Overview
Title
To lower the cost of postsecondary education for students and families.
ELI5 AI
The College Cost Reduction Act is a plan to make college less expensive for students and their families by clear up how financial aid works, setting limits on loans, and making sure colleges help students finish school and pay back their loans.
Summary AI
The College Cost Reduction Act, introduced in the House of Representatives, aims to make postsecondary education more affordable for students and their families. The bill proposes measures to increase transparency in financial aid offers, redefines aid calculation and limits, and introduces risk-sharing requirements for institutions. It seeks to enhance accountability in student success, streamline accreditation processes, and encourages the use of evidence-based reforms to support high-need students. Additionally, it aims to improve transfer policies to ensure fair assessment of credits between institutions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The College Cost Reduction Act aims to address postsecondary education costs by introducing a range of measures focused on transparency, access to financial aid, student success, and accountability for institutions. Central to the bill are provisions intended to simplify and standardize how financial aid information is presented to students, establish new grant programs, and modify existing financial aid rules.
General Summary
The bill mandates a standardized financial aid offer form that all colleges and universities must use when providing aid information to students. This form is designed to present costs, loans, grants, and scholarships clearly, making it easier for students and families to understand their financial commitments. Additionally, the bill places a cap on Federal Pell Grants based on the median cost of college programs and introduces a Pell Plus program to further assist students financially. There are significant changes in how student loans are managed, including setting loan limits based on the median cost of college and eliminating origination fees. Moreover, the bill outlines performance-based grants and imposes financial accountability measures on institutions through risk-sharing arrangements.
Significant Issues
One of the major concerns with this bill is the potential administrative burden that the standardized financial aid offer form could impose on educational institutions, particularly smaller ones with fewer resources. Compliance with these new requirements might require additional staffing or financial resources, which could be challenging for some schools.
The elimination of origination fees represents a reduction in government revenue, which could impact funding for future education programs. While this change is intended to ease financial burdens on students, it may necessitate adjustments in the federal budget or cuts to existing programs to offset the lost revenue.
Another critical issue is the introduction of risk-sharing payments. By tying institutional payments to student loan repayment outcomes, colleges may face significant financial liabilities. This could disproportionately affect institutions serving low-income or high-risk students, possibly leading these schools to limit enrollments to students perceived as less risky.
The restrictions on regulatory actions imposed on the Secretary of Education could impede the government's ability to adapt to evolving educational challenges. This might lead to delayed implementation of necessary policy changes or regulatory adaptations.
Broad Impact on the Public
If enacted, the bill could lead to greater transparency and lower costs for students and their families, making it easier to navigate financial aid options. By clearly defining and limiting loan amounts based on the median cost of college, the bill aims to prevent students from incurring excessive debt. However, changes in funding and regulatory oversight could have mixed effects, potentially limiting government flexibility to address future issues promptly.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Educational Institutions: Larger colleges might have the resources to adapt to these changes more easily, but smaller institutions could struggle with the additional administrative burden, potentially impacting their ability to deliver educational services.
Students and Families: The bill's focus on clarity and standardization in financial aid could benefit students by reducing confusion and helping them make more informed financial decisions. However, students from higher-cost or specialized programs might find their financial aid limited, impacting their ability to afford education.
Government and Policymakers: While reduced regulatory authority might streamline certain processes, it could also limit the federal government's ability to ensure educational standards and accountability, potentially leading to flaws in how regulations are enacted and adjusted in response to evolving needs.
Overall, the College Cost Reduction Act seeks to make college more affordable, albeit with potential challenges for implementation and unintended consequences for various educational stakeholders.
Financial Assessment
The College Cost Reduction Act includes several significant financial components aimed at reducing postsecondary education costs for students and families. The bill proposes measures for financial aid transparency, risk-sharing by institutions, changes to loan limits, and new grant authorizations.
Financial Aid Offers
The bill mandates standardized financial aid offers, which might impose additional administrative burdens on colleges, particularly smaller ones with limited resources. By requiring institutions to conform to these standardized forms, the bill seeks to ensure consistency while also providing clarity to families about educational costs. However, this could limit institutions’ ability to tailor these communications based on their unique student populations, potentially affecting how individual student needs are addressed.
