Overview
Title
To require heads of executive agencies to, upon request, submit to relevant congressional committees information regarding the furlough or indefinite suspension without pay of employees of such executive agencies, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure that if an important government worker loses their job or is not paid, the leaders have to tell Congress why it happened, unless it's because there isn't enough money or the law demands it. This helps the government be open and honest.
Summary AI
H. R. 6911 is a bill that requires the heads of executive agencies to provide information to congressional committees, upon request, about why an employee has been furloughed or suspended indefinitely without pay. The bill mandates that these explanations be submitted within 15 days and should include all relevant information and evidence, unless the furlough or suspension stems from specific statutory actions or lack of funding. The aim is to ensure transparency and accountability within the executive branch, reinforcing Congress's oversight role. However, it exempts cases where employees are furloughed due to specific legal actions or budget lapses.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 6911, introduced in the House of Representatives, is designed to bolster transparency between the executive agencies of the U.S. government and congressional committees. The legislation mandates that heads of executive agencies provide, upon request, an explanation to relevant congressional committees regarding the furlough or indefinite suspension without pay of their employees. This requirement seeks to improve oversight by ensuring Congress can obtain necessary information. The act is dubbed the "ROBERT MALLEY Act" from its more extensive official title.
Summary of Significant Issues
One primary concern with this bill relates to its title and abbreviation. The fully extended name, "Requiring Officials and Bureaucrats to Expeditiously Relinquish Testimony and Meaningful Answers about Lawbreaking and Locked out Employees Yesterday Act," is notably complex and potentially confusing. Furthermore, the abbreviation "ROBERT MALLEY Act" seems an unusual fit for the content of the bill, possibly leading to misunderstandings or diminishing the perceived seriousness of the legislation.
The second section, "Sense of Congress," outlines broad principles advocating for government transparency and accountability, especially concerning conspiracy or employment related to terrorist organizations. However, this section lacks specific legal directives, making it susceptible to varied interpretations regarding enforcement and applicability.
The requirement for explanations from agency heads is another crucial component. While designed to ensure transparency, the stipulation that explanations be unclassified yet possibly accompanied by a classified annex might result in incomplete transparency if too much critical information is relegated to classified status. Additionally, the process for managing instances where explanations involve sensitive or personal data is not adequately defined.
Public Impact
The passage of this bill could bolster public trust in governmental processes by ensuring greater transparency and legislative oversight over executive actions, particularly in cases of furloughs or suspensions of federal employees. By requiring transparent explanations, the public can have more confidence that such actions are carried out fairly and justly.
Impact on Stakeholders
Congressional Committees: The bill empowers congressional committees to perform their oversight functions more effectively by guaranteeing access to essential information. However, ambiguity around which committee holds jurisdiction in some circumstances may lead to potential conflicts or delays.
Executive Agencies: Heads of executive agencies may face increased administrative burdens due to the obligation to provide detailed explanations quickly (within 15 days). They might also encounter challenges in balancing transparency with the confidentiality of certain information.
Federal Employees: Employees affected by furloughs or indefinite suspensions may benefit from heightened scrutiny over such actions, potentially leading to fairer treatment and ensuring decisions are justified.
General Public: The bill's emphasis on transparency aligns with public interest in open government operations, though its effectiveness in practice would depend on how well it addresses issues like classification of information and clarity in legislative intent. The general public may view the bill positively if it delivers on its promises of accountability and transparency.
Issues
The full title 'Requiring Officials and Bureaucrats to Expeditiously Relinquish Testimony and Meaningful Answers about Lawbreaking and Locked out Employees Yesterday Act' is overly complex and difficult to understand, which could lead to confusion or be perceived as lacking seriousness (Section 1).
The abbreviation 'ROBERT MALLEY Act' formed from the full title is unusual and could lead to unnecessary confusion or ambiguity (Section 1).
The section on 'Sense of Congress' outlines general principles but lacks specific actions or consequences, leading to potential ambiguity in enforcement and understanding (Section 2).
The phrase 'individuals that conspire with State Sponsors of Terror or foreign terrorist organizations' might be vague due to a lack of clear legal definition or criteria for 'conspire' (Section 2).
The broad statement 'to the fullest extent of the law' in the 'Sense of Congress' section lacks specificity, potentially leading to interpretation issues regarding the application of justice (Section 2).
The term 'appropriate congressional committees' is well-defined, but there could be potential for confusion or conflict if committees disagree on which holds jurisdiction over a particular executive agency (Section 3).
The requirement for explanations to be unclassified, with a provision for a classified annex, may lead to incomplete transparency, especially if excessive information is included in the classified annex (Section 3).
There is a lack of clarity on the procedure to handle situations where explanations involve sensitive personal data or ongoing investigations, potentially impacting the oversight process (Section 3).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The act is officially named as the "Requiring Officials and Bureaucrats to Expeditiously Relinquish Testimony and Meaningful Answers about Lawbreaking and Locked out Employees Yesterday Act," or more simply, the "ROBERT MALLEY Act."
2. Sense of Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section expresses that Congress believes the U.S. government must be open with the public and lawmakers, the executive branch should not hinder Congress's ability to investigate, individuals working with terrorist groups must be punished, and hiring spies for foreign countries is considered treason.
3. Furlough and indefinite suspension explanations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the head of an executive agency to explain why an employee was furloughed or indefinitely suspended without pay within 15 days of a request from certain congressional committee leaders, excluding cases related to specific actions or budget issues. The explanation must be unclassified, though it can have a classified addendum, and it defines which congressional committees and what constitutes an executive agency.