Overview

Title

To amend title 44, United States Code, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 6822 is a plan to make the rules about U.S. records clearer and fairer by changing old words to new ones that use people's job titles, like "the Archivist," instead of "his" or "he," to avoid confusion and be more fair.

Summary AI

The bill, H. R. 6822, aims to update and modernize parts of title 44 of the United States Code, specifically related to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). It changes various references in the law from individuals, like "his" or "he," to more neutral terms such as "the Archivist" or "the head of the Federal agency." These amendments reflect a more inclusive language and clarify the roles and responsibilities of officials in charge of managing federal records.

Published

2023-12-14
Congress: 118
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2023-12-14
Package ID: BILLS-118hr6822ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
728
Pages:
4
Sentences:
6

Language

Nouns: 164
Verbs: 72
Adjectives: 9
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 29
Entities: 36

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.37
Average Sentence Length:
121.33
Token Entropy:
4.08
Readability (ARI):
57.82

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "National Archives and Records Administration Modernization Act" (or simply the "NARA Modernization Act"), seeks to amend Title 44 of the United States Code. Title 44 encapsulates the laws governing public printing, documents, and the management of federal records. The primary focus of H.R. 6822 is to update and clarify the language used within these laws by replacing pronouns that refer to positions of authority with explicit titles, such as “the Archivist” or “the Director.” This change aims to eliminate ambiguity around who holds certain responsibilities within federal agencies, particularly relating to the management and custody of records.

Summary of Significant Issues

A significant issue with this bill is its potential lack of clarity surrounding the roles and responsibilities of specific positions within the National Archives and related federal agencies. By replacing pronouns with titles like "the Archivist," the amendments intend to improve clarity. However, without a detailed definition of the specific duties and responsibilities of these roles, there remains a risk of ambiguity regarding who is accountable for certain actions. Additionally, the bill repeatedly introduces phrases such as “the Archivist may,” yet does not thoroughly explain the rationale or the potential impacts of these amendments. This could make it challenging for stakeholders to fully understand how these changes will affect them or the broader functions of federal records management.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the changes proposed in this bill might lead to a more organized federal records management system. Improving the clarity of language may help ensure that responsibilities are more clearly delineated, which could lead to better accountability and efficiency in managing national records. For the general public, particularly those who access or rely on federal archives for historical research or legal purposes, these changes could translate into improved service delivery due to potentially clearer operational protocols within the relevant agencies.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The primary stakeholders directly affected by this bill include officials within the National Archives and federal agencies handling records, who may find their roles more clearly defined, potentially facilitating more efficient decision-making and operations. By clearly establishing titles instead of pronouns, agency employees might experience improved workflow and a reduction in jurisdictional disputes over record custodianship. However, without further explanation or context provided within the bill, changes might also induce confusion if employees or agency leaders are uncertain about adjusted procedural hierarchies or expect continued reliance on previously established practices. Additionally, legal professionals and historians who frequently interact with governmental archives might initially experience hurdles or adjustments as these new protocols are implemented, though such impacts could be temporary as clarity increases.

Overall, while the bill aims to modernize and clarify the legal framework governing the nation’s archives, thoughtful implementation and potential follow-up guidance from relevant authorities will be crucial to address any initial ambiguities tied to these legislative amendments.

Issues

  • The amendments in Section 2 aim to replace generic pronouns with specific titles such as 'the Archivist' and 'the Director,' which could improve clarity but lack detailed definitions of their roles, potentially leaving ambiguity concerning their specific responsibilities. This could have implications for the accountability and operational clarity of these positions in Title 44.

  • The bill sections are repeatedly amended with phrases like 'the Archivist may' without providing sufficient context or explaining the rationale behind these changes, which might be necessary to fully understand the potential implications or benefits of such amendments. This affects sections 710, 711, 2108, 2109, 2110, 2112, 2307, 2903, 3308, 3310, and 3311.

  • There are no direct indications of favoritism or inefficiencies mentioned in the amendments. However, without understanding the functional impacts of these amendments, it's difficult to assess whether they might inadvertently lead to inefficiencies or benefit specific groups. These issues are general and relate to the overall bill.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act provides its short title, stating that it may be referred to as the "National Archives and Records Administration Modernization Act" or just the "NARA Modernization Act".

2. Amendments Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendments to Title 44 of the United States Code replace references to individuals with specific titles and positions, such as replacing pronouns like "he" with titles like "the Archivist" or "the Director," to clarify who holds certain responsibilities. These changes provide clearer definitions of roles and responsibilities within federal agencies.