Financial Allocations and Grants
Several financial allocations are highlighted in the bill. For example, there is a provision for PROMISE grants, which aim to incentivize institutions to guarantee a maximum total price for student programs of study. The maximum grant amount is set to not exceed the product of the average number of students receiving federal aid in the last three years multiplied by $5,000. Moreover, the bill authorizes an additional $2 billion annually for ten years, starting fiscal year 2026, to cover any insufficiencies in funding PROMISE grants. This large sum reflects a significant commitment to promoting educational affordability and incentivizing institutions to develop and adhere to cost limits.
The Postsecondary Student Success Grants section authorizes $45 million for each fiscal year from 2026 through 2031. These grants aim to provide support services to improve graduation rates among high-need students. The criteria used to define these high-need students and allocate funds could, however, lead to interpretations that impact fair distribution.
Loan Limits and Borrower Protections
Changes to loan limits could impact students significantly. For instance, the bill sets the maximum aggregate amount for Federal Direct Stafford Loans and Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loans for undergraduate students at $50,000 with professional students capped at $150,000. The introduction of these limits seeks to prevent borrowers from excessive debt but could also restrict access to higher-cost programs or institutions, particularly in high-cost areas. This highlights a potential issue wherein students might face barriers to accessing certain educational opportunities due to funding caps relative to cost.
Regulatory and Financial Liability for Institutions
Another financial aspect involves institutions remitting risk-sharing payments to the Secretary, calculated on student loan repayment outcomes. This mechanism holds institutions financially accountable for their graduates’ loan repayments. While intended to encourage accountability and financial health of graduates, it could impose significant financial liabilities on colleges, especially those serving low-income or high-risk student populations.
Additionally, the repeal of origination fees, which historically have provided revenue through the student loan process, could reduce federal funding for education programs (up to $100 million annually). This reduction would necessitate adjustments in budgeting and might lead to cuts in existing educational resources or services.
In summary, while the College Cost Reduction Act presents numerous initiatives aimed at reducing the financial burden of postsecondary education, its implications for both institutions and students are nuanced, particularly concerning administrative capacity, funding availability, and equitable access to educational resources across different socio-economic groups.
Issues
The bill introduces significant changes to financial aid offers, including standardized forms and mandatory use by institutions (Sections 111, 124). This may create challenges for institutions lacking resources to comply and increase administrative burdens, particularly for smaller colleges.
The proposed nationwide standardized financial aid offer form (Sections 111, 124) may restrict colleges' ability to tailor communications to unique student populations and could affect how institutions address individual student needs.
The elimination of certain federal regulations related to financial responsibility, gainful employment, and borrower protections (Section 302) may lead to reduced accountability mechanisms for institutions and potentially increase risks for students and taxpayers.
Changes to loan limits, including the use of median cost of college to set loan amounts, could disproportionately affect students in high-cost areas or programs with higher expenses, leading to potential access and affordability issues (Section 221).
The bill's measures to establish risk-sharing payments and penalties for institutions based on student loan repayment outcomes (Section 301) could impose significant financial liabilities on colleges, particularly those serving low-income or high-risk student populations.
The repeal of origination fees may reduce revenue from student loans, impacting federal funding for education programs (Section 225), potentially necessitating budget adjustments or cuts to existing programs.
Ambiguities in definitions and unaddressed aspects in the transfer of credits between institutions (Sections 323, 322) may create inconsistencies and challenges for students seeking to transfer credits, potentially affecting students' educational trajectories and costs.
The limitations placed on the Secretary of Education's ability to propose regulations (Sections 303, 492A) might hinder timely responses to emerging educational challenges or shifts in policy needs, affecting federal oversight capabilities.
The criteria for determining what constitutes 'high-need students' and how grants are evaluated could lead to ambiguities and potential inequities in the distribution of funding and resources (Section 321).
The definition of 'secure and privacy-protected' in the postsecondary student data system section is repeated frequently but lacks explicit detail, potentially leading to varied interpretations of privacy standards (Section 113).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines the structure of the "College Cost Reduction Act," including its short title and the organization of its contents into several titles and sections. These sections cover topics like increasing transparency about college costs, improving access to financial aid, ensuring accountability, supporting student success, and managing departmental regulations and loan programs.
2. References Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that unless stated otherwise, any amendments or repeals mentioned in the Act refer to changes made to sections or other parts of the Higher Education Act of 1965.
101. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill provides definitions for terms related to higher education programs, such as CIP code, which identifies a field of study; credential level, which indicates the level of degree awarded; program of study, which is the course leading to a credential; program length, referring to the duration required for completion; time to credential, the actual time taken by a student to earn a credential; and value-added earnings, which are calculated earnings of a student after adjusting for poverty line deductions and geographic cost differences.
111. Financial aid offers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines requirements for creating a standardized financial aid offer form for colleges, developed by the Secretary of Education with input from relevant groups. This form must clearly list cost information, grants, scholarships, and loans in a simple manner, ensuring transparency for students about their financial commitments and available aid while using a consistent format across all institutions receiving federal aid.
484. Institution financial aid offer form Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the development of a standardized financial aid offer form for students by the Secretary of Education, including clear and standardized terminology, information on costs, grants, scholarships, loans, and work-study opportunities. It outlines requirements for content, formatting, and testing to ensure the form is consumer-friendly, easy to understand, and helps students and families better comprehend college costs and financial aid eligibility.
124. Use of mandatory financial aid offer and terms Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Each college or university that receives federal financial aid must use a specific financial aid offer form and terms set by the Secretary of Education for all students applying for aid. These requirements become effective when the new FAFSA form is released, as long as it is at least one year after the finalization of the standards, but no regulations will be set to enforce this.
112. College scorecard website Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 to create a College Scorecard website that provides comprehensive information on colleges and their programs, such as financial aid, student debt, and earnings. It requires the information to be regularly updated and made easily accessible and comparable for students and families, ensuring privacy is maintained.
Money References
- “(H) Information on college costs and financial aid, including average, median, minimum, and maximum values of— “(i) the cost of attendance, including such cost disaggregated by the costs described in paragraphs (1) through (14) of section 472(a); “(ii) the grants and scholarships received by students at the institution and the number and percentage of such students receiving such grants and scholarships, disaggregated by source and whether such aid is need-based, merit-based, an athletic scholarship, or other type of grant or scholarship; and “(iii) the total net price required for completion for students who received Federal financial assistance described in paragraph (2)(I). “(I) Information on student debt and repayment, including— “(i) the average, median, minimum, and maximum amounts borrowed by students under title IV; and “(ii) information with respect to repayment of loans made under title IV, including borrower-based repayment rates, dollar-based repayment rates, and time spent in repayment. “(J) Information on the earnings of students who received Federal financial assistance described in paragraph (2)(I), including the average, median, minimum, and maximum values of— “(i) with respect to students who complete a program of study in an award year— “(I) the annual earnings of such students; and “(II) the value-added earnings of such students; and “(ii) with respect to students who do not complete a program of study in an award year, the annual earnings of such students.
113. Postsecondary student data system Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Higher Education Act to establish a secure system that collects and analyzes data about college students to improve transparency and support decision-making by students and families. It outlines privacy protections, the types of data collected, guidelines for sharing information with other federal agencies, and restrictions on the use of the data.
114. Database of student information prohibited Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits the creation of a student information database, but allows exceptions for certain existing systems that support specific educational programs and are necessary for their operation. It also updates rules for schools to submit certain data and aims to ease data reporting burdens for those using the education data system.
201. Amount of need; cost of attendance; median cost of college Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill modifies the calculation of financial need for college students, stating that for the 2024–2025 school year, a student's cost of attendance is used, and from 2025–2026 onward, it shifts to the median cost of the student's program across all colleges. Additionally, it clarifies how the cost of attendance and median cost of college are determined for educational programs offered by institutions.
472A. Determination of median cost of college Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that the "median cost of college" refers to the middle value of the costs students pay to attend a program at colleges or universities, calculated from the previous year for that program.
211. Federal Pell Grant program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Federal Pell Grant program sets a maximum award limit that cannot exceed the median cost of college for a student's program. It introduces a Pell Plus program, allowing eligible students to receive an additional grant equal to their initial Pell Grant, provided the combined amount does not surpass the median cost. The bill also requires participating institutions to offer a price guarantee on tuition, ensuring costs do not exceed the expected earnings from the program. The changes apply from the 2025–2026 award year onward.
212. Campus-based aid programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines changes to campus-based aid programs, terminating certain programs like the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants after 2026, and introducing PROMISE grants, which are performance-based grants awarded to eligible institutions to promote affordability, access, and success in postsecondary education. PROMISE grants require institutions to meet specific criteria, such as providing a guaranteed maximum total price for completion for students, and the funds must be used for activities that improve affordability, access, student success, and evaluation of these activities.
