Overview

Title

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to implement Salmonella framework for raw poultry products.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 690 is about stopping the government from spending money to make new rules for keeping chicken safe from germs that make people sick. It's like saying, "We won't spend our allowance on making new chicken safety rules."

Summary AI

H. R. 690 is a proposed bill that aims to stop the use of Federal funds for a specific purpose. It seeks to prevent the implementation of the "Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products," a rule suggested by the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the Department of Agriculture. This rule was initially published in the Federal Register in August 2024 and focuses on regulating Salmonella in raw poultry. If passed, this bill would prohibit any steps towards finalizing or enforcing this proposed rule using Federal funds.

Published

2025-01-23
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-23
Package ID: BILLS-119hr690ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
188
Pages:
2
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 65
Verbs: 16
Adjectives: 10
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 7
Entities: 20

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.47
Average Sentence Length:
26.86
Token Entropy:
4.32
Readability (ARI):
16.58

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

H.R. 690 is a piece of legislation introduced in the United States House of Representatives that aims to prevent federal funds from being used to implement or enforce a rule known as the "Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products." This rule was proposed by the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the Department of Agriculture in 2024. The bill specifically targets the finalization and enforcement of measures intended to control Salmonella, a bacteria that can cause severe foodborne illnesses, particularly when present in raw poultry products.

Significant Issues

One of the main issues with H.R. 690 is that it could be seen as undermining public health efforts. By prohibiting federal funding for the "Salmonella Framework," the bill potentially hampers governmental and regulatory attempts to reduce Salmonella contamination in poultry—a move that could have serious implications for food safety. The absence of an explanation or rationale for this prohibition also raises concerns about policy transparency and may lead to legal challenges or public opposition, especially from advocates focused on improving food safety standards.

Impact on the Public

At a broad level, this bill may have concerning consequences for the general public. Without federal support and enforcement of regulations aimed at controlling Salmonella contamination in poultry, the risk of foodborne illness outbreaks could increase. Such a scenario can lead to wider public health challenges, affecting consumers who rely on the safety of food products available in the market. It can also place additional burdens on the healthcare system should there be an increase in Salmonella-related illnesses.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Different stakeholders could be affected by this bill in varied ways. Public health advocates and organizations focused on food safety might find this legislation troubling, as it potentially weakens efforts to protect consumers from harmful foodborne pathogens. On the other hand, those in the poultry industry might support the bill, viewing it as a means to avoid potentially costly regulations. However, the lack of transparency about the bill's rationale and objectives creates uncertainty for both supporters and opponents, leading to potential conflicts in public policy discussions.

In summary, H.R. 690 presents a significant shift in how food safety regulations concerning Salmonella in poultry are funded and enforced. While aiming to limit federal expenditure on this specific safety framework, the bill raises critical questions and concerns about its broader public health and policy implications. The lack of clarity and justification poses challenges, making it an important topic for ongoing public and legislative debate.

Issues

  • The prohibition on the use of Federal funds for the 'Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products', as stated in Section 1, potentially undermines public health efforts by blocking regulations aimed at controlling Salmonella contamination, a known cause of foodborne illness. This could have significant negative impacts on food safety and public health.

  • Section 1's specific reference to the 'Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products' may lack broader context or justification, leaving stakeholders uncertain of the reasons behind the prohibition and the ramifications of not enforcing these safety measures, impacting public policy transparency.

  • The absence of an explanation or rationale for prohibiting funds in Section 1 could lead to legal challenges or opposition from public health advocates and the general public who are concerned about food safety, making this a potentially contentious or controversial legal matter.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Prohibition on use of Federal funds to implement Salmonella framework for raw poultry products Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits the use of federal funds to finalize, implement, or enforce a specific rule about handling Salmonella in raw poultry products, which was proposed by the Department of Agriculture in 2024.