget Committee for those areas.

9. House approval of annual budget Act Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends rules to prevent the House of Representatives from taking a break of more than three days in July until they have approved the annual budget, ensuring it includes specific financial details and any proposed changes. It also assigns responsibility to the Chair of the Appropriations Committee to keep the Speaker informed about any changes in committee duties.

309. House approval of annual budget Act Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits the House of Representatives from taking a break longer than three days in July until they approve the annual budget, which outlines funding for various government programs and includes any proposed changes from relevant committees. The Chair of the Committee on Appropriations must keep the Speaker informed about any changes in the subcommittees' responsibilities.

10. Repeal of reconciliation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill repeals specific parts of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 related to reconciliation, such as sections 310 and 313. It also makes corresponding changes to other sections and related laws to align with this repeal, removing references to reconciliation processes and adjusting procedural rules accordingly.

11. Determinations and points of order Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill makes a change to the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by adding the words “commit or” right before the word “recommit” in one of its sections.

12. Analysis by Congressional Budget Office Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require each congressional committee to also include recommended spending or revenue changes in their submissions to the Appropriations Committee when preparing the annual budget.

13. Off-budget agencies, programs, and activities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 13 updates the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by removing the phrasing that excludes the activities related to certain trust funds from the budget analysis done before the law was passed.

14. Identification of limited tax benefits Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act by changing the language from "revenue or reconciliation bill or joint resolution" to "revenue bill or annual budget Act" wherever it appears, affecting how limited tax benefits are identified.