Money References
- — “(1) FORMULA.—Subject to subsection (b), the amount of a PROMISE grant for an eligible institution for each year of the grant period shall be determined by the Secretary annually and shall be the amount determined by multiplying— “(A) the lesser of— “(i) the difference determined by subtracting one from the quotient of— “(I) the average, for the 3 most recent award years for which data are available, of the median value-added earnings (as defined in section 103) for each such award year of students who completed any program of study of the institution; divided by “(II) the average for the 3 most recent award years, of the maximum total price applicable for each such award year to students enrolled in the institution in any program of study who received financial aid under this title; or “(ii) the number two; “(B) the average, for the 3 most recent award years, of the total dollar amount of Federal Pell Grants (excluding Pell Plus Grants awarded under section 401(k)) awarded to students enrolled in the institution in each such award year; and “(C) the average, for the 3 most recent award years, of the percentage of low-income students who received Federal financial assistance under this title who were enrolled in the institution in each such award year who— “(i) completed a program of study at the institution within 100 percent of the program length of such program; or “(ii) only in the case of a two-year institution or a less than two-year institution— “(I) transfer to a four-year institution; and “(II) within 4 years after first enrolling at the two-year or less than two-year institution, complete a program of study at the four-year institution for which a bachelor’s degree (or substantially similar credential) is awarded.
- “(b) Maximum grant amount.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the maximum amount an eligible institution may receive annually for a grant under this subpart shall be the amount equal to— “(1) the average, for the 3 most recent award years, of the number of students enrolled in the institution in an award year who receive Federal financial aid under this title; multiplied by “(2) $5,000.
- “(b) Secondary authorization.—In addition to the amounts available to the Secretary under subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, for fiscal year 2026 and each of the 9 succeeding fiscal years, $2,000,000,000, to carry out this subpart in any award year for which the amounts available under subsection (a) are insufficient to fully fund the PROMISE grants awarded under this subpart in such award year
415A. Purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The purpose of this section is to offer grants based on performance to help institutions give clear information about college costs to students and families, improve access to higher education and economic opportunities, and make sure everyone benefits financially from investments in education.
415B. Promise grants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The government will start awarding PROMISE grants from the 2026-2027 school year to support certain institutions. These grants are based on performance and last for six years, with funding determined by specific rules.
415C. Eligible institutions; application Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
To be eligible for a PROMISE grant, a college must adhere to price guarantee rules, ensuring transparency about the maximum total cost for students in different income categories. They must also provide detailed plans on using the grant for enhancing college affordability, access, and student success, while evaluating and sharing effective practices.
415D. Grant amounts; flexible use of funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the formula for determining the amount of a PROMISE grant that colleges can receive each year, based on several factors including students' earnings, Federal Pell Grants, and the college's percentage of low-income students. It also states the maximum grant an institution can receive annually, which is tied to the number of students receiving federal aid, and allows colleges to use the grants flexibly for activities that improve affordability, access, and student success.
Money References
- (a) Grant amount formula.— (1) FORMULA.—Subject to subsection (b), the amount of a PROMISE grant for an eligible institution for each year of the grant period shall be determined by the Secretary annually and shall be the amount determined by multiplying— (A) the lesser of— (i) the difference determined by subtracting one from the quotient of— (I) the average, for the 3 most recent award years for which data are available, of the median value-added earnings (as defined in section 103) for each such award year of students who completed any program of study of the institution; divided by (II) the average for the 3 most recent award years, of the maximum total price applicable for each such award year to students enrolled in the institution in any program of study who received financial aid under this title; or (ii) the number two; (B) the average, for the 3 most recent award years, of the total dollar amount of Federal Pell Grants (excluding Pell Plus Grants awarded under section 401(k)) awarded to students enrolled in the institution in each such award year; and (C) the average, for the 3 most recent award years, of the percentage of low-income students who received Federal financial assistance under this title who were enrolled in the institution in each such award year who— (i) completed a program of study at the institution within 100 percent of the program length of such program; or (ii) only in the case of a two-year institution or a less than two-year institution— (I) transfer to a four-year institution; and (II) within 4 years after first enrolling at the two-year or less than two-year institution, complete a program of study at the four-year institution for which a bachelor’s degree (or substantially similar credential) is awarded. (2) DEFINITION OF LOW-INCOME.—In this section, the term “low-income”, when used with respect to a student, means that the student’s family income does not exceed the maximum income in the lowest income category described in section 132(c)(2)(A)(i).
