Overview
Title
To require the United States Government to assist in the establishment of national security councils in specified countries.
ELI5 AI
The CONVENE Act of 2023 is a plan where the U.S. wants to help three small Pacific countries (Micronesia, Marshall Islands, and Palau) work better with America to keep everyone safe, like when there's an emergency or problems at sea.
Summary AI
H. R. 6846, also known as the "CONVENE Act of 2023," directs the U.S. government to help set up national security councils in the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau. The bill aims to improve coordination between these nations and the U.S., particularly in areas like emergency response, law enforcement, and maritime security. It also includes measures to ensure that the technology and services used by these councils meet security standards and are compatible with U.S. systems. Additionally, the Secretary of State must report to Congress on the implementation and effectiveness of these national security councils.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the "Connecting Oceania’s Nations with Vanguard Exercises and National Empowerment Act of 2023," or "CONVENE Act of 2023," seeks to enhance security cooperation between the United States and the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau. Under the proposed legislation, the United States would assist these countries in establishing or developing their national security councils. These councils are intended to improve coordination with the U.S. on various security activities and protect the countries from threats such as cyberattacks. The bill mandates regular reporting to Congress on the progress of these efforts.
Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the text of the bill. First, the selection criteria for the three "specified countries" appear undefined, potentially leading to perceptions of favoritism or unexplained exclusion of other nations with similar needs. Second, the bill's financial implications remain unspecified. The absence of explicit budgetary allocations could hinder financial oversight and accountability.
Additionally, the term "malign actions" is vague and could lead to subjective interpretation, posing a risk of inconsistent policy application. The requirement for comprehensive reports by the Secretary of State may impose an administrative burden without clearly elucidating how they will facilitate better outcomes. Furthermore, the broad definition of "appropriate committees of Congress" might lead to overlapping responsibilities, complicating legislative oversight.
The bill also allows for extensive classification of reports, which might limit transparency. Lastly, it requires that no systems procured originate from certain entities identified under a different piece of legislation, which could lead to compliance challenges or the exclusion of potentially beneficial technology.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill could strengthen bilateral security ties between the U.S. and the specified countries, potentially increasing regional stability in Oceania. Enhanced coordination on issues such as maritime security and disaster response could offer mutual benefits, improving safety and security for citizens in these areas. However, the lack of financial transparency could lead to taxpayer concerns regarding the cost-effectiveness of such international assistance.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the citizens of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau, the establishment of national security councils could lead to enhanced security and resilience against external threats. These councils have the potential to reinforce local governance capacity in addressing national emergencies and foreign threats. However, concerns about sovereignty and external influence might arise if the mechanisms of cooperation are perceived to infringe upon these countries' autonomy.
U.S. policymakers and agencies, especially the Department of State, could face increased administrative responsibilities due to reporting requirements and the need to coordinate the implementation of security standards. On the other hand, defense contractors might see opportunities in providing compliant equipment and cybersecurity solutions that meet the stipulated criteria.
Overall, while the bill aims to foster cooperation and security, ensuring that its provisions are executed transparently and equitably will be crucial to address some stakeholders' concerns and maximize its intended benefits.
Issues
The criteria or justification for selecting the 'specified countries'—the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau—are not outlined in the bill, potentially raising questions about fairness and the exclusion of other countries (Section 3).
The financial implications and potential costs associated with developing and assisting national security councils in these countries are not clearly defined, which could lead to financial oversight issues (Section 3).
The term 'malign actions' in subsection (a)(2) is vague and lacks a clear definition, which may lead to inconsistent or broad applications and interpretations that could be politically or ethically controversial (Section 3).
The bill may create an administrative burden on the Secretary of State by requiring comprehensive reports, without clearly explaining how these would improve outcomes, potentially impacting efficiency and resource allocation (Section 3, subsection (d)).
The possible overlap or confusion about specific responsibilities due to the broad definition of 'appropriate committees of Congress' might complicate legislative oversight and coordination (Section 2).
The phrase 'may be submitted in unclassified form' regarding reports could limit transparency by permitting extensive classification of information without clear guidelines (Section 3, subsection (d)(2)).
The use of equipment or systems from entities identified under another act (William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act) could lead to compliance complexities or exclude potentially beneficial technology from use (Section 3, subsection (c)(2)).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill provides its short title, stating that it can be referred to as the "Connecting Oceania’s Nations with Vanguard Exercises and National Empowerment Act of 2023," or simply the "CONVENE Act of 2023."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines key terms in the Act, including "appropriate committees of Congress", which are specific committees in both the Senate and the House of Representatives; "national security council", referring to an intergovernmental body responsible for security cooperation in a given country; and "specified country", which includes the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau.
3. National security councils of specified countries Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of State is authorized to work with national security councils in certain countries to enhance their coordination with the U.S., improve security activities, and safeguard against cyber threats. A report on the progress of these efforts, including any challenges or attempts to influence the councils by malign actors, must be submitted to Congress starting within 180 days and annually for two years.