Overview
Title
To direct the Department of Defense to report to Congress on the efforts of the Department to coordinate with the defense industrial base for purposes of countering certain capabilities of the People’s Liberation of Army.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 6902 wants the Department of Defense to tell Congress how they're working with companies that build military stuff to stop some things the Chinese army is doing, especially in computer and space stuff, by the end of March 2024. They'll talk about what's happening now, how they can share information and practice together better, and what they might need to get stronger.
Summary AI
H. R. 6902 requires the Department of Defense to submit a report to Congress by March 30, 2024, detailing how it is working with the defense industrial base to counter certain military capabilities of China's People’s Liberation Army, particularly focusing on areas like cyber and space. The report must describe current efforts, outline a plan for better coordination including exercises and information sharing, and provide feedback on the impact of potential conflicts on the defense industry and how to improve defense capabilities.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, H.R. 6902, aims to direct the United States Department of Defense to enhance its collaboration with the defense industrial base to counter certain capabilities of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Specifically, the focus is on improving coordination in areas such as command, control, communications, computers, cyber, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, collectively known as C5ISR. By March 2024, the Department is tasked with delivering a comprehensive report to Congress that outlines its efforts and strategies in these realms.
General Summary of the Bill
The primary objective of the bill is to facilitate more effective communication and collaboration between the Department of Defense and organizations within the defense industrial sector. This includes developing plans for joint exercises, establishing information-sharing mechanisms, and gathering feedback from commercial partners. The bill mandates the involvement of various military and government leaders to ensure a holistic approach to countering the specified capabilities of the PLA.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the drafting and implications of the bill:
Lack of Financial Clarity: The bill fails to specify financial implications or constraints, which could lead to inefficient allocation or mismanagement of resources.
Unspecified Industrial Participants: The absence of specific organizations within the defense industrial base might lead to favoritism, exclusion, or inefficiencies.
Vague Mechanisms for Coordination: The term "mechanisms through which organizations... can share information" lacks clarity, potentially hindering effective implementation.
Broad Terms and Ambiguities: The bill uses terms like "implications for the defense industrial base" without sufficient detail, which may obscure comprehensive understanding and execution.
Timeline and Accountability Concerns: While the bill sets a deadline for the initial report, it lacks a subsequent timeline for implementing plans, raising concerns about accountability and transparency.
Undefined Metrics for Success: By not specifying criteria for evaluating the success of the coordination efforts, the bill may fall short in measuring progress or impact.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, the bill could influence public interests in multiple ways. On one hand, increased defense capabilities and strengthened national security frameworks can enhance public safety. On the other hand, without clear financial accountability, there is a risk of taxpayer dollars not being used efficiently, which is a critical public concern.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders within the defense industry, the bill presents both opportunities and challenges. Companies may gain from increased collaboration with the Department of Defense, potentially leading to lucrative contracts and technological advancements. However, the vagueness in identifying participating organizations could lead to an uneven playing field, where some might be inadvertently excluded.
From a governmental perspective, enhanced coordination efforts can improve national security against technological threats from adversaries like the PLA. Still, the bill's ambiguities necessitate careful attention to ensure efficient and effective implementation. Lastly, commercial partners and other federal agencies involved may need to adjust resources and strategies to align with the bill's directives effectively.
In summary, while the bill targets critical areas of national defense, its effectiveness will depend on resolving the specified issues to ensure clarity, fairness, and proper management of resources.
Issues
The section lacks specific financial implications or budgetary constraints, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending. This could be significant for the public as it concerns the allocation and management of taxpayer funds. [Section 1]
The section does not identify particular organizations in the defense industrial base, which may lead to unintended favoritism or exclusion. This could have legal and ethical implications, as it may affect the fairness and inclusivity of the coordination efforts. [Section 1]
The language such as 'mechanisms through which organizations... can share information' is vague and lacks specificity about these mechanisms. This vagueness can lead to inefficiencies or misinterpretations in the execution of the bill's directives. [Section 1, (b)(2)(B)]
The terms 'implications for the defense industrial base' and 'steps that may be taken to enhance the ability' are broad and require further clarification. This lack of specificity may hinder comprehensive understanding and effectiveness of the proposed efforts. [Section 1, (b)(3)]
There is no clear timeline beyond the submission of the report for implementing the plans, which could affect accountability and transparency. This is an important issue as it may lead to delays or lack of follow-through in achieving the bill's objectives. [Section 1]
The section does not specify any criteria or metrics for evaluating the success of the coordination efforts with the defense industrial base. Without clear metrics, it may be difficult to measure progress or success, impacting accountability and effectiveness. [Section 1]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Report on efforts to counter certain capabilities of the People’s Liberation of Army Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes a requirement for the Department of Defense to submit a report by March 2024 on efforts to work with defense industries to counter certain military tech capabilities of China. The report should cover coordination in space and cyber domains, include plans like joint exercises and sharing threat information, and provide feedback on how potential conflicts affect these efforts.