Overview
Title
An Act To designate Holcombe Rucker Park, in Harlem, New York, as a National Commemorative Site, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 6852 wants to make a place called Holcombe Rucker Park in New York special by calling it a "National Commemorative Site" to honor a person named Holcombe Rucker. This means people can learn about him and the history of the park, but it won't change any park rules or use any land that belongs to the city or private owners.
Summary AI
H. R. 6852 proposes to recognize Holcombe Rucker Park in Harlem, New York, as a "National Commemorative Site." This designation aims to honor the achievements of Holcombe Rucker and highlight the park’s historic contribution to basketball. The bill allows the Secretary of the Interior to collaborate with local entities for educational purposes but does not permit federal interference with private property rights or the administration by New York City or State. Additionally, it clarifies that the site will not be a part of the National Park System and does not allow land acquisition through condemnation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation seeks to officially recognize Holcombe Rucker Park, located in Harlem, New York, as a National Commemorative Site. This designation aims to acknowledge the park's historical significance in the evolution of basketball and celebrate the achievements of Holcombe Rucker. However, it's important to note that while the park receives this honor, it will not become a unit of the National Park System. This means that its administration remains under the jurisdiction of New York City or the State of New York. The Secretary of the Interior is granted the authority to form cooperative agreements for educational purposes, such as installing plaques or exhibits, but this must be done with the consent of the private property owner.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the main issues identified with the bill is its lack of specificity regarding financial obligations and limits associated with these educational or interpretive activities. The open-ended nature of the language could result in financial inefficiencies or misallocated resources since there is no defined budget or spending cap. Additionally, the bill's provision on forming cooperative agreements lacks detail. This vagueness could lead to ambiguities regarding the terms and conditions, potentially favoring specific local or private entities without ensuring fair or competitive processes.
Furthermore, the broad language describing potential educational exhibits or markers leaves room for varied interpretations of appropriateness and necessity. Without clearer guidelines, there could be inconsistencies in how these are applied or implemented. Also, concerns arise from the lack of a defined course of action in situations where the consent of the site's property owner cannot be obtained, potentially leading to administrative hurdles.
Impact on the Public
This bill might increase public awareness about the historical and cultural significance of Holcombe Rucker Park, enhancing community pride and tourism in Harlem. For basketball enthusiasts and local residents, the designation could deepen their appreciation of the sport's history and provide educational opportunities.
However, without specific funding or administrative guidelines, the public might worry about efficient use of resources. There is a risk of taxpayer money being spent inappropriately if cooperative agreement processes lack transparency or competitive bidding.
Impact on Stakeholders
For New York City and specifically Harlem, this designation provides a prestigious acknowledgment of their local heritage and could attract more visitors. Administrators of the park could benefit from increased national attention and possibly more resources for maintenance and enhancements, provided that agreements are effectively negotiated.
On the other hand, property owners of the site might face pressures related to the imposition of interpretive elements by third parties. The absence of a clear strategy for obtaining property owner consent could lead to disputes or delays. Additionally, local community members and organizations may worry about how these changes might affect access to the park, how activities might be regulated, or whether the site's cultural essence could be altered.
Ultimately, while the bill aims to honor a significant part of basketball history, careful consideration of its issues and a clearer framework could ensure a balanced and beneficial impact on all stakeholders involved.
Issues
The bill does not specify any funding obligations or limits in Section 2, which might lead to concerns about potential wasteful spending if no budget is defined for the designated activities.
The clause regarding cooperative agreements in Section 2 is vague and could potentially favor local authorities or private entities without clear terms or competitive processes being outlined.
The language regarding 'cooperative agreements' and 'interpretive and educational purposes' in Section 2 is somewhat vague, lacking specific details on the nature, scope, or financial responsibilities of such agreements.
The phrase 'interpretive exhibit, or other marker' in Section 2 is broad, leaving room for varied interpretations of what is considered appropriate or necessary, which might lead to inconsistent applications.
Section 2 does not outline a clear recourse if consent from the owner of the Commemorative Site is not provided, leading to potential administration challenges.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act states that it can be referred to as the "Holcombe Rucker Park National Commemorative Site Act".
2. National Commemorative Site Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Holcombe Rucker Park in Harlem, New York, is recognized as a National Commemorative Site to honor its history in basketball, but it won't be part of the National Park System. The Secretary of the Interior can make agreements for educational purposes at the site, but the park's management won't change, and no private property rights will be interfered with.