Overview
Title
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide for a moratorium on number reassignment after a disaster declaration, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
When a big storm or disaster happens, this bill wants to make sure people can keep their home phone numbers without getting charged extra, even if they can't live in their house for a while. It also tells phone companies they should help people connect their phones again once they're back home, without charging them more money.
Summary AI
H.R. 6836 seeks to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to implement a moratorium on reassigning phone numbers after a disaster has been declared. The bill proposes that during a designated disaster period, phone numbers for fixed wireline voice service cannot be reassigned without the subscriber's request, and providers cannot charge fees for service termination. Additionally, providers must allow subscribers to reconnect services at no extra cost if they can prove their residence is inaccessible or uninhabitable due to the disaster. The Federal Communications Commission is also directed to amend its rules to enact these requirements.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "Preserving Home and Office Numbers in Emergencies Act of 2023" or the "PHONE Act of 2023" seeks to amend the Communications Act of 1934. Specifically, it aims to establish a moratorium on reassigning phone numbers in areas affected by disasters, as designated by a presidential declaration. It mandates that phone numbers, especially those linked to landline services, should not be reassigned without the consent of the subscribers post-disaster. Moreover, it includes provisions that protect subscribers from fees if they need to cancel their service due to their residence being inaccessible or uninhabitable. The procedure for identifying which areas are affected requires cooperation between states and relevant authorities like FEMA.
Significant Issues
Several important issues arise from this bill:
Lack of Transparency and Oversight: One central concern is the lack of clear guidelines on how states and entities like FEMA should determine and designate affected areas. The bill’s reliance on these entities without specified criteria could lead to inconsistencies and arbitrary decisions, potentially affecting the fairness and efficacy of the moratorium.
Covered Period Definition: The prescribed period of one year for the moratorium after a disaster declaration might not be in tune with the actual needs of the affected areas. Reconstruction and recovery can vary greatly, and a fixed timeframe may not suffice to address longer recovery periods, leading to premature reassignments.
Financial Implications for Service Providers: Service providers might face financial burdens as they are required to maintain numbers without charging certain fees. This obligation, without a mechanism for reimbursement, could lead to financial losses for these companies.
Complexity and Comprehension: The language of the bill is complex and might be difficult for individuals without specialized knowledge to understand. This complexity could result in misunderstandings about the bill's intentions and implementation.
Narrow Focus on Fixed Voice Services: The bill predominantly addresses fixed wireline voice services, potentially ignoring other forms of communication that are vital, such as mobile or internet services, especially significant during disasters.
Potential Public Impact
The public might see positive effects from the bill, particularly those directly impacted by disasters. The ability to retain critical phone numbers during turmoil can significantly aid in maintaining communication lines at a crucial time. For individuals returning to disaster zones, a guarantee of no additional fees to resume service is also beneficial.
However, the ambiguities in the process for designating affected zones could potentially lead to uneven protections for individuals depending on their location and the efficiency of their respective state’s response. Furthermore, subscribers who own numbers but are not immediately returning may face delays in number reassignment, which might contribute to inefficient use of telecommunications resources.
Stakeholder Considerations
For service providers, the bill poses a challenge due to the financial implications of holding numbers without imposing fees. This might invite calls for government intervention or support to alleviate the economic impact on these companies. On the other hand, subscribers benefit from the waivers and protections offered, especially in scenarios where residences become uninhabitable without foreseeable repair.
Government agencies like FEMA and state governments will need to coordinate efficiently to implement the bill’s provisions fairly, while telecommunications companies must adapt to comply without significant financial strain. The emphasis on fixed landlines might prompt a reevaluation of communication priorities during disasters, possibly leading to future legislation that also addresses mobile and internet services more robustly.
In conclusion, the PHONE Act of 2023 proposes changes to protect consumers post-disaster, though it also raises questions about fairness, practicality, and financial impacts that will need to be addressed to ensure successful implementation and equitable benefits.
Issues
The process for designating an area as subject to the moratorium may lack transparency and public oversight, as it heavily relies on states' and FEMA's determinations without clear guidelines or criteria mentioned in Section 2. This could lead to inconsistent or arbitrary application of the moratorium.
The definition of a 'covered period' in Section 2, which is fixed to 1 year after a presidential disaster declaration, may not adequately consider the actual duration needed for recovery efforts. This could result in inefficient or premature reassignment of numbers impacting disaster recovery efforts.
The bill in Section 2 could create unintended financial burdens on service providers, as they are required to hold numbers without the ability to charge fees, potentially leading to financial losses if not compensated.
The language used in Section 2 is complex and may be difficult for individuals without a legal or telecommunications background to understand, potentially leading to confusion regarding the bill's requirements and processes.
The bill's focus on fixed wireline voice services in Section 2 does not address the evolving communication needs during a disaster, such as mobile or internet services, which could be vital and potentially neglected.
Section 2 does not specify criteria for determining 'covered damage,' potentially leading to varied interpretations by different states and inconsistencies in applying the moratorium across different disaster-affected areas.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the Act can be officially called the “Preserving Home and Office Numbers in Emergencies Act of 2023” or simply the “PHONE Act of 2023”.
2. Moratorium on number reassignment after disaster declaration Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In the event of a major disaster, this bill section prohibits the reassignment of a fixed wireline phone number in affected areas without the subscriber's consent. It allows subscribers to extend the holding period of their number, cancel their service without fees, and resubscribe to service without additional costs if they can show their residence is inaccessible or uninhabitable, while also ensuring public identification of disaster-affected areas.