Overview

Title

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit fleeing law enforcement officers enforcing immigration laws, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 6941 is a bill that makes it against the law to run away from police officers who are checking for immigration rules, and if someone does, they could go to jail for a few years, especially if they are driving and speeding.

Summary AI

H.R. 6941 aims to change United States law by making it illegal to flee from law enforcement officers who are enforcing immigration laws. The bill specifies penalties for those who evade officers or checkpoints, including up to five years in prison, or up to eight years if the evasion involves speeding in a vehicle. This legislation intends to deter individuals from running away when approached by immigration officials.

Published

2024-01-10
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-01-10
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6941ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
470
Pages:
2
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 155
Verbs: 37
Adjectives: 11
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 30
Entities: 51

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.90
Average Sentence Length:
47.00
Token Entropy:
4.58
Readability (ARI):
23.69

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, "Criminalize Fleeing from Immigration Enforcement Act of 2024", aims to amend existing U.S. law by establishing penalties for individuals who attempt to evade law enforcement officers specifically involved in immigration law enforcement. Introduced in the House of Representatives, the bill sets out consequences for fleeing from enforcement officers or checkpoints, including fines and imprisonment. It particularly increases penalties when such evasion involves a motor vehicle exceeding speed limits.

General Summary of the Bill

This legislative proposal seeks to enhance the enforcement of immigration laws by imposing stricter penalties on individuals who flee from law enforcement officers engaged in immigration-related duties. The bill proposes fines and imprisonment for up to five years for general evasion, and up to eight years if the act involves fleeing in a vehicle over the speed limit. This is intended to deter individuals from attempting to evade such authorities and improve compliance with immigration laws.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several significant issues are associated with this bill. Firstly, the legislation does not specify the detailed penalties for fleeing or evading enforcement, leading to potential ambiguities during enforcement and prosecution. This absence of clarity might cause inconsistencies in how the law is applied across different jurisdictions.

Secondly, the language used to define "fleeing" or "evading" is not very clear, which could lead to varied interpretations by law enforcement officers and the courts. Such ambiguity might result in legal disputes and challenges regarding the application of the law.

Additionally, there is a lack of provisions concerning the due process or rights of individuals in these situations, which could potentially infringe on civil liberties and ensure fair treatment. Lastly, the bill's reference to specific sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act could be confusing for those not familiar with immigration law, hindering the general public's understanding.

Potential Impacts on the Public

The broader impact of this bill on the public could be mixed. On one hand, it might enhance the enforcement of immigration laws and strengthen border security by discouraging attempts to evade authorities. It could improve compliance among those subject to immigration laws, consequently reducing illegal immigration.

On the other hand, due to the issues noted, such as the lack of clarity in the definition of fleeing or evading and the absence of a clear framework for penalties, individuals may face unfair enforcement actions. The ambiguity could lead to a perception of injustice or unequal treatment if the law is implemented inconsistently across different areas.

Impacts on Specific Stakeholders

For law enforcement agencies, the bill provides them with a legal framework to take action against those evading immigration enforcement, potentially making their work more straightforward. However, it also places the onus on them to interpret what constitutes "fleeing" or "evading", possibly leading to challenges in consistent application without clearer guidelines.

Immigrant communities may feel adversely impacted by this bill, experiencing heightened risks of legal action during immigration enforcement operations. This could lead to increased fear and mistrust among communities who feel they may be unfairly targeted.

Legal professionals and civil rights advocates may raise concerns about the civil liberties implications of the bill, particularly regarding due process and the potential for legal challenges due to its ambiguous language. This could lead to calls for greater clarity and protections within the legislative framework.

Overall, while the bill aims to strengthen immigration law enforcement, its success and fairness largely depend on clarifying its provisions and ensuring that due process and civil rights are adequately protected.

Issues

  • The bill does not specify the penalties for fleeing or evading enforcement, which may lead to ambiguity in enforcement and prosecution. This is particularly concerning as it could result in inconsistent application of the law across different jurisdictions. (Section 758)

  • The section does not clearly define what constitutes 'fleeing' or 'evading', which could lead to varied interpretations by law enforcement and courts, potentially resulting in legal disputes and challenges. (Section 758)

  • There is no mention of due process or rights of individuals in these situations, raising concerns about potential violations of civil liberties and fair treatment under the law. (Section 758)

  • The references to specific sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act might be unclear to readers unfamiliar with that Act, impeding the general public's understanding of the legal implications. (Section 2)

  • The penalty clause distinguishes between general evasion and evasion involving motor vehicles but does not provide guidance for assessing cases where the legal speed limit differs across jurisdictions, which could result in inconsistent enforcement. (Section 758)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes that the official short title of the act is the "Criminalize Fleeing from Immigration Enforcement Act of 2024."

2. Fleeing enforcement of immigration laws Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends U.S. law to increase penalties for individuals who flee or evade law enforcement officers during the enforcement of certain immigration laws. It stipulates fines and imprisonment of up to five years, or up to eight years if the evasion occurs in a speeding vehicle.

758. Fleeing enforcement of immigration laws Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Anyone who tries to run away from federal, state, or local law enforcement officers who are enforcing certain immigration laws, or who evades a checkpoint run by immigration officials or other federal agents, can be penalized under this section of the law.