- (b) Maximum grant amount.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the maximum amount an eligible institution may receive annually for a grant under this subpart shall be the amount equal to— (1) the average, for the 3 most recent award years, of the number of students enrolled in the institution in an award year who receive Federal financial aid under this title; multiplied by (2) $5,000. (c) Flexible use of funds.—A
415E. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill authorizes the use of specific funds remitted as risk-sharing payments and additional appropriations that total $2 billion for the next ten years to support grants under this subpart. If there are not enough funds, the grants will prioritize institutions with the highest percentage of low-income students.
Money References
- (b) Secondary authorization.—In addition to the amounts available to the Secretary under subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, for fiscal year 2026 and each of the 9 succeeding fiscal years, $2,000,000,000, to carry out this subpart in any award year for which the amounts available under subsection (a) are insufficient to fully fund the PROMISE grants awarded under this subpart in such award year.
221. Loan limits Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines changes to loan limits for Stafford loans. Starting July 1, 2025, graduate and professional students will have new annual and total borrowing limits based on the median cost of college. There are exceptions for students already enrolled before this date. Additionally, new limits are set for undergraduate borrowers, with special conditions for students in certain programs, and institutions can adjust borrowing amounts based on certain financial criteria. Furthermore, Federal Direct PLUS loans to parents and graduate students will be discontinued after this date.
Money References
- “(D) AGGREGATE LIMITS.—Notwithstanding any provision of this part or part B, for any period of instruction beginning on or after July 1, 2025, the maximum aggregate amount of Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford loans that— “(i) a graduate student may borrow shall be $100,000; and “(ii) a professional student may borrow shall be $150,000.
- “(ii) AGGREGATE LIMITS.—Notwithstanding any provision of this part or part B, for any period of instruction beginning on or after July 1, 2025, with respect to an undergraduate student— “(I) the maximum aggregate amount of Federal Direct Stafford loans and Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford loans that may be borrowed shall be $50,000; “(II) the maximum aggregate amount of Federal Direct Stafford loans that may be borrowed shall be $23,000; and “(III) the maximum aggregate amount of Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford loans that may be borrowed shall be $50,000. “
- “(ii) QUALIFYING UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM DEFINED.—For purposes of this subparagraph, the term ‘qualifying undergraduate program’ means a program of study— “(I) for which the total tuition and fees (including the required costs described in section 484(b)(3)(A)(i)(I)) exceeds the aggregate limits for undergraduate students described in subparagraph (A)(ii); “(II) that meets certification requirements of the Federal agency that directly regulates the program and provides final licensing and credentials to students upon completion; and “(III) that has had, for the previous three award years— “(aa) a verified completion rate of at least 70 percent, within 150 percent of the program length of such program of study; and “(bb) a verified job placement rate of at least 70 percent, measured 180 days after completion. “(C) ALL STUDENTS.—The maximum aggregate amount of loans made, insured, or guaranteed under this title to a student shall be $200,000.”.
222. Loan repayment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill outlines changes to the repayment plans for loans under the Higher Education Act of 1965, starting July 1, 2024, offering borrowers either a standard 10-year repayment plan or a repayment assistance plan. It also describes guidelines for borrowers who default, allows for repayment plan changes, and introduces a repayment assistance plan that caps monthly payments based on income and family size, with provisions for interest and principal subsidies for distressed borrowers.
223. Loan rehabilitation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section changes the Higher Education Act of 1965, allowing certain loans to be rehabilitated up to two times instead of just once.
224. Interest capitalization Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines changes to the Higher Education Act regarding interest capitalization on student loans. These changes ensure that interest on certain loans, like Federal PLUS and Income-Contingent Repayment loans, cannot be capitalized, meaning it can no longer be added to the principal balance, ultimately helping to limit the growth of overall loan debt.
225. Origination fees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill repeals the origination fees for certain federal student loans. The change will apply to loans first disbursed, or applications for Federal Direct Consolidation Loans received, on or after July 1, 2024.
