Overview
Title
To enhance the Federal Government’s planning and preparation for extreme weather and the Federal Government’s dissemination of best practices to respond to extreme weather, thereby increasing resilience, improving regional coordination, and mitigating the financial risk to the Federal Government from such extreme weather, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "PREPARE Act of 2023" is a plan to help the government get ready for and handle really bad weather, like big storms or wildfires, by having different government groups work together and share ideas on a website.
Summary AI
H. R. 6882, known as the "Preparedness and Risk Management for Extreme Weather Patterns Assuring Resilience and Effectiveness Act of 2023" or the "PREPARE Act of 2023," aims to improve how the U.S. government plans for and responds to extreme weather events like hurricanes and wildfires. The bill proposes creating an Interagency Council to set goals and coordinate actions across various government departments to enhance resilience and better manage risks associated with severe weather events. It requires each federal agency to develop comprehensive plans addressing these risks and encourages coordination with state, tribal, and local governments. Additionally, the bill calls for a public website to share information and best practices about extreme weather preparedness and resilience.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The Preparedness and Risk Management for Extreme Weather Patterns Assuring Resilience and Effectiveness Act of 2023, or the PREPARE Act of 2023, is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing the United States' ability to plan, prepare for, and mitigate the impacts of extreme weather. This bill seeks to streamline coordination across government agencies and improve support for regions and communities most vulnerable to severe weather events. It proposes the establishment of an Interagency Council to oversee these efforts, mandating agency-specific plans and the creation of a central website for public information dissemination.
Summary of Significant Issues
While the bill has noble intentions, several issues could hinder its effectiveness. A significant concern is the vague language used in key sections, particularly regarding the goals and responsibilities of the Interagency Council. This ambiguity may lead to inconsistent interpretation and implementation across federal agencies.
Additionally, the bill lacks specific budget allocations or funding sources, raising concerns about potential financial mismanagement. This omission could burden taxpayers if the funds are not efficiently managed. For instance, terms like "adequate resources" are not clearly defined, allowing for varied interpretations that could result in inconsistent preparedness levels among agencies.
Another area of concern is the requirement for agencies to submit detailed reports within tight deadlines, which might impose a burdensome workload, especially on smaller or under-resourced agencies. The bill also involves many federal entities, potentially complicating coordination efforts and leading to overlaps in duties if leadership roles aren't well defined.
Impacts on the Public
The bill's broad aim to improve resilience against extreme weather can significantly benefit the public, especially communities frequently affected by such events. Improved planning and coordination could lead to better-preparedness and response actions, potentially saving lives and reducing property damage.
However, the absence of clear budgeting and accountability measures might lead to inefficient use of resources, ultimately costing taxpayers more without direct or tangible benefits. The repeated administrative tasks required by the bill could increase government spending with little added value unless changes in extreme weather patterns or responses are frequent and significant.
Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
The bill is likely to have varying impacts on different stakeholders. Federal agencies will need to adapt to new planning and reporting requirements, which could strain resources and shift focus from their primary functions, especially if instructions remain vague and accountability measures are not explicitly defined.
Vulnerable communities could benefit from the increased focus on resilience and preparedness as resources and support might become more available. However, these benefits are contingent upon effective implementation, which could be hampered by the bill’s current ambiguities.
Environmental and public health organizations might view the bill positively, as it emphasizes extreme weather planning, which aligns with their long-term objectives. Conversely, industry stakeholders might express concerns if the bill leads to regulatory changes impacting economic activities without sufficient clarity on enforcement and compliance expectations.
Conclusion
In summary, while the PREPARE Act of 2023 sets out with an important mission to bolster the nation's readiness against extreme weather events, its execution could be challenged by vague language and insufficient fiscal clarity. The effectiveness of this legislation will largely depend on subsequent regulatory guidance and the ability of federal, state, and local entities to collaborate effectively without clear directives or dedicated funding. This calls for further refinement of the bill to ensure practical implementation and measurable impacts.
Issues
The broad language regarding the goals and responsibilities of the Interagency Council in Section 2 could lead to interpretation issues, making it unclear how effectiveness and accountability will be measured. This could affect the alignment of different agencies and result in inconsistencies in the implementation of extreme weather policies, potentially impacting vulnerable communities (Section 2).
The lack of specific budget allocations or funding sources in Sections 2 and 3 raises concerns about potential wasteful spending and financial accountability, potentially burdening taxpayers if funds are not managed effectively (Sections 2 and 3).