301. Agreements with institutions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amended section of the Higher Education Act of 1965 introduces a requirement for colleges to make annual risk-sharing payments to the Secretary of Education, starting in the 2024-2025 award year. These payments are based on the performance of defined student cohorts, and penalties for late or missed payments include losing the ability to issue student loans or participate in federal aid programs.
302. Regulatory relief Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill outlines the repeal of various education regulations related to the 90/10 rule, financial value transparency, gainful employment, and changes in ownership of educational institutions. It also details amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965, including conditions for institution ownership changes, applications for conversion, incentive compensation rules, and criteria for financial responsibility, while establishing procedures for program reviews and imposing limits on fees for certain applications.
Money References
- “(D) In no case may any fee remitted under subparagraph (A) or (B) exceed $120,000 for any transaction (or pretransaction) application, nor may the Secretary require an institution that has paid a fee under subparagraph (B) to pay an additional fee under subparagraph (A).
- (C) An institution may not be subject to an annual fee under subparagraph (B) for monitoring related to a conversion that exceeds $60,000.
303. Limitation on authority of Secretary to propose or issue regulations and executive actions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section limits the U.S. Secretary of Education's power to make new rules or take executive actions that are economically significant and would increase subsidy costs. It ensures such actions undergo additional cost analysis and defines "economically significant" as impacting the economy by $100 million or more annually or affecting jobs, competition, health, or government operations in a significant way.
Money References
- “(d) Definition.—In this section, the term ‘economically significant’, when used with respect to a draft, proposed, or final regulation or executive action, means that the regulation or executive action is likely, as determined by the Secretary— “(1) to have an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; or “(2) adversely to affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities.”.
492A. Limitation on authority of the Secretary to propose or issue regulations and executive actions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section restricts the Secretary from proposing or issuing new regulations or executive actions that are considered economically significant and would increase subsidy costs. It also requires additional cost analyses for such regulations, and defines "economically significant" as having a major economic impact or negatively affecting vital sectors like public health or the environment.
Money References
- (d) Definition.—In this section, the term “economically significant”, when used with respect to a draft, proposed, or final regulation or executive action, means that the regulation or executive action is likely, as determined by the Secretary— (1) to have an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; or (2) adversely to affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities.
304. Office of Federal Student Aid Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses federal preemption for certain activities related to federal student loans, meaning state laws cannot impose additional requirements on how these loans are disclosed, communicated, serviced, or collected. It also specifies that student loan servicers must receive written guidance in certain forms before any new responsibilities or changes to their contracts take effect, ensuring they are not bound by informal notifications.
311. Accrediting agency recognition Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section updates the rules for recognizing accrediting agencies under the Higher Education Act, ensuring they have the ability to operate independently and maintain standards that respect the religious missions of institutions while avoiding endorsement of specific ideologies. It also introduces new criteria for measuring student outcomes, allows states to designate accrediting bodies, and requires more public disclosure about accredited institutions, among other changes.
312. National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI) Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to Section 114 focus on modifying the structure and rules of the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI). Key changes include updating the qualifications for committee members to prevent conflicts of interest, simplifying meeting agenda requirements, and extending the committee's authorization through September 30, 2028.
313. Alternative quality assurance experimental site initiative Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text describes an initiative under the Higher Education Act that allows select educational entities to participate in a five-year experiment testing whether they can maintain high student achievement without official accreditation. The Secretary of Education will provide waivers to these entities, and select participants will be required to share financial risk and demonstrate potential cost savings.
321. Postsecondary student success grants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text describes amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965, introducing competitive grants for eligible institutions and partnerships aimed at improving student success, particularly for high-need students. The amendments outline the definitions, conditions for grant applications, required and permissible uses of funds, and evaluation criteria, along with reserving funds for eligible Indian entities and setting specific grant and funding limits.
Money References
- “(4) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection, $45,000,000, for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2031.”; and (2) by striking sections 742 through 745. ---
322. Reverse Transfer Efficiency Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Reverse Transfer Efficiency Act amends the General Education Provisions Act to allow colleges and universities to receive a student's course records from other institutions. This helps the student complete their degree or certificate if they give written consent.
323. Transparent and fair transfer of credit policies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Higher Education Act ensures that colleges cannot refuse to transfer a student’s credits just because the original institution is accredited by a different recognized agency. It requires fair policies regarding credit transfers between institutions of higher education.