The term 'adequate resources' in Section 5 is vague and could lead to varied interpretations of necessary resource levels, potentially causing inconsistencies across agencies and resulting in inadequate preparedness for extreme weather events (Section 5).
There is no clear process or criteria for updating the definition of 'extreme weather,' which is revised biennially by the Interagency Council. This could result in inconsistent policy implementation and confusion regarding what weather events qualify as extreme (Section 2).
The requirement for agencies to submit information within 90 days after meetings may impose a heavy reporting burden, raising questions about the feasibility and practicality of this timeframe given varied agency resources (Section 8).
The inclusion of numerous Federal entities in the responsibility and implementation of the bill's objectives may lead to complex coordination issues and potential overlap in duties, especially if leadership roles are not clearly defined (Sections 2 and 9).
The bill lacks specific accountability measures to ensure efficient use of resources and the effectiveness of allocations, raising concerns about financial oversight and justification of expenditure (Section 5).
The responsibilities of co-chairpersons in Section 2 lack clarity, potentially leading to disputes in resource allocation or uneven contributions among agencies, which could affect the overall effectiveness of the Interagency Council (Section 2).
The requirement for biennial inventory publication in Section 6 could lead to repetitive administrative efforts with little clear value unless significant changes are anticipated frequently (Section 6).
The use of statutory references assumes a level of familiarity with such references that might not exist among all readers, potentially leading to confusion or exclusion of non-expert stakeholders from the legislative process (Section 9).
The expected role of public input is vague, lacking procedures or criteria for how feedback will be incorporated, potentially limiting stakeholder engagement and transparency in decision-making (Section 2).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text explains that the "Preparedness and Risk Management for Extreme Weather Patterns Assuring Resilience and Effectiveness Act of 2023" (also known as the "PREPARE Act of 2023") aims to address preparedness and risk management for extreme weather events, detailing the creation of an interagency council, agency planning requirements, resource allocations, progress updates, and the inclusion of extreme weather plans in agency performance plans.
2. Interagency Council on Extreme Weather Resilience, Preparedness, and Risk Identification and Management Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill creates an Interagency Council to improve the United States' ability to deal with extreme weather by focusing on resilience, preparedness, and risk management. It outlines the council's structure, duties, and the collaboration needed with different government agencies and communities, emphasizing support for vulnerable groups and the use of scientific knowledge.
3. Agency planning for extreme weather-related risks Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires each federal agency to create a plan within a year and update it every two years to manage risks from extreme weather. These plans should assess impacts, identify barriers, and detail actions for resilience and improvement, while collaborating with other agencies and public-private partnerships, and should be shared with relevant staff.
4. Website Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the creation of a government website to provide important information about extreme weather, including data, best practices, and tools to help different decision-makers plan and respond effectively. It also describes the roles of various councils and agencies in providing scientific information and conducting public outreach and education regarding these resources.
5. Providing adequate resources and support Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Director of the Office of Management and Budget must ensure that every government agency provides enough resources and support, like administrative help and staff, to the Interagency Council. This support is specifically for maintaining the website mentioned in section 4 and for fulfilling the responsibilities outlined in this Act.
6. Inventory Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill mandates that within a year of its enactment, and then every two years, the Interagency Council must create and share a detailed list of all government agency offices and programs, like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Department of Agriculture’s Climate Hubs, that help with managing and preparing for extreme weather at state, tribal, and local levels. This list should also describe the type of assistance each office or program offers.
7. Meetings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that every six months, the Interagency Council must hold meetings with representatives from various offices and local stakeholders to coordinate efforts and share information on extreme weather resilience and preparedness. During these meetings, participants will collaborate on research agendas, identify areas with unmet informational needs, establish regional priorities, determine resources required for strengthening regional planning, evaluate progress, and exchange best practices for stakeholder engagement and risk management.
8. Progress updates Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Each agency involved in a meeting under section 7 must provide updates on their progress in working together at regional levels to improve resilience and preparedness efforts. This information is shared with several federal programs and agencies to enhance coordination and collaboration at state, tribal, and local levels.
9. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for various terms used in the Act, such as "agency," "extreme weather," and "preparedness." It explains what each term means, often referencing relevant laws or sections for clarification.
10. Requirement to include agency extreme weather plan in agency performance plan Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text requires that each agency must include a description of their most recent plan for dealing with extreme weather in their performance plan, as mandated by certain sections of the United States Code.